Recent Topics
Twin Turbo 4cyl Engine for 2019 Silverado 1500?
by SubLGT
52 minutes 41 seconds ago
Bob Lutz Strikes Again and Again
by Y_K
Today at 10:23 AM
API Base Oil Groups 1 - V.
by DWC28
Today at 09:36 AM
Honda Element 555,555 miles!
by fenixguy
Today at 09:14 AM
How to brine my turkey before smoking it?
by Ed_Flecko
Today at 09:11 AM
The heaviest and lightiest oil u have used?
by ZZman
Today at 08:03 AM
Why are old tools better?
by motor_oil_madman
Today at 07:41 AM
Mobil Delvac 5w40 - 10 Yr Engine Tear Down
by StevieC
Today at 06:35 AM
delo sae 30 & 40 CF/SL
by jakewells
Today at 06:22 AM
New generations of oils begin to take hold
by wemay
Today at 05:56 AM
I'm Reloading Less Than I Had Planned
by billt460
Today at 05:45 AM
White Marking Pen
by artbuc
Today at 04:03 AM
Thoughts on portable air tank 5 gallon for tires
by 901Memphis
Today at 03:16 AM
NEW AMAZON HD 10 FIRE TABLET BLACK FRIDAY SALE
by bmwjohn
Today at 12:57 AM
First oil change on '16 Camry.
by andyd
Yesterday at 11:42 PM
It's that time of year...
by gregk24
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Cut open: Mobil 1 M212-A used 14,237 miles
by gonefishing
Yesterday at 09:59 PM
greasing leaf springs to prevent rust?
by motor_oil_madman
Yesterday at 09:17 PM
Red Line 15W50, 6k mi OCI, 75k mi, Cadillac CTS-V
by Emperors6
Yesterday at 09:06 PM
Discount Tire Direct started Thanksgiving sales.
by dan_erickson
Yesterday at 09:00 PM
Newest Members
WmJ, MJ90, Davej98092, pabloabarth, shore48
63462 Registered Users
Who's Online
70 registered (alarmguy, 74DartSport, 2012AccentSE, alphadog, Alfred_B, 28oz, 6 invisible), 2004 Guests and 13 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
63462 Members
66 Forums
274114 Topics
4556013 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3379666 - 05/23/14 11:01 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: morris]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 7370
Loc: beaver land EH?
Originally Posted By: morris
WHY? cause car makers make cars ONLY good enough.


popcorn2 popcorn2 popcorn2
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3379716 - 05/24/14 12:00 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
dailydriver Offline


Registered: 03/14/06
Posts: 8752
Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
If one is talking about full length, tuned, scavenging LONG TUBE headers, then the OEMs will NEVER use them now, since they do NOT allow the catcon(s) to be placed close enough to the exhaust ports in order to 'light off' properly, and STAY hot enough to function once the engine is running for a while.
They would never pass a 49 state sniffer test, let alone the crazy C.A.R.B standards.

If one is talking about factory/OEM length 'shorties', yes, they do allow the catcons to be placed close enough for light off and proper function (despite their worse heat retention than cast iron manifolds), BUT the OEMS would be VERY hesitant to use them due to; cost of 304/321/inconel stainless tubing material, the brittleness of this material, the aforementioned higher under hood noise issues, and the potential warping of the thinner mounting flanges and all of the exhaust/vacuum leak emissions/ECM problems that come with those leaks. frown
_________________________
2000 Z28 1SC 6 speed 180K miles
4L Motul 300V 0W-40, 2L Motul 300V 0W-20
M1-206 oil filter
Motul Gear 300 75W-90
Red Line D4/MTL in the T56

Top
#3379720 - 05/24/14 12:07 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 34514
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Stock M5 exhaust (foreground):



You'll note the cats are a fair ways back from the headers, which I would categorize as "mid length", as they aren't shorties and they aren't long-tubes either.
_________________________
2016 Durango Limited
2016 Grand Cherokee SRT

Top
#3379773 - 05/24/14 05:29 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 18596
Loc: Sunny Florida
Every SRT8 you see has a nifty pair of factory shorties wrapped in a sheet metal shroud. Flow well all the way to 600 crank hp or so. Quiet as a mouse!

Since many new engine designs have no exhaust manifold at all these days expect fewer headers!
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3379794 - 05/24/14 06:43 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
edwardh1 Offline


Registered: 01/17/03
Posts: 2708
Loc: Coastal South Carolina
noise and rust
_________________________
Prius?
In line water heater?
Solar?
All save energy, but may not save money (complicated, no DIY, parts hard to get, parts expensive). You decide.

