Recent Topics
M1 HM Canadian Tire, M1, PYB, Regane
by Garak
09/30/16 02:59 AM
Ceramic pads optimal in -20 fahrenheit winter?
by Bikeman
09/30/16 01:02 AM
Can we now agree that Fram is the best?
by cheesepuffs
09/29/16 09:40 PM
Damaged Filters?
by dx92beater
09/29/16 09:37 PM
Math pros, please help me measure my consumption.
by dx92beater
09/29/16 09:22 PM
Advance Auto Parts 'Experts' Rant
by krismoriah72
09/29/16 08:52 PM
Walmart Canada QSGB $2.77 a quart
by Run
09/29/16 08:14 PM
Swepco MolyXP 75w90 Synthetic Gear Lube
by Hullthumper
09/29/16 08:09 PM
Brake Drums Warped Out of Box..Part 2
by CapitalTruck
09/29/16 07:52 PM
PF 63E, 2015 Chevy Silverado, 6,xxx miles CUT OPEN
by car51
09/29/16 07:22 PM
FRAM EXTRA GUARD 6607, 5,000 miles CUT OPEN
by car51
09/29/16 07:10 PM
governor stuck on carburetor?
by motor_oil_madman
09/29/16 06:14 PM
Newest Members
Wally3626, lancelot50, arthur88boston, cbuck, lwralaVTC92
59218 Registered Users
Who's Online
18 registered (doolah02, Black_Thunder, earlyre, bvance554, AnthemBassMan, 1 invisible), 778 Guests and 17 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59218 Members
66 Forums
255080 Topics
4190451 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3254401 - 01/20/14 08:04 PM VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 32162
Loc: Great Lakes
Strictly from a long term reliability perspective, is one of these engines better than the other?
_________________________
'02 530i (Edge HM 10W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T (Edge 5W-40)

Top
#3254511 - 01/20/14 09:44 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13031
Loc: Chicago, IL
Are you referring to the 3.0TFSI? (supercharged 3.0L V6)

If so, it's pretty solid. It's Audi's workhorse motor that's been used in nearly every model in a variety of configurations for many many years. The very early years did have some minor issues with plastic impellers on the water pumps, but a revised part was released and cars were recalled. They don't suffer from carbon buildup problems like the older FSI motors, but Audi still extended some additional warranty coverage/preventative maintenance just in case.

And if you want more power, they can very easily crank out 400hp+ with a simple tune from Stasis, APR, GIAC, etc. 450-500 is reachable with the tune, exhaust, and some other bolt-on upgrades.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
#3254729 - 01/21/14 07:20 AM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: dparm]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 32162
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: dparm
If so, it's pretty solid.

Right, but would you say it's more solid than the currently offered 2.0T?

Not really looking into running aftermarket tune on either one.
_________________________
'02 530i (Edge HM 10W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T (Edge 5W-40)

Top
#3254929 - 01/21/14 10:33 AM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13031
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: dparm
If so, it's pretty solid.

Right, but would you say it's more solid than the currently offered 2.0T?

Not really looking into running aftermarket tune on either one.



I think both are very strong motors. There's a reason they put them in pretty much every model.

My gut tells me that the V6 is the more reliable one since it seems to be a bit less high-strung. I think it's way overbuilt from the factory which is why you can easily squeeze 500hp out of stock internals.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
#3254932 - 01/21/14 10:39 AM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: Quattro Pete]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 32162
Loc: Great Lakes
Thanks!

Wife is potentially looking at a Q5/SQ5.
_________________________
'02 530i (Edge HM 10W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T (Edge 5W-40)

Top
#3254962 - 01/21/14 11:11 AM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: Quattro Pete]
taurus_sable Offline


Registered: 02/04/10
Posts: 82
Loc: Northeast
the 3.0T is an awesome motor which has been on ward best 10 list for 5 consec years.

Top
#3255146 - 01/21/14 01:45 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: Quattro Pete]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 17764
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Thanks!

Wife is potentially looking at a Q5/SQ5.



oooh, a 'squive', very favorably reviewed in the new Car and Driver.
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3255159 - 01/21/14 01:58 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: SteveSRT8]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 32162
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
oooh, a 'squive', very favorably reviewed in the new Car and Driver.

Yeah, well, I've got somewhat mixed feelings about it. On one hand, the extra hp/torque as well as some of the features of SQ5 are nice, but on the other hand MPG takes a further dive (3.0T MPG isn't anything to write home about either), and it comes with either 20" or 21" rims instead of 18" on the Q5. I would want this vehicle to be able to take a pothole "like a man" and not have to deal with bent rims or suspension components. Besides, the wife would never take advantage of the extra power anyway.

Cute looks, navigation, and rearview camera - that's about all she cares for. smile
_________________________
'02 530i (Edge HM 10W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T (Edge 5W-40)

Top
#3255171 - 01/21/14 02:08 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: Quattro Pete]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 17764
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
oooh, a 'squive', very favorably reviewed in the new Car and Driver.

Yeah, well, I've got somewhat mixed feelings about it. On one hand, the extra hp/torque as well as some of the features of SQ5 are nice, but on the other hand MPG takes a further dive (3.0T MPG isn't anything to write home about either), and it comes with either 20" or 21" rims instead of 18" on the Q5. I would want this vehicle to be able to take a pothole "like a man" and not have to deal with bent rims or suspension components. Besides, the wife would never take advantage of the extra power anyway.

Cute looks, navigation, and rearview camera - that's about all she cares for. smile


NP, the regular model still has most of the baked in goodness that Audis offer anyway.

BTW, as long as the rims are factory equipment they are unlikely to cause problems. Just watch out for the curb! I have hit HUGE potholes with the factory 20's on my car and it didn't hurt a thing...


Edited by SteveSRT8 (01/21/14 02:08 PM)
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3255180 - 01/21/14 02:17 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: SteveSRT8]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 32162
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
BTW, as long as the rims are factory equipment they are unlikely to cause problems.

One of the OEM rims on her c300 is bent, and yeah, they're all scratched pretty badly. She seems to love the curbs. smile

_________________________
'02 530i (Edge HM 10W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T (Edge 5W-40)

Top
#3255191 - 01/21/14 02:23 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13031
Loc: Chicago, IL
Sadly the SQ5 TDI is not sold here:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2013-audi-sq5-tdi-first-drive-review



I just looked and for 2014 they're now selling the Q5 in the US with the 3.0TFSI (non-SQ5, so detuned) and the 3.0 TDI. Both have the 8-speed trans with a 0.667:1 8th gear. The TDI is rated at 31mpg highway, which is pretty impressive for a 4400lb SUV with all-wheel drive.

Anecdotally I can tell you that my S4 with the 7-speed S tronic was handily beating the claimed MPG numbers on the highway.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
#3255201 - 01/21/14 02:34 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: Quattro Pete]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 17764
Loc: Sunny Florida
^^^You can bet the ZF 8 speed will beat those EPA numbers as well!
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3255212 - 01/21/14 02:50 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: SteveSRT8]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13031
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
^^^You can bet the ZF 8 speed will beat those EPA numbers as well!


I'm just disappointed that the S tronic gearbox wasn't selected for the SQ5. The ZF is a fine gearbox but it still can't match the dual-clutch.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
#3255221 - 01/21/14 02:55 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: dparm]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 17764
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: dparm
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
^^^You can bet the ZF 8 speed will beat those EPA numbers as well!


I'm just disappointed that the S tronic gearbox wasn't selected for the SQ5. The ZF is a fine gearbox but it still can't match the dual-clutch.


Just depends what you are trying to 'match'.

BMW, Audi, Bentley, Jaguar, the list grows every year. I'd say the ZF slushbox must be pretty nifty (and versatile!) ...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3256278 - 01/22/14 01:11 PM Re: VAG 2.0T vs 3.0T reliability [Re: Quattro Pete]
Norm Olt Offline


Registered: 01/27/03
Posts: 1829
Loc: Pac NW
Non-withstanding your "handle", Q-Pete, with a BMW, a Mercedes and a Lexus (?) in the garage the prospect of an SQ5 can only mean you wish to establish a closer relationship with the local Audi Service Department...

Aren't those a little few and far between in Illinoistan? Outside of The Second City, that is?

Cheers!

p.s. That was an interesting take in Car & Driver. 0-60mph in plenty (?) of time to get you in trouble!
_________________________
14Outback 10K
01ValkyrieIS 6K
93ZX11D 30K
87F250 185K
88420SEL 178K
88420SEL 212K (parts)
91420SEL 235K
92SVX 182K
00Nighthawk250 1.5K
93SC400 105K
85F150 104K

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >