Recent Topics
You think your rush hour is bad?
by StevieC
41 minutes 33 seconds ago
Wow, that's some view
by StevieC
49 minutes 1 second ago
Friction Modifier
by TalNum
52 minutes 56 seconds ago
Foam pre air filter in Powerstroke.
by Donald
Today at 01:07 PM
Fun with Marbles
by StevieC
Today at 12:54 PM
Help, Movie streaming on TV (Canada)
by expat
Today at 12:13 PM
Excessive battery terminal corrosion
by Kestas
Today at 11:51 AM
Soot
by bigj_16
Today at 11:02 AM
Which M1 HM to use for winter?
by car51
Today at 10:48 AM
Manual Transmissions and DI/GDI engine issues
by Speak2Mountain
Today at 10:22 AM
Why would a short OCI clean better?
by MoreCowbellAz
Today at 10:21 AM
Where are the awesome first time lease deals?
by ZZman
Today at 10:14 AM
2001 Dodge 2500, 388k miles, 36k OCI on RT6
by A_Harman
Today at 10:04 AM
Costco Michelin X-Tour tire review
by Cujet
Today at 09:56 AM
How is Bitog Pronouced?
by rollinpete
Today at 09:56 AM
Cracked Head *pics*
by tomcruise
Today at 09:21 AM
Schaeffer Application Question
by Gebo
Today at 09:10 AM
Cayenne drain plug obstruction
by pda1122
Today at 08:15 AM
Castrol Woobie
by 07Piloteer
Today at 07:30 AM
1987 Toyota 22R 148KMi Valve cover pics
by Jason_Michaels
Today at 07:17 AM
Newest Members
Two_Shoes, bigcmaple, Liebex, Techneek, bsmith6356
63176 Registered Users
Who's Online
66 registered (2015_PSD, asisensei, Astro14, Audios, ABerns, Audioquest, 5 invisible), 2360 Guests and 11 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
63176 Members
66 Forums
272560 Topics
4525252 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3422771 - 07/12/14 04:00 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
itguy08 Offline


Registered: 09/15/11
Posts: 2930
Loc: Somewhere
Love both of mine.

One has been since new and 76k later nothing out of a knock sensor for the engine. Lots of power, decent fuel economy (for a 4500LB AWD sedan), and no oil consumption, turbo, or other issues with it. I fill it up with the cheapest swill I can find, change the oil at the dealer when the OLM either comes on or gets close. I did change the plugs at 75k and that's it.

The truck, got it with 43k in January, it now has 49k and no oil consumption or anything. But not really much other than that as far as history.

I fully expect at least 200k out of them both without major repairs.

I wouldn't worry - Ford has put out well over 600k of them since the middle of 2009 and failures are few and far between. I'm more worried about the 6F55 in the SHO than the Ecoboost. Although it too has given me no issues and I change the fluid every 30k.


Edited by itguy08 (07/12/14 04:02 PM)

Top
#3422778 - 07/12/14 04:13 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
TiredTrucker Offline


Registered: 01/04/08
Posts: 3165
Loc: Central Iowa
We are in the 21st century and it seems ridiculous that something like the ecoboost is out of the norm and we are still playing with naturally aspirated engines. Just about everything at this point should be turbo or supercharged. Naturally aspirated diesels in vehicles are so old school and not even offered in new stuff, just not sure why gasoline hasn't gone the same route. N/A engines should be confined to kit mods, restorations, and museums. Sure the cost would be more, but in mass production the costs drop dramatically compared to aftermarket.
_________________________
Freedom is not about having the choice to do what you want, but the choice to do what you ought.

Top
#3422792 - 07/12/14 04:30 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Nick R Offline


Registered: 07/14/09
Posts: 11133
Loc: Albany, NY
I would have no issues with an ecoboost vehicle. Some people are luddites and afraid of change. I'm not. We almost got a Ford f-150 ecoboost when I got my focus. We ended up with the traverse instead and have been very happy with it. But if you want an engine with lots of torque, and decent fuel economy, and a lot of go power, you can't really go wrong imo.
_________________________
2013 Ford Focus SE 2.0L/85,000miles/Valvoline Synpower 0W-20/MC FL400S

Top
#3423238 - 07/13/14 01:44 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 8399
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
This guy is trolling for some cash. Rubes believe anything.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#3423255 - 07/13/14 05:03 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 28303
Loc: NY
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines. I'm still not ready to gamble with one, and I'm a big FMC fan. In another year or two I'd consider one. Fortunately for me, I want a new vehicle I don't need one.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3423447 - 07/13/14 11:50 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: demarpaint]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 18570
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines. I'm still not ready to gamble with one, and I'm a big FMC fan. In another year or two I'd consider one. Fortunately for me, I want a new vehicle I don't need one.


