Recent Topics
Found a use for the Lubegard Biotech/0w20 Edge
by Marco620
09/30/16 11:59 PM
Whats in your oil stash?
by Farmer
09/30/16 10:55 PM
350z Junker
by FranklinJL
09/30/16 10:53 PM
Oil for high-miles 2009 Hyundai Accent?
by cbuck
09/30/16 08:53 PM
New Spark Plugs in 2010 Accord
by Phishin
09/30/16 08:52 PM
West Virginia
by car51
09/30/16 08:02 PM
Broken bolt from brake caliper Buick Park Ave
by GerGa
09/30/16 07:47 PM
Valve Cover Gasket and Tranny Fluid Question
by THafeez
09/30/16 07:43 PM
Oil Recommendation
by BkOB
09/30/16 07:32 PM
U-Verse Elite (6Mbps)
by PandaBear
09/30/16 07:22 PM
chinese filter
by mobilaltima
09/30/16 05:00 PM
Interesting find: Petro Canada Duron XL 15W40
by alex_at
09/30/16 04:40 PM
Newest Members
Gunnman, jtoz, Jeff_Ferg, Kaiser, DanielStone
59229 Registered Users
Who's Online
17 registered (eljefino, Falken, edhackett, 4WD, AnthemBassMan, 1 invisible), 721 Guests and 14 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59229 Members
66 Forums
255118 Topics
4191284 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#3401022 - 06/18/14 09:51 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: Falcon_LS]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 8258
Loc: Florida
Originally Posted By: Falcon_LS
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT
All I can say is, I'm glad they're taking it seriously now. I'll give GM credit for that.


I'm glad someone else looks at it the same way. Instead of hiding it under the bed sheets, they're taking responsibility for their actions in the past and doing something about it.

If they really cared that much, they would have gone back, and recalled most of their V6 engines that have weak intake manifold gaskets.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3401043 - 06/18/14 10:06 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
FetchFar Offline


Registered: 10/17/13
Posts: 831
Loc: Colorado
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.
_________________________
'07 BMW 530xi N52 engine, E60 chassis, 255 hp
'11 Chevy Camaro LS, 3.6L V6, Zeta chassis, 312 hp
'40 Chevrolet Special Deluxe 2-Door Town Sedan

Top
#3401187 - 06/19/14 05:14 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: FetchFar]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 17765
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: FetchFar
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.


Interesting dichotomy, eh? And with 9 of the 13 reported incidents suggesting driver impairment in decade old car, too.

Absolute baloney as far as I'm concerned...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3401226 - 06/19/14 07:12 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
supton Offline


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 9118
Loc: NH
I don't know about being "complete" baloney but it does underscore how many things have to go wrong. Bad switch, too many keys on the ring, bad driver and bad luck. Remove any one of them, and voila! no incidents.
_________________________
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 6spd manual, 121k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra double cab, 4.6L, auto, 132k, his

Top
#3401499 - 06/19/14 12:58 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
Win Offline


Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 4068
Loc: Arkansas
I'll say this for them - they're persistent to the point of driving me batty with recall notices on the ignition cylinder for the Solstice.

They've sent at least two letters to the lake house, which is the address I used for the purchase of the car.

They've figured out I have another address for the other Pontiacs, and have sent letters there.

The other day I got an e mail about it.

Now, I'm getting postcards from the dealer about the recall.

I think it's been almost two years since the car has moved from the garage, so I don't have much interest in getting it out just for this recall (GM knows this too - the OnStar subscription is still active).

Particularly when the switch works just fine.

I understand erring on the side of caution, but this seems really overblown.
_________________________
09 Torrent 3.6 V6 M1 0/30
09 Solstice 2.4 I4 Fram 5/30
08 G8 3.6 V6 Fram 5/30
04 Xj8 4.2 V8 Hav 5/40
99 S-10 2.2 I4 RECOVERED
94 Xj12 6.0 V12

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3