Greetings. I've spent dozens of hours here and all over the internet looking at experiences and opinions regarding synthetic vs. conventional. There are clearly two types of people: knowledgeable ones who have gone synthetic, and those who don't seem open minded about it. Therefore, I am going to try group 1. I have a family fleet of Toyota 4 cylinder engines, and the reduced OCI of a good synthetic is the main feature I am interested in giving the number of vehicles I am managing. None of them consumes any oil at all (yes, I am THAT good ;]), and all are predominantly highway driven, few trips of less than 5 miles ever.
Because the 2008 RAV4 in my fleet is the only one for which Toyota overtly recommends synthetic (0W20), I am trying it first. My plan, as it stands, is to use Mobil 1 extended, with a K&N filter, and an analysis at 7500 miles followed by another at 10-12k miles if the first one indicates OK. Why K&N? Because I am worried that one year/15000 miles may result in a difficult removal.
In all my reading, I've never found anyone whose engine failed on synthetic, except for a handful of people who pushed it beyond 20k miles.
A successful transition to 15000 miles will result in applying the Mobil EP to the whole fleet.
I'm seeking comments from the knowledgable crowd.
TIA
Because the 2008 RAV4 in my fleet is the only one for which Toyota overtly recommends synthetic (0W20), I am trying it first. My plan, as it stands, is to use Mobil 1 extended, with a K&N filter, and an analysis at 7500 miles followed by another at 10-12k miles if the first one indicates OK. Why K&N? Because I am worried that one year/15000 miles may result in a difficult removal.
In all my reading, I've never found anyone whose engine failed on synthetic, except for a handful of people who pushed it beyond 20k miles.
A successful transition to 15000 miles will result in applying the Mobil EP to the whole fleet.
I'm seeking comments from the knowledgable crowd.
TIA