Recent Topics
Happy 100th Birthday Kirk Douglas!
by 2015_PSD
12/09/16 06:54 AM
alternator wire kit
by bmwjohn
12/09/16 03:45 AM
2016 Utility Dive Awards
by Shannow
12/09/16 02:53 AM
First OCI after changing to Maxlife ?
by AlanColorado
12/09/16 01:47 AM
Castrol Edge 5W30 sale Repco Sat 10th Dec only
by KL31
12/09/16 01:36 AM
eBay 20% off on auto parts tools, oil and stuff
by tenderloin
12/09/16 12:05 AM
Delivery Going To Be Late
by DoubleWasp
12/08/16 09:32 PM
Locking, limited-slip, and positrac
by mjoekingz28
12/08/16 08:48 PM
Dupont Wiper Blades $1.88 HD
by Warstud
12/08/16 08:29 PM
RIP Greg Lake
by aquariuscsm
12/08/16 07:53 PM
Greg Lake has died.
by simple_gifts
12/08/16 07:47 PM
Truck stalls when turning the steering wheel...
by Run
12/08/16 07:34 PM
Newest Members
GodSilla, PajEvo, petter8, Panos, hermannea
59822 Registered Users
Who's Online
66 registered (AirgunSavant, ABomb369, 2015_PSD, Avelectro, aquariuscsm, 97f150, 6 invisible), 1256 Guests and 19 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59822 Members
66 Forums
258029 Topics
4245719 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 783
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 15w-40 Delvac 1300
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-40 Delo 400LE
'09 Honda Fit LX 5w-20 PP
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 264
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 17589
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
I don't mean to brag but I just finished a jig-saw puzzle in 1 day. The box said 2-4 years. smile


Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top