Recent Topics
High mileage oil???
by OneEyeJack
06/29/17 03:27 AM
Question on 30wt oils
by Ammofirst
06/29/17 02:16 AM
True economics of extended oil drains
by userfriendly
06/29/17 12:34 AM
China to mass-produce 400km/h fast train
by L_Sludger
06/29/17 12:06 AM
why is it so hard to find a good body shop?
by tomcat27
06/28/17 11:32 PM
first aid kit..what to put in?
by bmwjohn
06/28/17 11:20 PM
2016 Harley sportster 883 iron
by jkhawaii
06/28/17 11:20 PM
Performed the Citric Acid Flush With Great Results
by DoubleWasp
06/28/17 11:13 PM
Who wants to buy this house?
by Chris142
06/28/17 11:09 PM
Switch from Royal Purple 10-40 to?
by 555
06/28/17 10:26 PM
Boutique/Expensive Oils over standard brands?
by gryffinwings
06/28/17 10:00 PM
Beck/Arnley control arm is Kia/Hyundai OEM
by Klutch9
06/28/17 09:38 PM
MPG after switched to new Mobil1 FS 0w40
by Eugene_Von
06/28/17 09:36 PM
Valvoline Maxlife Full Synthetic 5w30
by bbhero
06/28/17 09:16 PM
Toyo Open Country
by Camprunner
06/28/17 09:15 PM
Red Line 10W-30, 1992 Acura NSX, 3 months
by robertcope
06/28/17 09:10 PM
trans lubrication on startup
by MrTruckDriver
06/28/17 09:08 PM
Gas Pressure washer
by ford46guy
06/28/17 09:07 PM
Valvoline HD CK-4, CJ-4/SN Ford Approved Spec
by fantastic
06/28/17 08:53 PM
Lucas Oil, is it any good?
by Bob570
06/28/17 08:38 PM
Newest Members
fantastic, ACuna545, koryg0327, Fred_L_Johnson, turk182
62006 Registered Users
Who's Online
21 registered (craigq, Claud, Falcon_LS, d00df00d, earlyre, Brad_C, 2 invisible), 1024 Guests and 10 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
62006 Members
66 Forums
267197 Topics
4419486 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 ... 12 13 >
Topic Options
#3244734 - 01/11/14 10:15 AM Cell phone/driving: an officer's view
dernp Offline


Registered: 10/18/12
Posts: 504
Loc: S/W Ontario, Estero, Fla.
I thought I would start a thread about an incident I encountered last week.

Background: I am currently a patrol officer with 30 yrs experience. Cell phone use while driving is illegal and this includes texting/talking or holding any wireless communication device while driving. Driving is included to be stopped at a red light. In order to lawfully use your device, you must pull off to the side of the road, put your car in Park.

I feel that cell phone use while driving is an epidemic and clearly constitutes distracted driving.

Incident: I am driving a marked police cruiser and observe a driver stopped at a red light clearly talking on the cell phone. I pull the driver over and charge the driver with appropriate offence. The driver began to tell me that it wasn't fair because the driver's child had called for a ride home from school. We talked for a bit about blue tooth and hands free. But the point that struck me was that the driver felt that they were entitled to speak on the phone due to the nature of the call.

I did not start this thread for Bitoger's to tell me I should have warned the driver. I would like to hear views from other drivers about why they text/talk while driving. Is the call or text that important?

Thanks for taking the time to read this thread and I look forward to your responses.
_________________________
2014 Honda Civic 1.8 28k TGMO 0w20
2013 Honda CR-V 2.4 AWD 48k TGMO 0w20
2012 Elantra 61k PPPP 5w20
2011 Tundra 5.7L 48K PP 5w20



Top
#3244741 - 01/11/14 10:21 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: dernp]
spasm3 Offline


Registered: 05/30/10
Posts: 7418
Loc: North Carolina
That's not an emergency. Unless the driver was on the way to the hospital or reporting an accident/medical emergency, ticket them.


Edited by spasm3 (01/11/14 10:21 AM)
_________________________
13 elantra 58k 5w30 ultra
03 chevy avalanche70k m1 0w30
02 saturnsc1 70k 5w30 synpwr
01 saturnsc1 185k rebuilt
93 ciera 81k 5w30 mc5k

Top
#3244744 - 01/11/14 10:22 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: dernp]
loyd Offline


Registered: 08/30/12
Posts: 144
Loc: California
Well, you got it half right. It has been proven tht talking on a hands-free device is ALSO distracted driving. Think about it, if you're trying to listen closely to what somedone is telling you AND trying to formulate your reply, how much of your attention is really on the road and what's happening around you ?????????????

