Recent Topics
Fleet Farm Pennzoil Platinum QT's $1.99 Clearance!
by icefury
11 minutes 18 seconds ago
Touchless washes bad for paint?
by mjoekingz28
Today at 12:52 AM
Reason(s) for V8 not being smooth at idle
by yugrus
Yesterday at 11:54 PM
Buying based on service
by Ben Boyle
Yesterday at 10:30 PM
Yellow high beam bulbs legal?
by mclasser
Yesterday at 10:26 PM
Well I didn't expect that!
by Chris142
Yesterday at 10:19 PM
Advance Auto Parts, 0 for 4.
by JustinH
Yesterday at 09:26 PM
Sully
by turtlevette
Yesterday at 08:58 PM
Escape high rpm?
by Errtt
Yesterday at 08:12 PM
Stinky HEPA filter
by Quattro Pete
Yesterday at 08:04 PM
Texas Mile
by FranklinJL
Yesterday at 07:37 PM
GS300 2003 Motor Oil Recommendation
by lucas01230
Yesterday at 07:36 PM
Newest Members
Slash2CPU, Rforce, JDMiller, 9009000, tsl1968
59203 Registered Users
Who's Online
18 registered (Garak, dino33, bbhero, DemoFly, gallydif, Cristobal, 2 invisible), 610 Guests and 14 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59203 Members
66 Forums
255001 Topics
4188828 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3128297 - 09/18/13 06:51 AM GF-6 delayed again
jake88 Offline


Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 146
Loc: MO
http://www.imakenews.com/lng/e_article002788089.cfm?x=bmM3gHT,bpcHqJDR

Getting a robust new engine oil category, but it is taking a lot longer than expected...

Thoughts?
_________________________

'13 Mazda 3 Touring 5DR, 2.0L
'12 Ford Fiesta SE 4DR, 1.6L

Top
#3128338 - 09/18/13 07:37 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
A_Harman Offline


Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 6066
Loc: Michigan
I didn't realize how many new tests were being developed for GF-6. And with new tests being developed for PC-11, no wonder things are stretching out. I wonder if this will affect introduction of the 16-weight?
_________________________
1985 Z51 Corvette track car
2002 Camaro Z28 LS1/6-speed
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 diesel
1972 GMC 1500 shortbed project truck

Top
#3128479 - 09/18/13 10:27 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: A_Harman]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13031
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: A_Harman
I didn't realize how many new tests were being developed for GF-6. And with new tests being developed for PC-11, no wonder things are stretching out. I wonder if this will affect introduction of the 16-weight?



Unsure. The weighting is an SAE thing so there's technically nothing stopping them from offering it. We already have a few 0w15s.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
#3129280 - 09/19/13 07:05 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: dparm]
jake88 Offline


Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 146
Loc: MO
SAE already approved the 0W-16, but I am not sure that many marketers/OEMs are going to be jumping out there with SAE 0W-16 grades until there is a lot of data on the new engine test stands. The rumor I have heard from industry folks is that the 0W-16 is being met with a lot of skepticism from all but one or two OEMs
_________________________

'13 Mazda 3 Touring 5DR, 2.0L
'12 Ford Fiesta SE 4DR, 1.6L

Top
#3131477 - 09/21/13 10:19 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
RF Overlord Offline


Registered: 11/08/03
Posts: 3605
Loc: Cape Cod, MA
We are all "just" getting used to 0W-20...introducing 0W-16 so soon may be premature.

Related question: Since we all accept that these new "thinner' oils were introduced for fuel economy, how much improvement can be squeezed from using ever-thinner oils?

Please note: I am not claiming 5W-20 et. al. have no value other than fuel economy. I accept that it's been proven they are good oils, I just don't know how much more improvement there is to be had from 0W-16? Are we destined to spend $500 more per engine in redesign costs to save 0.01% in fuel costs?
_________________________
Supercharged '03 Mercury Marauder - Trilogy Motorsports #61
PP 5W-30 / MC FL820S

Y2K Grand Marquis GS - daily driver
QSUD 5W-20 / MC FL820S

Top
#3132142 - 09/22/13 07:35 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: RF Overlord]
David1 Offline


Registered: 06/17/13
Posts: 1209
Loc: USA, FLA
Originally Posted By: RF Overlord
We are all "just" getting used to 0W-20...introducing 0W-16 so soon may be premature.

Related question: Since we all accept that these new "thinner' oils were introduced for fuel economy, how much improvement can be squeezed from using ever-thinner oils?

Please note: I am not claiming 5W-20 et. al. have no value other than fuel economy. I accept that it's been proven they are good oils, I just don't know how much more improvement there is to be had from 0W-16? Are we destined to spend $500 more per engine in redesign costs to save 0.01% in fuel costs?



what about 0 w 5

or 0 w 0

is that even possible?

