Recent Topics
Manual Transmissions and DI/GDI engine issues
by Speak2Mountain
10/21/17 10:22 AM
Why would a short OCI clean better?
by MoreCowbellAz
10/21/17 10:21 AM
Where are the awesome first time lease deals?
by ZZman
10/21/17 10:14 AM
2001 Dodge 2500, 388k miles, 36k OCI on RT6
by A_Harman
10/21/17 10:04 AM
Costco Michelin X-Tour tire review
by Cujet
10/21/17 09:56 AM
How is Bitog Pronouced?
by rollinpete
10/21/17 09:56 AM
Cracked Head *pics*
by tomcruise
10/21/17 09:21 AM
Schaeffer Application Question
by Gebo
10/21/17 09:10 AM
Cayenne drain plug obstruction
by pda1122
10/21/17 08:15 AM
Castrol Woobie
by 07Piloteer
10/21/17 07:30 AM
1987 Toyota 22R 148KMi Valve cover pics
by Jason_Michaels
10/21/17 07:17 AM
Parts store websites
by dlundblad
10/21/17 07:13 AM
LSP3 VS FLUID FILM
by wantboost
10/21/17 02:44 AM
Phone App for Monitoring WiFi OBDII Port Adaptor
by ZeeOSix
10/21/17 01:36 AM
Mercedes Electric AA Class
by StevieC
10/21/17 01:17 AM
Reliability Ratings Article
by StevieC
10/21/17 12:43 AM
14 F-150 Ecoboost -12k miles -MC blend or PZ Full?
by DirtyApe
10/20/17 11:24 PM
Sticking with one oil brand for life of vehicle?
by wemay
10/20/17 09:44 PM
How much will a v belt stretch?
by motor_oil_madman
10/20/17 08:47 PM
Aerospace Protectant
by StevieC
10/20/17 08:45 PM
Newest Members
bsmith6356, RaisinCane, thkilroy, perknz, JEByrd
63172 Registered Users
Who's Online
80 registered (alphadog, aquariuscsm, 2015_PSD, Anduril, barkingspider, b1amgm47, 4 invisible), 2225 Guests and 15 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
63172 Members
66 Forums
272551 Topics
4525103 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3282204 - 02/14/14 04:57 PM Impractical vehicles
otis24 Offline


Registered: 10/30/05
Posts: 1569
Loc: South Dakota
I used to always want to own a Jeep. I know a few people who own them as their primary vehicle. IMHO, they have to be the most impractical vehicle out there. If someone could afford to just own a "fun" vehicle, this might be it. But, a Jeep can not haul many people, let alone do so as comfortably as a sedan.

A Jeep can haul little, if any, cargo. Not near as much as a small 4x4 pickup. An extended cab or crew cab pickup can haul small amounts of cargo and passengers as well.

Perhaps for a single person with no family or kids, a Jeep may make sense. Guessing an AWD/4WD SUV would be better. But for the most part, a Jeep seems to have little "practical" usefulness. Maybe thats the point of a Jeep?
_________________________
1991 Chevrolet K1500 (4.3, 4x4, 86k miles)

2016 Dodge Grand Caravan
(3.6 V6) 46500 miles

Top
#3282209 - 02/14/14 05:03 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
Shannow Offline


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 36914
Loc: 'Stralia
Yeah, I was taken by the Wragnlers when they started selling them again downunder.

Until I drove one, and tried to work out what to do with prams, baby seats, etc. etc.

Top
#3282210 - 02/14/14 05:04 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
supton Offline


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 10997
Loc: NH
I thought it was for "go anywhere". Small wheelbase, narrow, 4WD. For that purpose it's pretty practical. It does manage asphalt, and it manages fire roads, and it manages where the road becomes more of a hint.
_________________________
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 144k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 138k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 162k, his

Top
#3282225 - 02/14/14 05:17 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
Shannow Offline


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 36914
Loc: 'Stralia
Yeah, but my BJ42 'Cruiser could carry more gear with the people to those places.

Top
#3282275 - 02/14/14 06:00 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 8440
Loc: Florida
Some people just have to have a car that looks a certain way.

Just look at how many people since 1998 have bought VW Beetles, even though those beetles have a small trunk and back seats that are awkward to access. You could buy a Jetta at a similar price and not have all that frustration.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3282285 - 02/14/14 06:12 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
datech Offline


Registered: 01/14/14
Posts: 689
Loc: us
The jeep was invented for a particular duty, carrying just a few people, not much cargo except their personal firearms, over rugged terrain, often off-road.

It's still good for that but it's not going to compete with a modern highway vehicle.

Top
#3282287 - 02/14/14 06:13 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
MinamiKotaro Offline


Registered: 08/01/12
Posts: 1301
Loc: TN
I wanted a Wrangler, too, until I test-drove one (circa 1998). Uncomfortable, rode poorly, handled poorly, slow, lousy mileage, low tow rating, no cargo room, no passenger room, and, as they come stock, useless for any real off-roading.

Frankly, I couldn't think of a single positive thing to say about it. Newer ones would have to be better. I hope.
_________________________
1967 VW Beetle: Delo 15w40/ST4386
2004 Saturn Ion: Magnatec 5w30/DW5436
2014 Polaris Ranger 570: Delo 5-40/Wix 51356

Top
#3282300 - 02/14/14 06:25 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
MCompact Offline


Registered: 07/21/02
Posts: 3605
Loc: KY
In 2002 I bought a 1999 Wrangler Sahara in order to nullify a potential line of attack from a political opponent. Before I bought it I fully intended to sell it after the election. As it turned out, my wife, son, and I all became quite fond of it and I ended up selling my 1993 Pathfinder SE instead. Over the subsequent 15 years I've added Bilstein HDs, Hella E-Code headlamps, OSRAM Night Breaker Plus bulbs, a Banks Torque Tube exhaust manifold, and MB Quart speakers. We all still love it and I often drive it on longer trips for both work and pleasure. That said, to each his own...
_________________________
Mine:
2014 M235i
1999 Wrangler Sahara
1995 318ti Club Sport

Wife's:
2016 i3 REX
2009 Cooper Clubman

Son's
2009 328i

Buy what makes you smile...

Top
#3282311 - 02/14/14 06:36 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
fdcg27 Offline


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 14495
Loc: OH
For the way most of us use cars, this Jeep would be as practical as anything else.
They are fun to drive and they do have a unique look.
If you want one, then why not?
If you don't you should maybe buy a Fit.
If you want the best of both worlds, then see your Subaru dealer.
My point is that there are a lot of choices out there.
Pick one that suits you and your use.
Many different choices for many different users for that daily commute.
_________________________
17 Forester FF
12 Accord LX 69K SS 0W-20
09 Forester 95K M1HM 10W-30
01 Focus ZX3 118K PP 5W-20
96 Accord LX 104K T5 10W-30
95 BMW 318i 163K D1300

Top
#3282330 - 02/14/14 06:58 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
jeepman3071 Offline


Registered: 04/15/10
Posts: 3475
Loc: Storrs, Connecticut
I chose a Cherokee over a Wrangler simply because I can haul more people and cargo. I can also tow more, and the purchase price was cheaper. I somehow get better mpg than a Wrangler as well, I think it is due to the even worse aerodynamics of the Wrangler.

That said, I know many people who have them and love them. If you've ever driven to the beach on a hot sunny day with no doors or top you will want one.

I know a guy who has one as a daily driver. He pulls a jet-ski trailer with it in the summer, and uses it to plow his driveway in the winter.

I wouldn't own one as a daily driver but I can see why people would. shrug
_________________________
2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4.0L (175k) - Pennzoil HM 10w30, Wix 51516, Magnefine trans filter

Top
#3282337 - 02/14/14 07:07 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: MCompact]
Ramblejam Offline


Registered: 11/05/13
Posts: 3151
Loc: Kentucky
Originally Posted By: MCompact
In 2002 I bought a 1999 Wrangler Sahara in order to nullify a potential line of attack from a political opponent.


You need to elaborate on this...

Top
#3282355 - 02/14/14 07:35 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: Ramblejam]
MCompact Offline


Registered: 07/21/02
Posts: 3605
Loc: KY
Originally Posted By: Ramblejam
Originally Posted By: MCompact
In 2002 I bought a 1999 Wrangler Sahara in order to nullify a potential line of attack from a political opponent.


You need to elaborate on this...


I anticipated that my opponent would bring up the fact that I didn't drive an American-made vehicle; the Wrangler stopped that tactic in its tracks.
_________________________
Mine:
2014 M235i
1999 Wrangler Sahara
1995 318ti Club Sport

Wife's:
2016 i3 REX
2009 Cooper Clubman

Son's
2009 328i

Buy what makes you smile...

Top
#3282381 - 02/14/14 08:23 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
Chris142 Online   content


Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 15673
Loc: apple valley, ca
I daily drove mine for 10 yrs. It gives me an excuse to not get parts,deliver parts with it or more than 1 customer lol
_________________________
02 Wrangler super-s 10w30
87 F250 proline 15w40
04 Tahoe super-s 5w30
Z400 Lucas 10w30
KLR250 Maxima 10w40
Can am maveric edge 5w40
57 case tractor 15w40

Top
#3282386 - 02/14/14 08:27 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
dlundblad Offline


Registered: 09/30/13
Posts: 8591
Loc: Midwest
Wranglers are not very practical at all.. about like an Audi TT, Mazda Miata, VW Bug or any small 2 door. You buy them because they are fun. Even with a new JK, our family of 4 is cramped in there like clowns. Heaven forbid you go to the store and buy things with the expectation of taking it all home.. Made the mistake of getting a shop vac 30 miles from home once.

Doorless/ topless is awesome though.
_________________________
03 Grand Cherokee 4.0 197k Edge 10w40 HM
02 Volvo S60 2.4T 168k M1 0w40
97 Chevy Blazer 4.3 134k Mobil Super Syn. 5w30


Top
#3282397 - 02/14/14 08:41 PM Re: Impractical vehicles [Re: otis24]
otis24 Offline


Registered: 10/30/05
Posts: 1569
Loc: South Dakota
Yep, a topless option is nice, not just in Jeeps either!
_________________________
1991 Chevrolet K1500 (4.3, 4x4, 86k miles)

2016 Dodge Grand Caravan
(3.6 V6) 46500 miles

Top
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >