Recent Topics
Break in...kind of
by stuka
05/24/17 12:35 PM
Fuel economy of oil not so simple?
by TheKracken
05/24/17 12:35 PM
1999 Infiniti I30, UOA ATF, 131k
by DzoG20
05/24/17 12:33 PM
Costs aside, do you like private school for kids ?
by Mr Nice
05/24/17 11:30 AM
2012 Subaru Impreza CVT hatch 100k mile review
by deanm11
05/24/17 11:15 AM
2002 Ford Crown Victoria 200k, 5.2 on Maxlife 5W20
by Colt45ws
05/24/17 11:05 AM
This is why I don't let anybody else change my oil
by Mossyoakglock
05/24/17 10:56 AM
Tuner for Chevrolet Tahoe?
by pacem
05/24/17 10:31 AM
Saw MotorKote @ Wally for $27.00
by Speak2Mountain
05/24/17 10:00 AM
Perfect SAT
by Virtus_Probi
05/24/17 09:41 AM
When's the last time you seen one of these on the
by 5AcresAndAFool
05/24/17 09:36 AM
My Wal-Mart has stopped carrying Maxlife atf
by NavyVet88
05/24/17 09:23 AM
Lexus Toyota V6's - Fitment for 2GR-FSE vs. 2GR-FE
by BeerLube
05/24/17 09:16 AM
Denso 90915-YZZF1 Oil filter cut open 5k interval.
by 5AcresAndAFool
05/24/17 08:18 AM
Beware of your surroundings
by CourierDriver
05/24/17 08:03 AM
Online viscosity calculators
by paulri
05/24/17 07:59 AM
Recalls: Audi, Chevy, Honda, Jeep, VW, MB, Toyota
by wemay
05/24/17 07:37 AM
Can't Email or Mail Banks?
by Ducked
05/24/17 06:15 AM
STP basic blue
by Camprunner
05/24/17 06:07 AM
2017 Silverado 5.3 filter ?
by dabo72
05/24/17 06:03 AM
Newest Members
Regina, stuka, rodekyll, nocarb, sebin
61653 Registered Users
Who's Online
96 registered (andyd, 1JZ_E46, CharlieJ, Astro14, 28oz, bunnspecial, 11 invisible), 2545 Guests and 10 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
61653 Members
66 Forums
265555 Topics
4388263 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3396636 - 06/13/14 02:10 PM basic home test of Star Tron....
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5067
Loc: KC
http://www.thehulltruth.com/boating-forum/430716-ethanol-sludge-unscientific-startron-test.html

Since people seem to be into testing from users lately, maybe some would be interested in this one.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Formula Shell 5W30, Fram TG, 150k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 55k+, Mag1 0W20, Fram OF

Top
#3396650 - 06/13/14 02:25 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 4781
Loc: USA
Something is wrong,cant get into that page.Must be sludged up...

Top
#3396673 - 06/13/14 02:45 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Donald Online   content


Registered: 03/21/04
Posts: 18500
Loc: Upstate NY
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.
_________________________
2015 Subaru Forester 2.5 engine/CVT
2015 Ford F250 w/Powerstroke
2016 Subaru Crosstrek CVT (wife's)


Top
#3396675 - 06/13/14 02:47 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: Donald]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5067
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.


It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Formula Shell 5W30, Fram TG, 150k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 55k+, Mag1 0W20, Fram OF

Top
#3396785 - 06/13/14 04:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3396891 - 06/13/14 07:06 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: dave5358]
GatorJ Offline


Registered: 07/24/03
Posts: 180
Loc: Tampa
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.


Or obtuse.

Top
#3397262 - 06/14/14 08:38 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
05LGTLtd Offline


Registered: 03/04/13
Posts: 1019
Loc: Va
The first thing I would question is why would you test an additive at full strength, especially on that claims to be an 'enzyme' additive. It's designed to work diluted with gasoline, why not do the bench test with a mix?

I use StarTron in an older vehicle and my OPE regularly. I don't expect miracles, but so far no problems with it for me. I started a thread a while back asking if any of the chemists here on the board could give some insight on the enzyme additive and never heard much...

Top
#3397267 - 06/14/14 08:48 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 15894
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
The marinas i do work for claim it hasn't helped with their ethanol issues.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3398410 - 06/15/14 07:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

Top
#3398440 - 06/15/14 08:04 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: morris]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: morris
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

As opposed to an unreal test? Double blind testing is frequently done with test medications: both the patient and the person administering the drug don't know if the pill is the real drug or a placebo. Hence, 'double blind'.

If you were testing an engine or an additive or some mechanical device, you might be better off keeping both eyes open. The only possible need for a double blind test would be a situation in which the test operator could materially influence the results, or if you planned to simply asked the operator for his opinion ("yeah, it ran great!"). If you can measure the results more objectively (more mpg per the ECU, greater cylinder pressure per the pressure gauge, less fuel used based on pump records) there is little need for a double blind test.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top