Ate Type 200 vs. Castrol LMA/GT?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
9,614
Location
Pennsylbammyvania
As far as the speed of moisture absorption between these two brake fluids, which one is superior (slower), allowing longer full flush periods on a street driven car?
21.gif


I KNOW that the Type 200 has much higher wet and dry boiling point specs, but most on here seem to think that also means a quicker uptake of moisture as well.

I take for granted that EITHER of these two fluids would be slower to take on moisture than the 'liquid gold' priced, but crazy high wet boiling point, Castrol React SRF, correct??
 
Noone has graphed moisture absorption of brake fluids.

My cheap dry bled yearly DOT4 will beat your never bled fancy wet brake fluid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top