Top
#3379836 - 05/24/14 08:02 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: OVERKILL]
fdcg27 Offline


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 14686
Loc: OH
Apparently, some low-po cars also come with headers from the factory.
My 318i has headers, although I guess it's fairly hi-po for its displacement, and it does make a lovely snarl when wound through the gears.
The rest of what was said above explains why most engines come with cast iron exhaust manifolds.
_________________________
17 Forester 6K M1 AFE 0W20
12 Accord LX 78K M1 AFE 0W-20
09 Forester 95K M1HM 10W-30
01 Focus ZX3 118K PP 5W-20
96 Accord LX 104K T5 10W-30
95 318i

Top
#3379839 - 05/24/14 08:05 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
Miller88 Offline


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 12336
Loc: Onondaga County
Mazda skyactiv has 4-2-1 headers and play with valve timing to get the converter to light off.
_________________________
18 Forester 2.5I Manual
00 Jeep Cherokee
01 Ford F-350 (long term rental)

Top
#3379910 - 05/24/14 10:25 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
GMBoy Offline


Registered: 11/22/04
Posts: 7547
Loc: Texas
A lot of the reasons OEM's do not use headers is due to noise. Traditional exhaust manifolds are quieter and cheaper to make. Also a lot of late model manifolds look almost like headers anyhow. I just looked under the hood of a new 2015 Tahoe as it went down the line.


Edited by GMBoy (05/24/14 10:27 AM)

Top
#3380070 - 05/24/14 02:11 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
supton Online   content


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 11044
Loc: NH
How many cars "need" headers? A few hp gain at an rpm that few use.
_________________________
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 149k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 139k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 167k, his

Top
#3380211 - 05/24/14 06:19 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: supton]
fdcg27 Offline


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 14686
Loc: OH
Originally Posted By: supton
How many cars "need" headers? A few hp gain at an rpm that few use.


How many cars "need" more than four cylinders and two liters of displacement?
It isn't always or even usually about need, it's about want.
_________________________
17 Forester 6K M1 AFE 0W20
12 Accord LX 78K M1 AFE 0W-20
09 Forester 95K M1HM 10W-30
01 Focus ZX3 118K PP 5W-20
96 Accord LX 104K T5 10W-30
95 318i

Top
#3380247 - 05/24/14 07:25 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: circuitsmith]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 16517
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
Originally Posted By: circuitsmith

Modern cast manifolds are far better than the "log" manifolds of yesteryear.

True but the old SBC iron Ram Horns are hard to beat and perform as well as or better than many tube headers.
Header performance without the drawbacks.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3380470 - 05/25/14 12:33 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
TiredTrucker Offline


Registered: 01/04/08
Posts: 3174
Loc: Central Iowa
The primary reason OEM's don't do stuff like this, except in their high end offerings, is production cost, pure and simple. OEM's, like most any business right down to a mom and pop hotdog stand, will try to trim every dollar from production cost they can. To that end, they will only use what they need to get the results they need. Even a $1 part, if it is not necessary, will be trimmed off of production. When you factor the number of vehicles produced, that $1 saving runs into the millions of dollars. Sure, this is all about profits, but they have to compete in the marketplace with everyone else making vehicles. And the majority of potential customers don't think in terms of headers, superchargers, etc. They want a vehicle that does what they want, and the cheapest price they can get it for.

Hey! That is exactly what the OEM's are doing themselves!
_________________________
Freedom is not about having the choice to do what you want, but the choice to do what you ought.

Top
#3380689 - 05/25/14 10:00 AM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
Bamaro Offline


Registered: 08/03/03
Posts: 1402
Loc: Balto.
Its a cost - benefit issue. (Cost includes durability)
_________________________
2015 Elantra
2009 Cobalt totaled by inattentive driver
1970 Camaro
2016 Civic
2015 Rogue
2014 Mazda3

Top
#3381064 - 05/25/14 07:37 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: OVERKILL]
dailydriver Offline


Registered: 03/14/06
Posts: 8752
Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Stock M5 exhaust (foreground):



You'll note the cats are a fair ways back from the headers, which I would categorize as "mid length", as they aren't shorties and they aren't long-tubes either.


Does Bimmer play with the timing/firing order/etc. in order to get the catcons to light off, like Mazda does with the high compression skyactivs??

Yes, those are about mid lengths, but it perplexes me that they did not put the catcon right at the flange of the header (already quite far away from the exhaust port) for faster/more efficient light off, and instead put it way back in the connecting/intermediate pipe. ???

I am guessing that unibody/subframe clearance and interference problems are the reason?
_________________________
2000 Z28 1SC 6 speed 180K miles
4L Motul 300V 0W-40, 2L Motul 300V 0W-20
M1-206 oil filter
Motul Gear 300 75W-90
Red Line D4/MTL in the T56

Top
#3381115 - 05/25/14 08:27 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: dailydriver]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 34514
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: dailydriver
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Stock M5 exhaust (foreground):



You'll note the cats are a fair ways back from the headers, which I would categorize as "mid length", as they aren't shorties and they aren't long-tubes either.


Does Bimmer play with the timing/firing order/etc. in order to get the catcons to light off, like Mazda does with the high compression skyactivs??

Yes, those are about mid lengths, but it perplexes me that they did not put the catcon right at the flange of the header (already quite far away from the exhaust port) for faster/more efficient light off, and instead put it way back in the connecting/intermediate pipe. ???

I am guessing that unibody/subframe clearance and interference problems are the reason?


Subframe and transmission.

The engine has a big electric air pump that runs for a bit on cold start, I assume to aide in lighting off the cats.
_________________________
2016 Durango Limited
2016 Grand Cherokee SRT

Top
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >