Recent Topics
Why no love for M1 gear oils?
by zuluplus30 - 08/19/19 03:02 PM
2005 Chrysler 300 HEMI cam position sensor diagnosis
by 53' Stude - 08/19/19 02:38 PM
Noisy idle in gear but not neutral or park
by cwilliamsws6 - 08/19/19 02:30 PM
Driven 10W-30 conventional $28.63 case of 12
by Randy_R - 08/19/19 02:16 PM
What kind of cat is this? Warning, it's dead
by skyactiv - 08/19/19 02:09 PM
Ford Dealer wanted $320 to Flush Tranny
by Mr_Luke - 08/19/19 02:05 PM
Best retail product for convenience?
by buster - 08/19/19 01:42 PM
Shell Gas Truck oil...Im giving it a try...
by Navi - 08/19/19 01:10 PM
Quiet tire for 2018 Civic Hatchback
by Blue_Goose - 08/19/19 12:25 PM
SP-10 vs PAG-46 Compressor oil
by nwjones18 - 08/19/19 12:08 PM
Jeep's, Late YJ/Early TJ
by wings&wheels - 08/19/19 11:46 AM
Determining base oil composition
by Jimmy_Russells - 08/19/19 10:50 AM
Mobil ATF 320
by BlueSky - 08/19/19 10:34 AM
Question about diagnostic procedure
by Dave Sherman - 08/19/19 10:05 AM
1980 Yamaha MX175 Two stroke issue.
by Panzerman - 08/19/19 09:41 AM
Phillips 66 Choice BOGO @ Orscheln
by Pat in Speedway - 08/19/19 08:46 AM
Valvoline ME 0w20 $3 quart
by oldbird - 08/19/19 08:19 AM
What to do with core MAF air flow sensor
by PeterGreen - 08/19/19 07:47 AM
Newest Members
serhat, BlueSky, 444samc, Espada, samhainlimon
68998 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
118 registered members (1978elcamino, Al, 53' Stude, 14Accent, 2010Civic, 444samc, 8 invisible), 2,354 guests, and 30 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics293,526
Posts5,041,706
Members68,998
Most Online3,532
Jul 30th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode #4105290 05/24/16 01:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,294
MolaKule Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,294
This past winter we had numerous intermittent StabiliTrack codes. Sometimes the steering wheel position sensor or wheel speed sensors and connectors can get flaky and throw these codes, but no fault was found with these.

GM had issued a TSB for this problem and reprogramming, but none of these codes made any sense.

The wife came hone Saturday after her trip to her mom's and said the '08 TrailBlazer had no AC, no PWR Windows, no guages, no radio.

I checked all of the pertinent fuses in both the Engine Compartment and those underneath the back seat and no blown fuses.

I hooked up my OBD-II scanner and no talky to the PCM, no codes.

I was fearing an Instrument Cluster and or CAN bus problem.

I unhooked the various Control Modules one-by-one.

It turned out that the OnStar module was partially shorting the CAN bus and pulling down voltages from the PCM.

Disconnected the OnStar module and wolla, everything worked again. Since we don't use it and never did, I did not replace it with a new $600.00 unit.

The CAN bus is great when you have various control modules scattered around the vehicle, but it only takes one module with a flaky CAN transceiver or cable fault to bring it down. When this happens, the PCM goes into its Default/Open-Loop mode so one can still drive the vehicle home or to the repair shop.

Last edited by MolaKule; 05/24/16 01:25 PM.

The value of a scientific theory is its ability to prompt further study, not that it has any relation to the established facts of scientific reality.
Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: MolaKule] #4105297 05/24/16 01:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,745
N
NateDN10 Offline
Offline
N
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,745
Voila.


2016 Mazda3 - 20,000 mi.
2011 Toyota Sienna - 100,000 mi.
Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: MolaKule] #4105316 05/24/16 01:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,462
4
4wheeldog Offline
Offline
4
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,462
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
This past winter we had numerous intermittent StabiliTrack codes. Sometimes the steering wheel position sensor or wheel speed sensors and connectors can get flaky and throw these codes, but no fault was found with these.

GM had issued a TSB for this problem and reprogramming, but none of these codes made any sense.

The wife came hone Saturday after her trip to her mom's and said the '08 TrailBlazer had no AC, no PWR Windows, no guages, no radio.

I checked all of the pertinent fuses in both the Engine Compartment and those underneath the back seat and no blown fuses.

I hooked up my OBD-II scanner and no talky to the PCM, no codes.

I was fearing an Instrument Cluster and or CAN bus problem.

I unhooked the various Control Modules one-by-one.

It turned out that the OnStar module was partially shorting the CAN bus and pulling down voltages from the PCM.

Disconnected the OnStar module and wolla, everything worked again. Since we don't use it and never did, I did not replace it with a new $600.00 unit.

The CAN bus is great when you have various control modules scattered around the vehicle, but it only takes one module with a flaky CAN transceiver or cable fault to bring it down. When this happens, the PCM goes into its Default/Open-Loop mode so one can still drive the vehicle home or to the repair shop.


The NSA will be around to patch it back up. After all.....How will they monitor you, with the OnStar nonop?

Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: MolaKule] #4105343 05/24/16 02:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,704
O
Oro_O Offline
Offline
O
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,704
Interesting point and information; thank you.

My mother has a 2007 Equinox she's had since new, and it has unpredictably thrown StabiliTrak codes since it was a year or two old. I do not think hers has OnStar, but perhaps I can use the CAN bus clue to find something causing it.

Most recently, my father and I poked around to diagnose increased oil usage. We re-connected some loose vacuum hoses and changed the front spark plug wires. It immediately through a StabiliTrak code when re-started. This led me to realize the StabiliTrak system itself likely had nothing to do with it.

Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: MolaKule] #4105373 05/24/16 02:47 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 629
W
Wheel Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 629
I know that controller area networks are cheap and reasonably simple, but there are better, albeit more expensive network solutions that don't fail this way.


2009 Subaru Legacy (N/A)
Pennzoil Platinum Plus and NAPA filter
Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: MolaKule] #4105384 05/24/16 02:49 PM
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 42
M
mr_boring Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 42
I used to have a can bus problem but then I got married and had a kid and had to get a real job, so no more can bus for me. When I retire though, I'm moving to Colorado and it's on!!!! You can have all the can bus you want there!!!

EDIT - I should have made the move to Colorada an off topic disclosure!!!

Last edited by mr_boring; 05/24/16 02:50 PM.
Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: Wheel] #4105465 05/24/16 04:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,294
MolaKule Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,294
Originally Posted By: Wheel
I know that controller area networks are cheap and reasonably simple, but there are better, albeit more expensive network solutions that don't fail this way.


True, but this is a Vehicle CAN Bus conforming to SAE J1939.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAE_J1939

Not exactly a fault Tolerant bus.

Recall in this case the OnStar module was doing two things, pulling down the Voltage supply line AND shorting the CAN Bus.

Last edited by MolaKule; 05/24/16 04:42 PM.

The value of a scientific theory is its ability to prompt further study, not that it has any relation to the established facts of scientific reality.
Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: MolaKule] #4106083 05/25/16 10:13 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,430
D
DriveHard Online Content
Online Content
D
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,430
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
Originally Posted By: Wheel
I know that controller area networks are cheap and reasonably simple, but there are better, albeit more expensive network solutions that don't fail this way.


True, but this is a Vehicle CAN Bus conforming to SAE J1939.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAE_J1939

Not exactly a fault Tolerant bus.

Recall in this case the OnStar module was doing two things, pulling down the Voltage supply line AND shorting the CAN Bus.


Actually, J1939 is usually only used in the heavy truck and off highway markets. I believe GM is following ISO J1850.


Smile, it increases your face value
2013 Fiat 500 Abarth mod heavy (my DD)
2018 Alfa Romeo Stelvio TI Sport (wife's)
2011 Silverado Crew Cab LT 6.2L/6spd (tow pig)
2007 Nissan Xterra (trail toy)
Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: DriveHard] #4106085 05/25/16 10:18 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,430
D
DriveHard Online Content
Online Content
D
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,430
Originally Posted By: DriveHard
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
Originally Posted By: Wheel
I know that controller area networks are cheap and reasonably simple, but there are better, albeit more expensive network solutions that don't fail this way.


True, but this is a Vehicle CAN Bus conforming to SAE J1939.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAE_J1939

Not exactly a fault Tolerant bus.

Recall in this case the OnStar module was doing two things, pulling down the Voltage supply line AND shorting the CAN Bus.


Actually, J1939 is usually only used in the heavy truck and off highway markets. I believe GM is following ISO J1850.


Ok, actually I think GM is using J1850 for the standard OBDII diagnostic communications, but has their own GMLAN for internal CAN communications and systems controls.

http://www.acdelcotechconnect.com/pdf/imtn_V16I109.pdf


Smile, it increases your face value
2013 Fiat 500 Abarth mod heavy (my DD)
2018 Alfa Romeo Stelvio TI Sport (wife's)
2011 Silverado Crew Cab LT 6.2L/6spd (tow pig)
2007 Nissan Xterra (trail toy)
Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: MolaKule] #4106170 05/25/16 11:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 629
W
Wheel Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 629
That's what I was getting at, CAN isn't fault tolerant. It has no intelligence in it to prevent one device from halting good communication. These networks could be built in a fashion more like a good TCP/IP/packet switching computer network.

This could provide some fault tolerance and security that is lacking.

The downside would be somewhat more cost.


2009 Subaru Legacy (N/A)
Pennzoil Platinum Plus and NAPA filter
Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: DriveHard] #4107211 05/26/16 01:04 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,294
MolaKule Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,294
Originally Posted By: DriveHard
Originally Posted By: DriveHard
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
Originally Posted By: Wheel
I know that controller area networks are cheap and reasonably simple, but there are better, albeit more expensive network solutions that don't fail this way.


True, but this is a Vehicle CAN Bus conforming to SAE J1939.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAE_J1939

Not exactly a fault Tolerant bus.

Recall in this case the OnStar module was doing two things, pulling down the Voltage supply line AND shorting the CAN Bus.


Actually, J1939 is usually only used in the heavy truck and off highway markets. I believe GM is following ISO J1850.


Ok, actually I think GM is using J1850 for the standard OBDII diagnostic communications, but has their own GMLAN for internal CAN communications and systems controls.

http://www.acdelcotechconnect.com/pdf/imtn_V16I109.pdf


Thanks for the Additional Info.

Yep, Bosch originally developed the CAN but everyone has their own flavor of SAE J1939.


The value of a scientific theory is its ability to prompt further study, not that it has any relation to the established facts of scientific reality.
Re: Recent discovery of SatbiliTrack failure Mode [Re: Wheel] #4107215 05/26/16 01:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,294
MolaKule Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,294
Originally Posted By: Wheel
That's what I was getting at, CAN isn't fault tolerant. It has no intelligence in it to prevent one device from halting good communication. These networks could be built in a fashion more like a good TCP/IP/packet switching computer network.

This could provide some fault tolerance and security that is lacking.

The downside would be somewhat more cost.


Agreed, in the Aerospace industry we designed-in some very good high speed FT buses.

Maybe someone did an analysis and decided this was good enough based on times to fault occurrence.


The value of a scientific theory is its ability to prompt further study, not that it has any relation to the established facts of scientific reality.
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™