Recent Topics
RAM 1500 3.6l filter
by SavagePatch
02/20/17 11:49 PM
PPHM = thinner but less burn off?
by lukejo
02/20/17 10:54 PM
Replacement Front Struts
by garageman402
02/20/17 10:52 PM
2003 Dodge Caravan with rusty looking coolant
by Oldtom
02/20/17 10:28 PM
Cleaning bronze bore brushes and wire brushes
by Triple_Se7en
02/20/17 09:10 PM
Where can I get oil sample testing done?
by FlyingTexan
02/20/17 08:45 PM
missing/stuck open thermostat?
by RichardS
02/20/17 08:43 PM
Serpentine belt on 2001 Duratec 3.0
by spk2000
02/20/17 08:24 PM
Pick my oil filter
by Mathew_Boss
02/20/17 07:56 PM
Rural King
by roadrunner1
02/20/17 07:50 PM
Using WMC + EyeTV One
by sleddriver
02/20/17 07:44 PM
Oil Change - Lubeguard Flush
by coopns
02/20/17 07:21 PM
Spark Plug of Choice on OPE
by chefwong
02/20/17 06:40 PM
no electric cars, no hydrogen cars, how about air?
by OneEyeJack
02/20/17 06:03 PM
My 1st LML UOA.... need input plz
by 496BB
02/20/17 06:02 PM
Polishing rims?
by Nissan101
02/20/17 05:33 PM
Hot Water Tank - Galvanic Corrosion
by larryinnewyork
02/20/17 05:14 PM
UOA Rotella T6 5W-40 6.0 PSD
by SqFeath
02/20/17 04:00 PM
Replace clutch fork?
by buck91
02/20/17 03:44 PM
Oil for a 2000 Chrysler LHS
by Dumc87
02/20/17 03:40 PM
Newest Members
Jetfccrew, John7109, trentreznor321, DellS, NZwogboy
60591 Registered Users
Who's Online
23 registered (Andyge, Brad_C, c502cid, carviewsonic, CKN, Atesz792, 2 invisible), 826 Guests and 17 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
60591 Members
66 Forums
261344 Topics
4310970 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3424170 - 07/14/14 08:31 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: Miller88]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5029
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.


catch cans do nothing for preventing intake valve deposits if that is what you are going for. This has been shown time and time again on different forums out there.

Catch cans are for increasing the octane rating of your AF mixture when you are running an agressive tune and pushing the limits. The PCV vapors lower the octane just enough for agressive tunes that it can cause detonation. They don't remove enough vapor to prevent valve deposits, though.

Here are the valves of someone who cleaned their valves, installed a BSH catch can hoping for results:



Edited by badtlc (07/14/14 08:32 AM)
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 145k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 55k+

Top
#3424189 - 07/14/14 08:57 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: badtlc]
Miller88 Offline


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 11785
Loc: Onondaga County
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.


I'd put it on now, and take it off if there's a problem while its under warranty and has to go in for service. That is unless they bring it to the dealer for service, something I don't do. My thinking is if the catch can is going to be of any benefit long term, why wait until the warranty is up? Just thinking out loud.


They do dealer service. Can't really beat $25 for an synblend oil change that someone else is doing.


Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.


catch cans do nothing for preventing intake valve deposits if that is what you are going for. This has been shown time and time again on different forums out there.

Catch cans are for increasing the octane rating of your AF mixture when you are running an agressive tune and pushing the limits. The PCV vapors lower the octane just enough for agressive tunes that it can cause detonation. They don't remove enough vapor to prevent valve deposits, though.

Here are the valves of someone who cleaned their valves, installed a BSH catch can hoping for results:



Wouldn't the catch can keep the pcv vapors from entering the intake? What about just sticking a filter on and venting it out into the open?
_________________________
Quote:
A Lada with manually adjusted drum brakes sounds like a fantastic car.

Top
#3424211 - 07/14/14 09:30 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: Miller88]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5029
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Miller88


Wouldn't the catch can keep the pcv vapors from entering the intake? What about just sticking a filter on and venting it out into the open?


Removing PCV from the intake is the only sure fire way.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 145k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 55k+

Top
#3424222 - 07/14/14 09:50 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: Miller88]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 26792
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: Miller88
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.


I'd put it on now, and take it off if there's a problem while its under warranty and has to go in for service. That is unless they bring it to the dealer for service, something I don't do. My thinking is if the catch can is going to be of any benefit long term, why wait until the warranty is up? Just thinking out loud.


They do dealer service. Can't really beat $25 for an synblend oil change that someone else is doing.



I'd pass on the catch can then.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3424357 - 07/14/14 12:20 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: itguy08]
bdcardinal Offline


Registered: 06/03/05
Posts: 9463
Loc: Santa Barbara, CA
Originally Posted By: klt1986
There were not any parts available...whatever happened Ford wanted the rear end replaced as a unit.


Individual parts are not available for those rear end assemblies. They are only serviced in a complete assembly. A lot of the rear drive units on the AWD vehicles are like that.
_________________________
2014 Ford Mustang GT Track Pack
1995 Ford Mustang GT

Ford/Mazda Parts Counter
NRA Benefactor Member
Opinions expressed are my own.

Top
#3424837 - 07/14/14 07:41 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: badtlc]
ukmastermind Offline


Registered: 08/07/12
Posts: 111
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
What car is that??
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.


catch cans do nothing for preventing intake valve deposits if that is what you are going for. This has been shown time and time again on different forums out there.

Catch cans are for increasing the octane rating of your AF mixture when you are running an agressive tune and pushing the limits. The PCV vapors lower the octane just enough for agressive tunes that it can cause detonation. They don't remove enough vapor to prevent valve deposits, though.

Here are the valves of someone who cleaned their valves, installed a BSH catch can hoping for results:

Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.


catch cans do nothing for preventing intake valve deposits if that is what you are going for. This has been shown time and time again on different forums out there.

Catch cans are for increasing the octane rating of your AF mixture when you are running an agressive tune and pushing the limits. The PCV vapors lower the octane just enough for agressive tunes that it can cause detonation. They don't remove enough vapor to prevent valve deposits, though.

Here are the valves of someone who cleaned their valves, installed a BSH catch can hoping for results:


Top
#3424909 - 07/14/14 08:27 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 7180
Loc: CT
Turbo charged motors have been around for a long time, back in the 80's Volvo, Saab, and Porsche had them pretty well figured out.

I'd have no heartburn buying one. Just stay on top of the oil.

OTOH I think the average person who does not stay on top of maintenance will find ownership expensive. They are not as tolerant as NA motors are of abuse.


Edited by hattaresguy (07/14/14 08:27 PM)

Top
#3425060 - 07/14/14 10:46 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: hattaresguy]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 8361
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
I agree with this.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#3427537 - 07/17/14 12:53 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: badtlc]
wtd Offline


Registered: 06/25/02
Posts: 1739
Loc: southwest Mo.
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.


catch cans do nothing for preventing intake valve deposits if that is what you are going for. This has been shown time and time again on different forums out there.

Catch cans are for increasing the octane rating of your AF mixture when you are running an agressive tune and pushing the limits. The PCV vapors lower the octane just enough for agressive tunes that it can cause detonation. They don't remove enough vapor to prevent valve deposits, though.

