Recent Topics
liquimoly diesel purge
by nyumski
09/25/16 05:22 AM
Castrol 0w40 vs Motul XCess 8100 5w40 base oil
by NocturnalG
09/25/16 01:39 AM
Finding My Biological Father
by john_pifer
09/25/16 12:15 AM
Engine Oi Tips for all buddies out here
by kestrelong
09/24/16 11:52 PM
Virgin Napa Pro Select 21522
by Farmer
09/24/16 11:45 PM
Virgin Napa Gold 1348
by Farmer
09/24/16 11:43 PM
Virgin Napa Pro Select 27145
by Farmer
09/24/16 11:41 PM
Wix 57145, 268 Hours
by Farmer
09/24/16 11:40 PM
Forester XT filter ok on Tribeca?
by dx92beater
09/24/16 11:08 PM
Speedometer problems
by SEMI_287
09/24/16 11:02 PM
06 Tribeca B9 with H6 engine, 161 k miles
by dx92beater
09/24/16 10:57 PM
Proline (Pepboys) Oil Filter: Who Makes Them?
by THafeez
09/24/16 10:46 PM
Newest Members
Sonja, petroff, RX300, PCWW, Reo4ua
59181 Registered Users
Who's Online
29 registered (4WD, bandz7, 1foxracing, billt460, bmod305, Atesz792, 3 invisible), 833 Guests and 15 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59181 Members
66 Forums
254901 Topics
4186547 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3428449 - 07/18/14 12:16 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
yvon_la Offline


Registered: 05/20/14
Posts: 1269
Loc: quebec canada
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: yvon_la
(But would not meet the energy conserving limit for hths 150)

I'm not really sure what you wrote here.

In simplest terms, an oil that has an HT/HS Viscosity of 3.5 cP or higher will not meet the energy conserving requirements stipulated in ILSAC GF5 spec.

yep
_________________________
Truck driver
Nissan versa note s 2014 Mobil Delvac 1 LE 5W-30 supertech st-6607(edition 2016) castrol transynd

Top
#3428461 - 07/18/14 12:29 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13031
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: yvon_la
(But would not meet the energy conserving limit for hths 150)

I'm not really sure what you wrote here.

In simplest terms, an oil that has an HT/HS Viscosity of 3.5 cP or higher will not meet the energy conserving requirements stipulated in ILSAC GF5 spec.




There's some dubiousness about Renewable Lube around this. They claim the 0w30 is HTHS of 3.6-3.8 but also call it energy conserving. I've never gotten a clear answer out of them on this.

Then again, their basestocks and chemistry seem to be quite advanced so it's possible that the HTHS is a bit lower (3.2-3.4?) but the formula is so stout that it maintains that viscosity for a very long time.

The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40, and almost a 0w40, leads me to believe there is some very sophisticated engineering they keep secret.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
#3428487 - 07/18/14 12:54 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: dparm]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 32133
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: dparm
The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40,

If the oil meets the cold viscosity test requirements of 5w, then it should be labeled as such. Unless of course they don't claim any API/SAE J300 compliance, in which case they can call it anything they want.
_________________________
'02 530i (Edge HM 10W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T (Edge 5W-40)

Top
#3428741 - 07/18/14 08:26 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13031
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: dparm
The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40,

If the oil meets the cold viscosity test requirements of 5w, then it should be labeled as such. Unless of course they don't claim any API/SAE J300 compliance, in which case they can call it anything they want.




They label it as 15w40 for marketing purposes -- HDEO users want to see 15w40, even though the 5w40 might be superior. Bill told me this. Supposedly it's very close to being a 0w40.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2