Recent Topics
High Mileage Oil question
by Oilied
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
FRAM CA9564 fits 4-cyl Hondas $4.65 RockAuto
by wgtoys
Yesterday at 10:32 PM
Amsoil Dual Remote with MotorGuard
by A310
Yesterday at 09:32 PM
Wood finish question
by dja4260
Yesterday at 09:17 PM
World Amazing Modern Agriculture Equipment
by friendly_jacek
Yesterday at 08:25 PM
JEEP WINDOWS NOT WORKING
by taztheman
Yesterday at 07:32 PM
Truck pulling
by car51
Yesterday at 07:02 PM
Mobil 1 in for 1 year, 2 months, change or not?
by NH73
Yesterday at 06:22 PM
Added To The Stash Today
by Red91
Yesterday at 06:05 PM
2011 Acura Mdx Rear Diff fluids
by Brolly
Yesterday at 04:18 PM
Goodbye car; Hello phone as Favorite toy
by veryHeavy
Yesterday at 04:14 PM
Dallas mayor sues cop/firefighter pension plan
by Mr Nice
Yesterday at 04:04 PM
Newest Members
StayinGreazy, DannyMK2, bb37, hunter8793, GodSilla
59826 Registered Users
Who's Online
29 registered (carlprop, Bandito440, bbhero, AlanColorado, ABomb369, 3 invisible), 751 Guests and 14 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59826 Members
66 Forums
258069 Topics
4246451 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3425794 - 07/15/14 06:33 PM Duke engine......better design?
mcrn Offline


Registered: 11/30/05
Posts: 2963
Loc: FL
http://sploid.gizmodo.com/this-is-the-we...dium=socialflow

I searched and could not see that this had been previously posted.

Top
#3425852 - 07/15/14 07:22 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
sicko Offline


Registered: 09/22/08
Posts: 1699
Loc: Virginia
That first image is seriously cool to look at.


Top
#3425867 - 07/15/14 07:36 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
webfors Offline


Registered: 06/06/06
Posts: 4329
Loc: Great White North.. eh
Awesome! I would love to see this engine in production.
_________________________
15 Civic, AFE 0w20, FU OF
13 Dodge GC, VWB 5w20, Wix OF
15 DL650, Yam 10w40, OEM OF
Small engines; RT5 10w30

Top
#3425910 - 07/15/14 08:14 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
gregk24 Offline


Registered: 04/13/13
Posts: 4705
Loc: FL, USA
Wow, looks pretty cool. Not sure how reliable things would be though. Looks like it could have sealing issues.
_________________________
2012 Honda Accord EX-L
Taffeta White - Ivory
42,xxx miles

PPPP 0w20 / Fram Ultra

Top
#3425914 - 07/15/14 08:18 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 7356
Loc: beaver land EH?
mechanical complexity, coupled with sealing problems (just like wenkel engines), will plague this design in production mode.

Q.
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3425916 - 07/15/14 08:24 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: gregk24]
Nick1994 Offline


Registered: 02/19/13
Posts: 6976
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted By: gregk24
Wow, looks pretty cool. Not sure how reliable things would be though. Looks like it could have sealing issues.


That's what I thought. After many years of use, things are gonna start losing their pressure, metal will fatigue and the whole engine will need replaced. Interesting concept though.
_________________________
2000 Toyota Camry 2.2L 222k
Mobil 1 AFE 0w30 & Wix
1996 Jeep Cherokee 4.0L 141k
Mobil 1 HM 10w30 & Wix

Top
#3425949 - 07/15/14 08:46 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Win Offline


Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 4123
Loc: Arkansas
Looks like a wobble plate type of air conditioning compressor.

With spark plugs.
_________________________
09 Torrent 3.6 V6 M1 0/30
09 Solstice 2.4 I4 Fram 5/30
08 G8 3.6 V6 Fram 5/30
04 Xj8 4.2 V8 Hav 5/40
99 S-10 2.2 I4 RECOVERED
94 Xj12 6.0 V12

Top
#3425950 - 07/15/14 08:47 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Chris142 Offline


Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 14510
Loc: apple valley, ca
very similar to many a\c compressors
_________________________
02 Wrangler Chevron 10w30
87 F250 napa 15w40
04 Tahoe super-s 5w30
Z400 Lucas 10w30
KLR250 Maxima 10w40
Can am maveric edge 5w40

Top
#3425952 - 07/15/14 08:50 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Subdued Offline


Registered: 10/06/13
Posts: 641
Loc: Youngstown, NY
that's a technological terror if I've ever seen one
_________________________
2008 Chrysler Town & Country Touring 129k
2007 Toyota Yaris S 142k
2001 Toyota Corolla LE 159k
2001 Toyota Corolla CE 128k

Top
#3425979 - 07/15/14 09:11 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: Chris142]
scurvy Offline


Registered: 02/19/07
Posts: 2340
Loc: Chicago IL USA
Originally Posted By: Win
Looks like a wobble plate type of air conditioning compressor.

Originally Posted By: Chris142
very similar to many a\c compressors


Quite right. Same design as many existing AC compressors, which work beautifully. No reason it couldn't be adapted to work with spark or compression ignition.
_________________________
You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

06 VW Golf TDI: Schaeffer 9k 5w40, HU726/2x, EaBP90
12 Mazda 5: Amsoil SSO 0w20, FL910S

Top
#3426249 - 07/16/14 07:38 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: Win]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 14626
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
Originally Posted By: Win
Looks like a wobble plate type of air conditioning compressor.

With spark plugs.

Just did a Sanden and it looked just like this 7cyl.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3426363 - 07/16/14 10:32 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
just count the weight of the moving parts. that will tell you all you need to know.

Top
#3427006 - 07/16/14 09:39 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Ram01 Offline


Registered: 10/13/10
Posts: 916
Loc: New York Queens
Wonder what weight oil that motor takes

Top
#3427035 - 07/16/14 10:24 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Kiwi_ME Offline


Registered: 10/24/08
Posts: 1019
Loc: New Zealand
I should be patriotic but I think it's a nightmare too. Oddly the animated GIF shows the block stationary while the video shows it rotating, as it needs to, to move pistons past the ports and spark plugs. Perhaps the crank turns at twice head speed for a 4-stroke cycle.
Sealing the head under combustion pressure along with the complex machining of the wobble plate and con rods make it unattractive to me. And the touted advantages of balance and part count answer questions nobody has actually asked.

Compressors use this type of idea (wobble plate with a large number of small cylinders) to avoid pressure pulses in the input/output, hardly an issue in an IC engine where small cylinders have the disadvantage of high heat loss.

Top
#3427134 - 07/17/14 04:09 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
bruno Offline


Registered: 10/08/07
Posts: 468
Loc: new Jersey
Back in the '50s this was tried .... it was called a Swash Plate design . Fine for clean conditions like AC compressors but otherwise it was a dud .

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it's worth doing .


Edited by bruno (07/17/14 04:11 AM)

Top
#3429787 - 07/20/14 12:42 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: bruno]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 7356
Loc: beaver land EH?
Originally Posted By: bruno
Back in the '50s this was tried .... it was called a Swash Plate design . Fine for clean conditions like AC compressors but otherwise it was a dud .

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it's worth doing .


+1 with what Bruno said.

Remember: unlike sealed A/C compressor, which runs in a sealed, uncontaminated environment lubricated with compressor oil, etc. (which remains uncontaminated/not deteriorated) for a long, long time; exposing to fuel and air, and dirt in air (abrasion), combustion byproducts, blowby, moisture/condensation, etc. there will be no guarantee on how long/reliable such design would be, and also the inherent energy conversion efficiency also.

Just because it looks good in theory doesn't mean it would be meaningful/practical in real-life situation.

Afterall: we have been constantly refining/improving the venerable internal reciprocating combustion engine design for a century now, it would be challenging to start from scratch to design something even better...

I know it's not 100% impossible, but it would be challenging.

Q.
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3430544 - 07/20/14 07:38 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 34468
Loc: Oz

Top
#3433464 - 07/23/14 02:30 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
A_Harman Offline


Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 6138
Loc: Michigan
Google search barrel engines and read up on their long, unsuccessful history.
_________________________
1985 Z51 Corvette track car
2002 Camaro Z28 LS1/6-speed
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 diesel
1972 GMC 1500 shortbed project truck

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >