Recent Topics
Problems with GM 2.4 Ecotec Motors?
by tc1446
19 minutes 22 seconds ago
Nexen Aria AH-7
by pbm
50 minutes 44 seconds ago
Mobil 1 M1-xxx and M1-xxxA difference
by Gokhan
Today at 04:18 AM
IPONE - Anybody know this Brand?
by ChristianReske
Today at 04:15 AM
New Jeep Renegade Owners
by RazorsEdge
Today at 03:18 AM
Battery with lower cca than the factory battery
by ram_man
Today at 01:27 AM
I bought way too much oil.
by johnnylove
Today at 01:03 AM
Purolator Boss PBL22500 - Cut Open
by AMC
Today at 12:09 AM
when did rotella switch to CK-4?
by motor_oil_madman
Yesterday at 10:16 PM
Alternatives to CK-4
by motor_oil_madman
Yesterday at 09:45 PM
Buying grandsons pickup (yes I'm insane)
by kafka45
Yesterday at 08:34 PM
Help!
by Mathew_Boss
Yesterday at 07:43 PM
Fram CA5057 air filter discontinued?
by TFBird
Yesterday at 06:44 PM
low cost pressure washer
by bmwjohn
Yesterday at 06:25 PM
Mixing different brands of 0W-20 Full Synthetic
by TheBus36
Yesterday at 06:19 PM
The operation failed
by DannyWatts
Yesterday at 06:11 PM
RIP Gregg Allman
by Jimmy9190
Yesterday at 06:09 PM
The city I grew up in
by Bluestream
Yesterday at 05:54 PM
Brutal Heat & Humidity...
by sleddriver
Yesterday at 05:07 PM
Interesting currency find
by car51
Yesterday at 04:40 PM
Newest Members
johnnylove, lwb, cooke66, W3DRK, Angelduro
61677 Registered Users
Who's Online
57 registered (bdcardinal, billt460, Astro14, 1foxracing, bandz7, 5 invisible), 1584 Guests and 16 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
61677 Members
66 Forums
265700 Topics
4391073 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3396636 - 06/13/14 02:10 PM basic home test of Star Tron....
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5067
Loc: KC
http://www.thehulltruth.com/boating-forum/430716-ethanol-sludge-unscientific-startron-test.html

Since people seem to be into testing from users lately, maybe some would be interested in this one.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Formula Shell 5W30, Fram TG, 150k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 55k+, Mag1 0W20, Fram OF

Top
#3396650 - 06/13/14 02:25 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 4781
Loc: USA
Something is wrong,cant get into that page.Must be sludged up...

Top
#3396673 - 06/13/14 02:45 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Donald Online   content


Registered: 03/21/04
Posts: 18525
Loc: Upstate NY
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.
_________________________
2015 Subaru Forester 2.5 engine/CVT
2015 Ford F250 w/Powerstroke
2016 Subaru Crosstrek CVT (wife's)


Top
#3396675 - 06/13/14 02:47 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: Donald]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5067
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.


It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Formula Shell 5W30, Fram TG, 150k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 55k+, Mag1 0W20, Fram OF

Top
#3396785 - 06/13/14 04:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3396891 - 06/13/14 07:06 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: dave5358]
GatorJ Offline


Registered: 07/24/03
Posts: 180
Loc: Tampa
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.


Or obtuse.

Top
#3397262 - 06/14/14 08:38 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
05LGTLtd Offline


Registered: 03/04/13
Posts: 1019
Loc: Va
The first thing I would question is why would you test an additive at full strength, especially on that claims to be an 'enzyme' additive. It's designed to work diluted with gasoline, why not do the bench test with a mix?

I use StarTron in an older vehicle and my OPE regularly. I don't expect miracles, but so far no problems with it for me. I started a thread a while back asking if any of the chemists here on the board could give some insight on the enzyme additive and never heard much...

Top
#3397267 - 06/14/14 08:48 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 15908
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
The marinas i do work for claim it hasn't helped with their ethanol issues.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3398410 - 06/15/14 07:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

Top
#3398440 - 06/15/14 08:04 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: morris]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: morris
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

As opposed to an unreal test? Double blind testing is frequently done with test medications: both the patient and the person administering the drug don't know if the pill is the real drug or a placebo. Hence, 'double blind'.

If you were testing an engine or an additive or some mechanical device, you might be better off keeping both eyes open. The only possible need for a double blind test would be a situation in which the test operator could materially influence the results, or if you planned to simply asked the operator for his opinion ("yeah, it ran great!"). If you can measure the results more objectively (more mpg per the ECU, greater cylinder pressure per the pressure gauge, less fuel used based on pump records) there is little need for a double blind test.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top