Recent Topics
What type of oil comes in a 2017 Silverado ?
by mtlineman
09/23/17 05:38 PM
2016 FLTRU Amsoil MCV 20W50, 5229 miles
by nocarb
09/23/17 05:31 PM
Pennzoil HM Oil At WM
by BlueOvalFitter
09/23/17 05:18 PM
Sorry for beating a dead horse concerning BC 0w40!
by MichaelDCRogers
09/23/17 05:15 PM
FOG vs Driving lights
by Eddie
09/23/17 04:36 PM
Cell Phone for a Trip
by sleddriver
09/23/17 04:21 PM
The richest woman on earth drives a
by skyactiv
09/23/17 04:20 PM
Flush or drain coolant
by jimbrewer
09/23/17 03:30 PM
Nanotechnology and Magnets clean up Oil spills
by Pajero
09/23/17 03:14 PM
2.2 Ecotec cartridge filter news
by slacktide_bitog
09/23/17 02:49 PM
To Glove or not to Glove. That is the question
by ZZman
09/23/17 02:35 PM
Napa Gold 1315 (Wix 51315) with 7k on a 2002 Focus
by slacktide_bitog
09/23/17 02:03 PM
Heater may be contributing to low temperature
by ford46guy
09/23/17 01:57 PM
Schaeffer Question
by Gebo
09/23/17 01:44 PM
K&N Filter Cut Open. Endcap Failure.
by 5AcresAndAFool
09/23/17 01:37 PM
Any interest in VOA of Carquest 5w40 HDEO FLEET?
by car51
09/23/17 01:34 PM
A Couple Of Good, (But Dated), F-15 Videos
by billt460
09/23/17 01:21 PM
Lube for larger marine diesels
by DeepFriar
09/23/17 01:03 PM
Jalopniks why expensive oil is a wate of money
by 97prizm
09/23/17 12:58 PM
2012 Honda Fit fog light replacement...good site
by M1Accord
09/23/17 12:48 PM
Newest Members
EchoThat300K, BlissStation, HarrisJ, jdsco, rykar
62919 Registered Users
Who's Online
76 registered (Astro14, AandPDan, 4WD, ATex7239, 555, 9 invisible), 1990 Guests and 13 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
62919 Members
66 Forums
271271 Topics
4499258 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3396636 - 06/13/14 02:10 PM basic home test of Star Tron....
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5104
Loc: KC
http://www.thehulltruth.com/boating-forum/430716-ethanol-sludge-unscientific-startron-test.html

Since people seem to be into testing from users lately, maybe some would be interested in this one.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Formula Shell 5W30, Fram TG, 155k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 60k+, PP 5w30, Fram OF

Top
#3396650 - 06/13/14 02:25 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 4903
Loc: USA
Something is wrong,cant get into that page.Must be sludged up...

Top
#3396673 - 06/13/14 02:45 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Donald Offline


Registered: 03/21/04
Posts: 19214
Loc: Upstate NY
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.
_________________________
2015 Subaru Forester 2.5 engine/CVT
2015 Ford F250 w/Powerstroke
2016 Subaru Crosstrek CVT (wife's)


Top
#3396675 - 06/13/14 02:47 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: Donald]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5104
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.


It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Formula Shell 5W30, Fram TG, 155k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 60k+, PP 5w30, Fram OF

Top
#3396785 - 06/13/14 04:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3396891 - 06/13/14 07:06 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: dave5358]
GatorJ Offline


Registered: 07/24/03
Posts: 180
Loc: Tampa
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.


Or obtuse.

Top
#3397262 - 06/14/14 08:38 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
05LGTLtd Offline


Registered: 03/04/13
Posts: 1019
Loc: Va
The first thing I would question is why would you test an additive at full strength, especially on that claims to be an 'enzyme' additive. It's designed to work diluted with gasoline, why not do the bench test with a mix?

I use StarTron in an older vehicle and my OPE regularly. I don't expect miracles, but so far no problems with it for me. I started a thread a while back asking if any of the chemists here on the board could give some insight on the enzyme additive and never heard much...

Top
#3397267 - 06/14/14 08:48 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 16433
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
The marinas i do work for claim it hasn't helped with their ethanol issues.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3398410 - 06/15/14 07:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

Top
#3398440 - 06/15/14 08:04 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: morris]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: morris
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

As opposed to an unreal test? Double blind testing is frequently done with test medications: both the patient and the person administering the drug don't know if the pill is the real drug or a placebo. Hence, 'double blind'.

If you were testing an engine or an additive or some mechanical device, you might be better off keeping both eyes open. The only possible need for a double blind test would be a situation in which the test operator could materially influence the results, or if you planned to simply asked the operator for his opinion ("yeah, it ran great!"). If you can measure the results more objectively (more mpg per the ECU, greater cylinder pressure per the pressure gauge, less fuel used based on pump records) there is little need for a double blind test.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top