Major mfgrs have used us as the guinea pigs for a long time now, we always should thank the early adopters! But the EB is already pretty much proven viable, it just has some glitches under particular duty cycles. The failure rate on the V6 is quite low and it's only the 4 bangers that have had some issues, we all know about the old V6 intercooler woes, that's all over now.

It's always nice to let that new tech be thoroughly tested before spending your hard earned money...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3423595 - 07/13/14 03:36 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: demarpaint]
itguy08 Offline


Registered: 09/15/11
Posts: 2930
Loc: Somewhere
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines.


Just curious what? The 3.5 is solid with the exception it likes plugs every 40-50k or so. The F150 had intercooler issues but those are pretty much over now.

I know people complain about the fuel economy but that's about to be expected. Drive it hard and it's about the same as a 7.0 liter engine. Drive it sanely and you will get decent economy. I've seen 26 MPG in long highway with the SHO and with the F150 the average is about 17 (it has max tow, 4x4, and 3.73's). The SHO is fine by me and the F150 is about to be expected with the gearing it has.

Top
#3423890 - 07/13/14 09:13 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: itguy08]
klt1986 Offline


Registered: 04/08/09
Posts: 215
Loc: Southern VA
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines.


Just curious what? The 3.5 is solid with the exception it likes plugs every 40-50k or so. The F150 had intercooler issues but those are pretty much over now.

I know people complain about the fuel economy but that's about to be expected. Drive it hard and it's about the same as a 7.0 liter engine. Drive it sanely and you will get decent economy. I've seen 26 MPG in long highway with the SHO and with the F150 the average is about 17 (it has max tow, 4x4, and 3.73's). The SHO is fine by me and the F150 is about to be expected with the gearing it has.



Major oil consumption/smoking issues in the Interceptors here locally. Also transmission and rear end issues as well. One Interceptor was down for over 30 days awaiting a new rear end from Ford. There were not any parts available...whatever happened Ford wanted the rear end replaced as a unit.

I love the power the EB engine makes in these cars...the performance really is light years ahead of the Crown Vic PI's. However, long term durability under severe service may be an issue for this engine.



Edited by klt1986 (07/13/14 09:15 PM)

Top
#3424003 - 07/13/14 11:27 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: klt1986]
ukmastermind Offline


Registered: 08/07/12
Posts: 111
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
I'm going to start collecting Walnut Shells just in case my buddies EB engine clogs up!
Walnut Shells and Dirty Intake Valves

Top
#3424062 - 07/14/14 05:05 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: klt1986]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 18570
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: klt1986
However, long term durability under severe service may be an issue for this engine.


I think that is precisely why Demarpaint and I agree that these get a little more R&D from those brave 'early adopters'!
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3424074 - 07/14/14 05:57 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 28303
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines.


Just curious what?


Pretty much what was already mentioned in this thread.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3424119 - 07/14/14 07:23 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: klt1986]
itguy08 Offline


Registered: 09/15/11
Posts: 2930
Loc: Somewhere
Originally Posted By: klt1986

Major oil consumption/smoking issues in the Interceptors here locally. Also transmission and rear end issues as well. One Interceptor was down for over 30 days awaiting a new rear end from Ford. There were not any parts available...whatever happened Ford wanted the rear end replaced as a unit.

I love the power the EB engine makes in these cars...the performance really is light years ahead of the Crown Vic PI's. However, long term durability under severe service may be an issue for this engine.


Thanks.

There is a new TSB out and new parts for the smoking issue. And it goes all the way back to the 2010 EB in the cars so that may be something that was bad design.

I've heard that the rear in that platform (SHO/Flex/Explorer) is an integrated unit with the clutches and such built into the rear so that may be why it needs to be replaced as a unit rather than a rebuild. Either way I don't think I'd classify a rear end or even transmission a fault with the engine.

I would have hoped that with the Law Enforcement contracts, Ford would have done tons of testing on them but it seems like something slipped through the cracks. They better get it sorted or risk loosing LOTS of sales!

Top
#3424129 - 07/14/14 07:33 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: ukmastermind]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5108
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: ukmastermind
I'm going to start collecting Walnut Shells just in case my buddies EB engine clogs up!
Walnut Shells and Dirty Intake Valves


If your friend's EB clogs up then he isn't getting it hot enough every now and then:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFfRcwesqNg
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Formula Shell 5W30, Fram TG, 155k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 60k+, PP 5w30, Fram OF

Top
#3424143 - 07/14/14 07:44 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Miller88 Offline


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 12259
Loc: Onondaga County
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.
_________________________
I don't have nice things for a reason

Top
#3424150 - 07/14/14 07:55 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: Miller88]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 28303
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.


I'd put it on now, and take it off if there's a problem while its under warranty and has to go in for service. That is unless they bring it to the dealer for service, something I don't do. My thinking is if the catch can is going to be of any benefit long term, why wait until the warranty is up? Just thinking out loud.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >