Recent Topics
2.4 multi air under valve cover
by ram_man
03/25/17 01:28 PM
Weather Channel Doppler Radar
by HosteenJorje
03/25/17 12:34 PM
They Are QUICK !!
by billt460
03/25/17 12:15 PM
GM 6094M- Mobil 1 High Mileage
by TmanP
03/25/17 11:58 AM
Help with bypass idea
by FamousAmos50
03/25/17 11:30 AM
99 Cent Store
by Cristobal
03/25/17 11:22 AM
Question about two oils.
by Cristobal
03/25/17 11:06 AM
Cadillac | 2017 CTS-V Sedan
by AirgunSavant
03/25/17 10:44 AM
2009 Accord Valvetrain Pic - 120k
by redhat
03/25/17 10:25 AM
Automated Car Washes
by Char Baby
03/25/17 09:44 AM
Why You Should Change Your Own Oil
by AirgunSavant
03/25/17 09:38 AM
Virgin Amsoil EA 15k03
by cronk
03/25/17 09:23 AM
Max interval for Napa Silver?
by gfh77665
03/25/17 09:03 AM
Which oil, CI-4+ or CK-4
by malloj
03/25/17 08:38 AM
Pennzoil Euro L 5w30
by pbm
03/25/17 08:09 AM
Which oil to try.....
by chiefsfan1
03/25/17 07:59 AM
Same price-PU 5w-30 or Edge Extended 5w-30
by kr_bitog
03/25/17 07:10 AM
2014 Genesis Coupe
by JetStar
03/25/17 06:53 AM
Fleet maintenance system
by msmoke00
03/25/17 06:34 AM
Suggest a Practice Electric Guitar Amp
by The_German
03/25/17 06:31 AM
Newest Members
C2vette, AZ426John, stanglife, grumpyrat, Rugman
60964 Registered Users
Who's Online
71 registered (andyd, Best F100, amblerman, 4WD, asand1, Brent_G, 4 invisible), 2521 Guests and 11 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
60964 Members
66 Forums
262791 Topics
4338554 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3429787 - 07/20/14 12:42 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: bruno]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 7357
Loc: beaver land EH?
Originally Posted By: bruno
Back in the '50s this was tried .... it was called a Swash Plate design . Fine for clean conditions like AC compressors but otherwise it was a dud .

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it's worth doing .


+1 with what Bruno said.

Remember: unlike sealed A/C compressor, which runs in a sealed, uncontaminated environment lubricated with compressor oil, etc. (which remains uncontaminated/not deteriorated) for a long, long time; exposing to fuel and air, and dirt in air (abrasion), combustion byproducts, blowby, moisture/condensation, etc. there will be no guarantee on how long/reliable such design would be, and also the inherent energy conversion efficiency also.

Just because it looks good in theory doesn't mean it would be meaningful/practical in real-life situation.

Afterall: we have been constantly refining/improving the venerable internal reciprocating combustion engine design for a century now, it would be challenging to start from scratch to design something even better...

I know it's not 100% impossible, but it would be challenging.

Q.
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3430544 - 07/20/14 07:38 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Shannow Offline


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 35193
Loc: Oz

Top
#3433464 - 07/23/14 02:30 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
A_Harman Offline


Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 6260
Loc: Michigan
Google search barrel engines and read up on their long, unsuccessful history.
_________________________
1985 Z51 Corvette track car
2002 Camaro Z28 LS1/6-speed
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 diesel
1972 GMC 1500 shortbed project truck

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2