Top
#3244749 - 01/11/14 10:25 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: dernp]
FowVay Offline


Registered: 06/02/02
Posts: 2541
Loc: Southeastern USA
As long as those in law enforcement continue to chat with their girlfriends/wives while operating their government provided motor vehicle I can only assume that it truly isnt' that grave of a danger.

I would absolutely love to see the phone records of the thousands of cops who chat for hours on end while on duty.

So to answer the question - my view is that you should conduct this survey in the locker room at your place of business.

Top
#3244763 - 01/11/14 10:35 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: dernp]
Rand Offline


Registered: 08/20/03
Posts: 11650
Loc: NE,Ohio
Its certainly true.
I was driving yesterday and a 13' box truck in front of me was doing 24 in a 35 and weaving...

the guy driving was talking on phone.
He never even turned off(wasnt looking for an address)

I have handsfree. When I answer the phone I tell them what do you want I'm driving make it fast. 10s later I'm off the phone.

unless I'm sitting at a light, or driving an empty highway at night. I will let the call go on longer maybe 1-2m
_________________________
2017 Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk V6

Top
#3244775 - 01/11/14 10:44 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: dernp]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13119
Loc: Chicago, IL
Glad to hear at least one officer thinks its serious. Illinois finally made it illegal to talk while driving but there is zero enforcement and it just comes off as an empty threat from our politicians.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP -- FOR SALE!!
2017 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport

Top
#3244788 - 01/11/14 10:54 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: FowVay]
JHZR2 Offline



Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 39891
Loc: New Jersey
Originally Posted By: FowVay
As long as those in law enforcement continue to chat with their girlfriends/wives while operating their government provided motor vehicle I can only assume that it truly isnt' that grave of a danger.

I would absolutely love to see the phone records of the thousands of cops who chat for hours on end while on duty.

So to answer the question - my view is that you should conduct this survey in the locker room at your place of business.



This is so true. There is a do as I say, not as I do in policing. Even officers using their POVs off duty (I know quite a few) who drive excessively, relying upon the fact that they'll get a professional courtesy if stopped.

So the point made is a good one, but the OP is trying to do his job and is enforcing the law correctly.

I don't have an issue with hands free, because it's not necessarily different than having a conversation with someone in the car. But operating the vehicle outside of the rules due to a faulty interpretation is fair game. There probably is some reasonable flexibility for the situation, but the laws are what they are.

Top
#3244789 - 01/11/14 10:54 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: FowVay]
hemitom Offline


Registered: 03/12/07
Posts: 844
Loc: canada
Originally Posted By: FowVay
As long as those in law enforcement continue to chat with their girlfriends/wives while operating their government provided motor vehicle I can only assume that it truly isnt' that grave of a danger.

I would absolutely love to see the phone records of the thousands of cops who chat for hours on end while on duty.

So to answer the question - my view is that you should conduct this survey in the locker room at your place of business.

Hitting The Nail On The Head....

I have seen our local police constantly using their cell phones while driving, i'm willing to bet none of it is duty related.
I do believe its a dangerous thing to do, and offenders should be fined for doing so.


Edited by hemitom (01/11/14 10:56 AM)
_________________________
2006 kia spectra
2009 hyundai santa fe
2012 mustang coupe.

Top
#3244791 - 01/11/14 10:56 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: dernp]
beanoil Offline


Registered: 10/17/04
Posts: 2552
Loc: Midwest, Illinois
I don't answer the phone, look at email or text while driving. It's against my state law, and a violation of my companies policies. Just too dangerous, and besides, with the electronic fingerprinting available, it's too easy to prove you were distracted. For example, nephew totals a Corvette. Black box on the Vette showed excess speed, and cell records showed he was on the phone. Insurance balked, the police had proof, and it was all over but the crying at that point.
_________________________
beanoil: Tough under heat, real dirty afterwards.

Top
#3244800 - 01/11/14 11:04 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: FowVay]
xxch4osxx Offline


Registered: 03/11/09
Posts: 2265
Loc: Cedarbrae, Ontario
Originally Posted By: FowVay
As long as those in law enforcement continue to chat with their girlfriends/wives while operating their government provided motor vehicle I can only assume that it truly isnt' that grave of a danger.

I would absolutely love to see the phone records of the thousands of cops who chat for hours on end while on duty.

So to answer the question - my view is that you should conduct this survey in the locker room at your place of business.
I agree 100% here. I live in the same province as the OP and see OPP and local police yapping on cell phones regularly while driving.
_________________________
2015 RAM SXT Crew Cab 5.7 with 6 speed tranny.

2008 Mazda 3 GS Sport Hatchback 5sp MT (Girlfriend's car)


Top
#3244806 - 01/11/14 11:05 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: FowVay]
eljefino Offline


Registered: 06/15/03
Posts: 31042
Loc: ME
Originally Posted By: FowVay
As long as those in law enforcement continue to chat with their girlfriends/wives while operating their government provided motor vehicle I can only assume that it truly isnt' that grave of a danger.


I suspect they talk to other officers about subjects they don't want recorded on a tape for future use as evidence like would happen if they used their official radio channels.

Top
#3244809 - 01/11/14 11:07 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: dernp]
eljefino Offline


Registered: 06/15/03
Posts: 31042
Loc: ME
Legitimate use of a cell phone is a 15-20 second call for the exchange of info. Eg where are you, get a gallon of milk on the way please.

But there should be a 25-50 cent a minute fee that goes into a kitty to cover underinsured motorist claims.

Watch a 5pm commute and everyone is on their phones complaining about their bosses or husbands or whatever... it's the only private time they get in their day. Thing is, face your problems, then you won't have to complain about them!

Top
#3244811 - 01/11/14 11:09 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: dernp]
old1 Offline


Registered: 01/04/11
Posts: 809
Loc: Columbus Nebraska
Personally I never use a cell phone while driving, as I think it is dangerous as all****. But the one thing I don't understand is why it would be unlawful to use a hands free device? I can't see any difference between that and talking to another person in the car. Maybe even less dangerous, as many people tend to look at the person they are talking to.
_________________________
2014 Fusion 2.5 engine 5/20 QSUD Napa gold
1965 Mustang 200 c/4 10w30 QS defy Fram TG
1964 Ford Ranchero 302 c/4 15/40 Delo Napa gold

Top
#3244816 - 01/11/14 11:11 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: loyd]
jeremiah2360 Offline


Registered: 10/06/03
Posts: 223
Loc: Massachusetts
Originally Posted By: loyd
Well, you got it half right. It has been proven tht talking on a hands-free device is ALSO distracted driving. Think about it, if you're trying to listen closely to what somedone is telling you AND trying to formulate your reply, how much of your attention is really on the road and what's happening around you ?????????????


So no talking to passengers. Gimme a break with that control freak logic.

Top
#3244818 - 01/11/14 11:14 AM Re: Cell phone/driving: an officer's view [Re: dernp]
Stelth Offline


Registered: 02/24/11
Posts: 1910
Loc: California
Originally Posted By: dernp
I thought I would start a thread about an incident I encountered last week.

Background: I am currently a patrol officer with 30 yrs experience. Cell phone use while driving is illegal and this includes texting/talking or holding any wireless communication device while driving. Driving is included to be stopped at a red light. In order to lawfully use your device, you must pull off to the side of the road, put your car in Park.

I feel that cell phone use while driving is an epidemic and clearly constitutes distracted driving.

Incident: I am driving a marked police cruiser and observe a driver stopped at a red light clearly talking on the cell phone. I pull the driver over and charge the driver with appropriate offence. The driver began to tell me that it wasn't fair because the driver's child had called for a ride home from school. We talked for a bit about blue tooth and hands free. But the point that struck me was that the driver felt that they were entitled to speak on the phone due to the nature of the call.

I did not start this thread for Bitoger's to tell me I should have warned the driver. I would like to hear views from other drivers about why they text/talk while driving. Is the call or text that important?

Thanks for taking the time to read this thread and I look forward to your responses.


I am so glad you brought this up. There is so much baloney going around about cell phones, distracted driving, blah, blah, blah. What a bunch of hooey.

Now, as a patrol officer, it's your job to enforce the law, so this is not a direct criticism of you. Someone breaks the law, you are supposed to intervene. Fine.

However, it's not possible to legislate or regulate all danger out of existence. There are poor drivers who can be distracted by almost anything, or who drive poorly whether distracted or not. As long as they are given licenses, they will cause accidents. Sure, I've missed an exit because I was talking on the phone. I've also missed exits because I was listening to something on the radio, or simply deep in thought. Am I a distracted driver? Sometimes, so's everybody.

If you want to get rid of distracted driving, sure, ban phones, ban radios, ban kids in the car (talk about a distraction!), ban coffee, sodas, food, cigarettes, any sort of cargo (groceries) that can shift, ban discussion with others in the car (I've heard this one proposed), and so on. I bet if you did all of those things, the accident rate wouldn't dip very much.

Distracted driving is already illegal, regardless of the cause. If you're swerving around the freeway, or otherwise driving erratically, you should expect to attract the attention of the local gendarmes. Somewhere, there should be a line between force and personal responsibility.

Having said all that, one doesn't get to choose which laws one obeys. That's why I already have a couple of bluetooth devices, and I'm still looking for one that really works in the environments where I need one.

And yes, I see cops all the time talking on cell phones while driving patrol cars.
_________________________
Experts are often wrong, but rarely in doubt.

Top
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 ... 12 13 >