Here are the valves of someone who cleaned their valves, installed a BSH catch can hoping for results:



You also have to realize that not all catch cans are as effective as others. There are quite a few cans out there that still let a lot of oil through to the intake. The manufacturer of RX catch cans claims that their cans capture 95%+ of oil and contaminants and have done quite a bit of testing with ecoboost vehicles, I think mostly the F150. Go to f150.com and they have some various threads on this issue and catch cans.
_________________________
2014 Mustang GT
1998 Chevy K3500
1998 Chevy K1500
(2) 1992 Cavaliers
1970 Monte Carlo

Top
#3427843 - 07/17/14 06:38 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
sciphi Offline


Registered: 03/24/07
Posts: 9985
Loc: Upstate NY
Turbos have been around for a long time. I'd trust a major OEM like Ford to get it right, especially in a truck.

My turbo (but not DI) Cruze is doing fine at 89k miles, most of those highway miles at 55-60 mph.
_________________________
2013 Toyota RAV4 XLE
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco

Top
#3428800 - 07/18/14 09:12 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 7180
Loc: CT
You guys are also assuming those valve deposits mean something. Most EGR diesels have valves like that and they run fine forever.

Those deposits might mean nothing and the motor will perform to design specifications for its service life with them looking just like that.


Edited by hattaresguy (07/18/14 09:12 PM)

Top
#3428896 - 07/18/14 10:50 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
TiredTrucker Offline


Registered: 01/04/08
Posts: 2892
Loc: Central Iowa
It probably is a sure thing that a catch can won't catch everything, but the right can will catch a mighty amount of gunk that would have went to the intake. The catch can I have on my 5.3L in my Silverado captured enough in 13,000 miles to fill a 16 oz drinking water bottle to the top. So it prevented at least a half quart of oil and condensation from pooling up in the intake manifold, and just that much less crud not making it to the valves.

It may not be the cure all, end all for everything that ails an engine, but it sure seems like a worthy addition. I understand how some feel it is not necessary, in theory, but for the reality I have to face with my vehicle, it was a good addition.
_________________________
Freedom is not about having the choice to do what you want, but the choice to do what you ought.

Top
#3429051 - 07/19/14 07:09 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: sciphi]
rjundi Offline


Registered: 03/16/04
Posts: 7256
Loc: USA
Originally Posted By: sciphi
Turbos have been around for a long time. I'd trust a major OEM like Ford to get it right, especially in a truck.

My turbo (but not DI) Cruze is doing fine at 89k miles, most of those highway miles at 55-60 mph.


A lot more to turbo's then the part itself. Subaru has been doing it forever(1980ish) but mucked up tuning on my specific model(legacy gt/outback xt 2.5L) leading to this(burned valves):


My turbo is perfect though!! Interestingly the tuned Subaru's do not suffer this fate apparently so Subaru mucked up factory tune is a likely culprit.
_________________________
---

Top
#3429084 - 07/19/14 07:41 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
sciphi Offline


Registered: 03/24/07
Posts: 9985
Loc: Upstate NY
True, tuning does play a large part in how reliable the engine is. I hope that the OEM's would stand behind the products they sell. Although that's up to the dealer first, and not every dealer is equal.
_________________________
2013 Toyota RAV4 XLE
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco

Top
#3429213 - 07/19/14 10:58 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: TiredTrucker]
Nate1979 Online   content


Registered: 04/08/13
Posts: 3482
Loc: Portland, OR
Originally Posted By: TiredTrucker
It probably is a sure thing that a catch can won't catch everything, but the right can will catch a mighty amount of gunk that would have went to the intake. The catch can I have on my 5.3L in my Silverado captured enough in 13,000 miles to fill a 16 oz drinking water bottle to the top. So it prevented at least a half quart of oil and condensation from pooling up in the intake manifold, and just that much less crud not making it to the valves.

It may not be the cure all, end all for everything that ails an engine, but it sure seems like a worthy addition. I understand how some feel it is not necessary, in theory, but for the reality I have to face with my vehicle, it was a good addition.

Was that in the summer or winter? I recently installed a catch can (Conceptual Polymer brand) on my Silverado but dont catch nearly as much as you.
_________________________
2015 GMC Sierra 2500 6.0L
2010 Subaru Forester 2.5X

Top
Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >