Recent Topics
Can we now agree that Fram is the best?
by cheesepuffs
09/29/16 09:40 PM
Damaged Filters?
by dx92beater
09/29/16 09:37 PM
Math pros, please help me measure my consumption.
by dx92beater
09/29/16 09:22 PM
Advance Auto Parts 'Experts' Rant
by krismoriah72
09/29/16 08:52 PM
Walmart Canada QSGB $2.77 a quart
by Run
09/29/16 08:14 PM
Swepco MolyXP 75w90 Synthetic Gear Lube
by Hullthumper
09/29/16 08:09 PM
Brake Drums Warped Out of Box..Part 2
by CapitalTruck
09/29/16 07:52 PM
PF 63E, 2015 Chevy Silverado, 6,xxx miles CUT OPEN
by car51
09/29/16 07:22 PM
FRAM EXTRA GUARD 6607, 5,000 miles CUT OPEN
by car51
09/29/16 07:10 PM
governor stuck on carburetor?
by motor_oil_madman
09/29/16 06:14 PM
BMW 3 series reliability?
by ford46guy
09/29/16 06:04 PM
debris in drained oil, how bad is this? (pics)
by John_Dude
09/29/16 05:58 PM
Newest Members
Wally3626, lancelot50, arthur88boston, cbuck, lwralaVTC92
59218 Registered Users
Who's Online
50 registered (901Memphis, asand1, 4WD, Atesz792, 2010Civic, andrewp1998, 2 invisible), 1309 Guests and 12 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59218 Members
66 Forums
255078 Topics
4190395 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3379666 - 05/23/14 11:01 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: morris]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 7355
Loc: beaver land EH?
Originally Posted By: morris
WHY? cause car makers make cars ONLY good enough.


popcorn2 popcorn2 popcorn2
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3379716 - 05/24/14 12:00 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
dailydriver Offline


Registered: 03/14/06
Posts: 8752
Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
If one is talking about full length, tuned, scavenging LONG TUBE headers, then the OEMs will NEVER use them now, since they do NOT allow the catcon(s) to be placed close enough to the exhaust ports in order to 'light off' properly, and STAY hot enough to function once the engine is running for a while.
They would never pass a 49 state sniffer test, let alone the crazy C.A.R.B standards.

If one is talking about factory/OEM length 'shorties', yes, they do allow the catcons to be placed close enough for light off and proper function (despite their worse heat retention than cast iron manifolds), BUT the OEMS would be VERY hesitant to use them due to; cost of 304/321/inconel stainless tubing material, the brittleness of this material, the aforementioned higher under hood noise issues, and the potential warping of the thinner mounting flanges and all of the exhaust/vacuum leak emissions/ECM problems that come with those leaks. frown
_________________________
2000 Z28 1SC 6 speed 180K miles
4L Motul 300V 0W-40, 2L Motul 300V 0W-20
M1-206 oil filter
Motul Gear 300 75W-90
Red Line D4/MTL in the T56

Top
#3379720 - 05/24/14 12:07 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 32285
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Stock M5 exhaust (foreground):



You'll note the cats are a fair ways back from the headers, which I would categorize as "mid length", as they aren't shorties and they aren't long-tubes either.
_________________________
02 Expedition
06 Charger R/T
14 Charger SRT-8

Top
#3379773 - 05/24/14 05:29 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 17764
Loc: Sunny Florida
Every SRT8 you see has a nifty pair of factory shorties wrapped in a sheet metal shroud. Flow well all the way to 600 crank hp or so. Quiet as a mouse!

Since many new engine designs have no exhaust manifold at all these days expect fewer headers!
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3379794 - 05/24/14 06:43 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
edwardh1 Offline


Registered: 01/17/03
Posts: 2326
Loc: Coastal South Carolina
noise and rust
_________________________
I know women who are always late, they do not allow travel time, they think like Star trek, you leave one place and materialize somewhere else.

Top
#3379836 - 05/24/14 08:02 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: OVERKILL]
fdcg27 Offline


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 12405
Loc: OH
Apparently, some low-po cars also come with headers from the factory.
My 318i has headers, although I guess it's fairly hi-po for its displacement, and it does make a lovely snarl when wound through the gears.
The rest of what was said above explains why most engines come with cast iron exhaust manifolds.
_________________________
12 Accord LX 53K HGMO 0W-20
09 Forester 67K PU 5W-30
02 Accord 144K GOil 5W-30
01 Focus ZX3 112K M1 5W-20
95 BMW 318iC 159K Delvac 15W-40

Top
#3379839 - 05/24/14 08:05 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
Miller88 Offline


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 11327
Loc: Onondaga County
Mazda skyactiv has 4-2-1 headers and play with valve timing to get the converter to light off.
_________________________
A Lada with manually adjusted drum brakes sounds like a fantastic car.
2000 Cherokee / 2011 Focus

Top
#3379910 - 05/24/14 10:25 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
GMBoy Online   content


Registered: 11/22/04
Posts: 7087
Loc: Texas
A lot of the reasons OEM's do not use headers is due to noise. Traditional exhaust manifolds are quieter and cheaper to make. Also a lot of late model manifolds look almost like headers anyhow. I just looked under the hood of a new 2015 Tahoe as it went down the line.