0 w 0

?????????????
_________________________
2002 Honda Accord V6 3.0 Automatic Trans 203000 Miles
Valvoline Maxx Life 5W30
Purolator BOSS Or HONDA Filtech A01s

Top
#3133008 - 09/23/13 12:15 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
901Memphis Offline


Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 11063
Loc: Northern Kentucky
There was a neo 0w5 and maybe more out there for racing.
_________________________
2002 Buick Century 125k - Built 4T65e(Maxlife) - Syn Frankenbrew + XG 3387A
1998 Nissan Altima 335k - 5MT - M1 HM 5w30/Fram Ultra XG7317+MOS+ATP 205

Top
#3133010 - 09/23/13 12:19 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
901Memphis Offline


Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 11063
Loc: Northern Kentucky
http://paceperformance.com/i-6303128-rpm04205-royal-rurple-xpr-3-1-0w5-synthetic-racing-motor-oil-1-gallon-bottle.htmlttp://www.bakerprecision.com/neo/0w5.htm

http://www.redlineoil.com/product.aspx?pid=11&pcid=1


http://m.summitracing.com/search/brand/l.../oil-weight/0w5



.
_________________________
2002 Buick Century 125k - Built 4T65e(Maxlife) - Syn Frankenbrew + XG 3387A
1998 Nissan Altima 335k - 5MT - M1 HM 5w30/Fram Ultra XG7317+MOS+ATP 205

Top
#3133349 - 09/23/13 11:16 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: David1]
NateDN10 Offline


Registered: 01/10/10
Posts: 1638
Loc: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted By: David1



what about 0 w 5

or 0 w 0

is that even possible?

0 w 0

?????????????

The "weights" are standards classified by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). SAE 16 is the thinnest and most recent standard. There are no official SAE standards below this. So it's certainly possible to make a thinner oil, it wouldn't have an official SAE number.
_________________________
2016 Mazda3 - 1000 mi.
2012 Mazda5 - 90,000 mi.

Top
#3133545 - 09/23/13 02:53 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: NateDN10]
jake88 Offline


Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 146
Loc: MO
Originally Posted By: NateDN10
Originally Posted By: David1



what about 0 w 5

or 0 w 0

is that even possible?

0 w 0

?????????????

The "weights" are standards classified by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). SAE 16 is the thinnest and most recent standard. There are no official SAE standards below this. So it's certainly possible to make a thinner oil, it wouldn't have an official SAE number.


Indeed, anything lighter than an SAE 16 is not really classified as a multi-grade oil. For instance an oil with a [email protected] of 4.5 would just be labeled as whatever winter-grade number the cold-flow properties dictate (e.g. SAE 0W)
_________________________

'13 Mazda 3 Touring 5DR, 2.0L
'12 Ford Fiesta SE 4DR, 1.6L

Top
#3134366 - 09/24/13 11:31 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
vinu_neuro Offline


Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 1057
Loc: Chicago / IN
SAE papers published by big name formulators last year showed very serious durability issues with 16wt, 5-6 times the wear in IVA compared to 20wt.
_________________________
04 Honda Accord Coupe V6 6MT | M1 EP 0W-20

Top
#3134518 - 09/24/13 12:51 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: vinu_neuro]
jake88 Offline


Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 146
Loc: MO
I am in total agreement on the accelerated wear issue. What good is an increase of <1mpg if it significantly shortens the life of the engine?... then again, if I was in the business of selling new engines I may sing a different tune.
_________________________

'13 Mazda 3 Touring 5DR, 2.0L
'12 Ford Fiesta SE 4DR, 1.6L

Top
#3134828 - 09/24/13 04:50 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
bluesubie Offline


Registered: 08/04/03
Posts: 2089
Loc: NJ
Originally Posted By: jake88
I am in total agreement on the accelerated wear issue. What good is an increase of <1mpg if it significantly shortens the life of the engine?... then again, if I was in the business of selling new engines I may sing a different tune.

That <1 mpg for an entire fleet really adds up when it comes to CAFE fines and credits. It's probably cheaper to just replace a few dozen engines than to risk losing credits or paying fines.

Subaru is having consumption issues with the new Forester and Impreza engines that spec 0W-20. I've been reading about engine replacements, re-ring jobs on 2014's, lemon law buy-backs, etc. I guess Subaru/Fuji Heavy still has some work to do on building engines that run on thin oils (although the Euro sub 2.0 engines have specced 0W-20 for years).

I hope GF-6 is delayed or revised to remove 0W-16.

-Dennis


Edited by bluesubie (09/24/13 04:51 PM)
_________________________
'04 Subaru Forester 2.5XT
Mobil 1 0W-40

Top
#3134838 - 09/24/13 04:58 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
vinu_neuro Offline


Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 1057
Loc: Chicago / IN
Honda is biggest proponent I think. Even if it comes through doesn't mean the other OEM's will adopt it.
_________________________
04 Honda Accord Coupe V6 6MT | M1 EP 0W-20

Top
#3135607 - 09/25/13 12:08 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
bluesubie Offline


Registered: 08/04/03
Posts: 2089
Loc: NJ
I guess SoA saw my rant above.

http://techinfo.subaru.com/static/whatsNew.html

02-145-13 Technical Service Bulletin Surface Treatment Change To Oil Control Piston Rings (2012-2013MY Impreza and 2013MY XV Crosstrek) Sep 25, 2013 [View PDF]

02-144-13 Technical Service Bulletin Surface Treatment Change To Oil Control Piston Rings (2012-2014MY Forester) Sep 25, 2013 [View PDF]

Bring on the 0W-16? laugh

-Dennis
_________________________
'04 Subaru Forester 2.5XT
Mobil 1 0W-40

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >