Recent Topics
2016 Nissan Versa Note
by Anduril
3 minutes 50 seconds ago
Acura TB replacement - 105k or 84 months?
by artbuc
Today at 02:56 AM
next pistol idea
by bowlofturtle
Today at 12:01 AM
ACDelco or Fel-Pro ?
by Merkava_4
Yesterday at 11:57 PM
Meijer ad
by a1mfw
Yesterday at 11:40 PM
Valvoline maxlife antifreeze sale at Menards.
by a1mfw
Yesterday at 11:29 PM
Dorman vs AC Delco
by Hollow
Yesterday at 11:14 PM
Which struts will take a better beating?
by daves87rs
Yesterday at 11:10 PM
catch can.
by hemitruck
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Looking for Petroluem Service Company Codes?
by sgtrockjoe
Yesterday at 10:30 PM
Saw a cop nearly rear end a car the other day.
by motor_oil_madman
Yesterday at 10:27 PM
Recent Wix order from Rock Auto (regular inventory
by slacktide_bitog
Yesterday at 10:24 PM
Air compressor
by NStuart
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Walmart Dexron VI is a licensed product east coast
by slacktide_bitog
Yesterday at 09:51 PM
Oil filter advice for Toyota Matrix 2ZRFE
by Dumc87
Yesterday at 09:07 PM
Happy B-day Joey Dunlop
by 02SE
Yesterday at 08:52 PM
Valvetrain pics - Pontiac Vibe
by dgunay
Yesterday at 08:46 PM
TCW 3 in 4 stroke gas
by Birdman476
Yesterday at 08:11 PM
Oil advice for a 1996 Land Cruiser
by HolyOilSeeker
Yesterday at 05:54 PM
C/O 12k Km OCI M1 M108 Winter
by Stewie
Yesterday at 05:50 PM
Newest Members
benhen77, HillMech, Letsrunum, dblotii, crookedaxle
60648 Registered Users
Who's Online
19 registered (Anduril, bandz7, 4WD, Ducked, dustyroads, hpb, 1 invisible), 630 Guests and 14 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
60648 Members
66 Forums
261573 Topics
4315501 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3396636 - 06/13/14 02:10 PM basic home test of Star Tron....
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5029
Loc: KC
http://www.thehulltruth.com/boating-forum/430716-ethanol-sludge-unscientific-startron-test.html

Since people seem to be into testing from users lately, maybe some would be interested in this one.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 145k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 55k+

Top
#3396650 - 06/13/14 02:25 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 4744
Loc: USA
Something is wrong,cant get into that page.Must be sludged up...

Top
#3396673 - 06/13/14 02:45 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Donald Offline


Registered: 03/21/04
Posts: 18036
Loc: Upstate NY
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.
_________________________
2015 Subaru Forester 2.5 engine/CVT
2015 Ford F250 w/Powerstroke
2016 Subaru Crosstrek CVT (wife's)


Top
#3396675 - 06/13/14 02:47 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: Donald]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5029
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.


It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 145k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 55k+

Top
#3396785 - 06/13/14 04:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3396891 - 06/13/14 07:06 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: dave5358]
GatorJ Offline


Registered: 07/24/03
Posts: 180
Loc: Tampa
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.


Or obtuse.

Top
#3397262 - 06/14/14 08:38 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
05LGTLtd Offline


Registered: 03/04/13
Posts: 1019
Loc: Va
The first thing I would question is why would you test an additive at full strength, especially on that claims to be an 'enzyme' additive. It's designed to work diluted with gasoline, why not do the bench test with a mix?

I use StarTron in an older vehicle and my OPE regularly. I don't expect miracles, but so far no problems with it for me. I started a thread a while back asking if any of the chemists here on the board could give some insight on the enzyme additive and never heard much...

Top
#3397267 - 06/14/14 08:48 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 15141
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
The marinas i do work for claim it hasn't helped with their ethanol issues.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3398410 - 06/15/14 07:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

Top
#3398440 - 06/15/14 08:04 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: morris]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: morris
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

As opposed to an unreal test? Double blind testing is frequently done with test medications: both the patient and the person administering the drug don't know if the pill is the real drug or a placebo. Hence, 'double blind'.

If you were testing an engine or an additive or some mechanical device, you might be better off keeping both eyes open. The only possible need for a double blind test would be a situation in which the test operator could materially influence the results, or if you planned to simply asked the operator for his opinion ("yeah, it ran great!"). If you can measure the results more objectively (more mpg per the ECU, greater cylinder pressure per the pressure gauge, less fuel used based on pump records) there is little need for a double blind test.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top