Edited by GMBoy (05/24/14 10:27 AM)

Top
#3380070 - 05/24/14 02:11 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
supton Offline


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 9108
Loc: NH
How many cars "need" headers? A few hp gain at an rpm that few use.
_________________________
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 6spd manual, 121k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra double cab, 4.6L, auto, 132k, his

Top
#3380211 - 05/24/14 06:19 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: supton]
fdcg27 Offline


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 12405
Loc: OH
Originally Posted By: supton
How many cars "need" headers? A few hp gain at an rpm that few use.


How many cars "need" more than four cylinders and two liters of displacement?
It isn't always or even usually about need, it's about want.
_________________________
12 Accord LX 53K HGMO 0W-20
09 Forester 67K PU 5W-30
02 Accord 144K GOil 5W-30
01 Focus ZX3 112K M1 5W-20
95 BMW 318iC 159K Delvac 15W-40

Top
#3380247 - 05/24/14 07:25 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: circuitsmith]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 14361
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
Originally Posted By: circuitsmith

Modern cast manifolds are far better than the "log" manifolds of yesteryear.

True but the old SBC iron Ram Horns are hard to beat and perform as well as or better than many tube headers.
Header performance without the drawbacks.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3380470 - 05/25/14 12:33 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
TiredTrucker Offline


Registered: 01/04/08
Posts: 2556
Loc: Central Iowa
The primary reason OEM's don't do stuff like this, except in their high end offerings, is production cost, pure and simple. OEM's, like most any business right down to a mom and pop hotdog stand, will try to trim every dollar from production cost they can. To that end, they will only use what they need to get the results they need. Even a $1 part, if it is not necessary, will be trimmed off of production. When you factor the number of vehicles produced, that $1 saving runs into the millions of dollars. Sure, this is all about profits, but they have to compete in the marketplace with everyone else making vehicles. And the majority of potential customers don't think in terms of headers, superchargers, etc. They want a vehicle that does what they want, and the cheapest price they can get it for.

Hey! That is exactly what the OEM's are doing themselves!
_________________________
The measure of integrity: Being able to see and admit the faults of your candidate as easily as those in the opposing candidate.

Top
#3380689 - 05/25/14 10:00 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
Bamaro Offline


Registered: 08/03/03
Posts: 1341
Loc: Balto.
Its a cost - benefit issue. (Cost includes durability)
_________________________
2015 Elantra
2009 Cobalt totaled by inattentive driver
1970 Camaro
2016 Civic
2015 Rogue
2014 Mazda3

Top
#3381064 - 05/25/14 07:37 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: OVERKILL]
dailydriver Offline


Registered: 03/14/06
Posts: 8752
Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Stock M5 exhaust (foreground):



You'll note the cats are a fair ways back from the headers, which I would categorize as "mid length", as they aren't shorties and they aren't long-tubes either.


Does Bimmer play with the timing/firing order/etc. in order to get the catcons to light off, like Mazda does with the high compression skyactivs??

Yes, those are about mid lengths, but it perplexes me that they did not put the catcon right at the flange of the header (already quite far away from the exhaust port) for faster/more efficient light off, and instead put it way back in the connecting/intermediate pipe. ???

I am guessing that unibody/subframe clearance and interference problems are the reason?
_________________________
2000 Z28 1SC 6 speed 180K miles
4L Motul 300V 0W-40, 2L Motul 300V 0W-20
M1-206 oil filter
Motul Gear 300 75W-90
Red Line D4/MTL in the T56

Top
#3381115 - 05/25/14 08:27 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: dailydriver]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 32285
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: dailydriver
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Stock M5 exhaust (foreground):



You'll note the cats are a fair ways back from the headers, which I would categorize as "mid length", as they aren't shorties and they aren't long-tubes either.


Does Bimmer play with the timing/firing order/etc. in order to get the catcons to light off, like Mazda does with the high compression skyactivs??

Yes, those are about mid lengths, but it perplexes me that they did not put the catcon right at the flange of the header (already quite far away from the exhaust port) for faster/more efficient light off, and instead put it way back in the connecting/intermediate pipe. ???

I am guessing that unibody/subframe clearance and interference problems are the reason?


Subframe and transmission.

The engine has a big electric air pump that runs for a bit on cold start, I assume to aide in lighting off the cats.
_________________________
02 Expedition
06 Charger R/T
14 Charger SRT-8

Top
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >