Recent Topics
RLI in Direct Injection Applications
by FlyPenFly
10/23/17 09:16 PM
budget car battery recommendation?
by Carbon12
10/23/17 09:13 PM
Halloween Funny
by StevieC
10/23/17 08:46 PM
Garage Door opener lighting?
by SuperDave456
10/23/17 08:31 PM
Ford Ranger Oil and Filter Recommendations
by CamBurt33
10/23/17 08:24 PM
17' Nissan Sentra Turbo-Has anyone here drove one?
by skyactiv
10/23/17 08:20 PM
Marine diesel 4,000 hour service interval
by DeepFriar
10/23/17 07:40 PM
Wagner OEX Brake Pad?
by demarpaint
10/23/17 06:32 PM
If you think...
by MolaKule
10/23/17 06:09 PM
Recommended vs Required oil for a 2012 Honda Pilot
by Keats
10/23/17 05:58 PM
E85 concentration level and pump signage
by 04SE
10/23/17 05:57 PM
Valv SynPower 5W/30, 3500mi, 106k mi, 06 Sentra
by silversapphire
10/23/17 05:53 PM
HVAC help
by Brybo86
10/23/17 05:42 PM
Who makes the Rural King “Harvest King” brand oil
by tech230
10/23/17 05:31 PM
Elf evolution nf900 - aircooled suitability
by Cornershop
10/23/17 05:15 PM
Cash for Clunkers - How they destroyed the engines
by StevieC
10/23/17 04:56 PM
Squirrel takes out Chippy
by chiefsfan1
10/23/17 04:13 PM
Update to newer ver. of Android
by SHOZ
10/23/17 04:06 PM
Mobil 1 0W-40, 5729mi, 96 Acura 3.5RL, 174,643mi
by DuckRyder
10/23/17 03:44 PM
Pat Goss Opine on Blowby on DI Engines
by Speak2Mountain
10/23/17 03:30 PM
Newest Members
Lee19890328, re5513, MAALI348, hellokitty, B3YOND
63191 Registered Users
Who's Online
102 registered (69GTX, Aichiguy, alarmguy, 2009Edge, Astro14, aquariuscsm, 13 invisible), 2097 Guests and 14 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
63191 Members
66 Forums
272675 Topics
4527532 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 ... 9 10 >
Topic Options
#2886161 - 01/27/13 07:28 PM Another Look at Ethanol
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 18321
Loc: Iowegia - USA
_________________________
Birthdays are good for your health. Studies have shown that the more birthdays you have, the longer you live. smile

Top
#2886164 - 01/27/13 07:32 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: MolaKule]
RiceCake Offline


Registered: 09/22/12
Posts: 1044
Loc: Coldtown, Canada
What I would like to see is hydrogen worked on, versus a fuel that essentially has no ability to develop anywhere beyond "grow more".

Top
#2886167 - 01/27/13 07:39 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: MolaKule]
jimbrewer Offline


Registered: 12/30/12
Posts: 1363
Loc: New Mexico, USA
Personally, I think its immoral to burn food in the gas tank of a car. There are some areas where its a legal requirement, because of the oxygenation feature.

I found the puregas.org site on the web and found out there's a no ethanol pump in my town. I'm not ashamed to say I try and finagle a a reason to be in that neighborhood so as to gas up there if I possibly can. Car has more zip and gets maybe 1 mpg better mileage with the no ethanol. Its also premium, but I don't know if that makes a difference.

Top
#2886174 - 01/27/13 07:43 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: jimbrewer]
Danno Online   content


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 1674
Loc: Northern Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: jimbrewer
Its also premium, but I don't know if that makes a difference.

What are you driving?

Top
#2886177 - 01/27/13 07:45 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: RiceCake]
Danno Online   content


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 1674
Loc: Northern Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: RiceCake
What I would like to see is hydrogen worked on, versus a fuel that essentially has no ability to develop anywhere beyond "grow more".


The achilles heel for hydrogen is the amount of energy needed to convert water to hydrogen. When the input power exceeds the output, it is always a losing proposition.

Top
#2886201 - 01/27/13 08:15 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: jimbrewer]
Donald Online   content


Registered: 03/21/04
Posts: 19353
Loc: Upstate NY
Originally Posted By: jimbrewer
Personally, I think its immoral to burn food in the gas tank of a car. There are some areas where its a legal requirement, because of the oxygenation feature.

I found the puregas.org site on the web and found out there's a no ethanol pump in my town. I'm not ashamed to say I try and finagle a a reason to be in that neighborhood so as to gas up there if I possibly can. Car has more zip and gets maybe 1 mpg better mileage with the no ethanol. Its also premium, but I don't know if that makes a difference.


There is a whole list of chemicals that can be used as oxygenators.
_________________________
2015 Subaru Forester 2.5 engine/CVT
2015 Ford F250 w/Powerstroke
2016 Subaru Crosstrek CVT (wife's)


Top
#2886203 - 01/27/13 08:16 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: Danno]
Nyquist Offline


Registered: 10/24/08
Posts: 928
Loc: Iowa
I agree that corn-based ethanol is probably an idea that does more harm that good, but I think it is temporary now. In the future I see companies developing a more efficient means of producing ethanol using various types of algaes.
_________________________
2015 Chevy Traverse 3.6L (LLT) Mobil 1 5w30 w/ Fram Ultra
2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L (L61) Mobil 1 0w30 w/ ACDelco

Top
#2886212 - 01/27/13 08:24 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: MolaKule]
Panzerman Online   happy


Registered: 12/16/06
Posts: 3910
Loc: Port Orange, Florida
Its a perfect example of un-informed enviromentalist causing exactly the opposite of their intentions. Your car uses more gas, you use more water to make ethanol and it does more harm then good. Plus, the cost. The only place you can find non-ethanol in Florida is at Marinas and you pay out the Ying yang, but its still better than the agrevation of dealing with it in smalll engines. Now I wish they would clear cut all the dead trees down here, instead of being a "Save Old Florida" kick. Old trees use more oxygen then they make, again un-informed and hard headed enviro-nuts.
_________________________
2007 Ford F-150 FX-2 85,000 (Daughter's Now)
2007 Ford F-150 FX-4 217,000 (Son's Now)
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4 84,000
2016 Dodge Challenger RT 4500

Top
#2886266 - 01/27/13 09:07 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: Danno]
RiceCake Offline


Registered: 09/22/12
Posts: 1044
Loc: Coldtown, Canada
Originally Posted By: Danno
Originally Posted By: RiceCake
What I would like to see is hydrogen worked on, versus a fuel that essentially has no ability to develop anywhere beyond "grow more".


The achilles heel for hydrogen is the amount of energy needed to convert water to hydrogen. When the input power exceeds the output, it is always a losing proposition.


Not really. No matter what you're gonna lose some in the conversion. The benefit of hydrogen however is you can get energy from completely renewable sources, like solar or hydroelectric, you can burn it in a piston engine or a fuel cell, and the exhaust is water vapour.

The main issue right now, besides storing hydrogen, is of course using fossil fuels or nuclear to generate it...which obviously combined with inefficiencies means its a pretty stupid idea.

But it has a future, somewhere. That or batteries if we can make them from something other then tons of nickle and other polluting industries, make them charge faster, and make them last more then a few brief years...

Top
#2886775 - 01/28/13 11:40 AM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: Nyquist]
Kestas Offline



Registered: 06/04/02
Posts: 11881
Loc: The Motor City
Originally Posted By: Nyquist
I agree that corn-based ethanol is probably an idea that does more harm that good, but I think it is temporary now. In the future I see companies developing a more efficient means of producing ethanol using various types of algaes.

They've been making vehicle fuel this way for at leaast four decades. This is more than temporary. It's a clear indication of the stranglehold special interests have on the public. The move away from corn could have and should have happened a long time ago.

Top
#2886894 - 01/28/13 01:18 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: Danno]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 18570
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: Danno
Originally Posted By: RiceCake
What I would like to see is hydrogen worked on, versus a fuel that essentially has no ability to develop anywhere beyond "grow more".


The achilles heel for hydrogen is the amount of energy needed to convert water to hydrogen. When the input power exceeds the output, it is always a losing proposition.


Then you better not study the production of ethanol for automobiles!!!!
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#2886895 - 01/28/13 01:20 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: Panzerman]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 18570
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: Panzerman
Its a perfect example of un-informed enviromentalist causing exactly the opposite of their intentions. Your car uses more gas, you use more water to make ethanol and it does more harm then good. Plus, the cost. The only place you can find non-ethanol in Florida is at Marinas and you pay out the Ying yang, but its still better than the agrevation of dealing with it in smalll engines. Now I wish they would clear cut all the dead trees down here, instead of being a "Save Old Florida" kick. Old trees use more oxygen then they make, again un-informed and hard headed enviro-nuts.



Please do not confuse the corn lobbyists with the environmentalists. The greenies simply helped, it was the corn lobby that did the heavy lifting here...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#2887676 - 01/29/13 03:09 AM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: MolaKule]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 36937
Loc: 'Stralia
The corn lobby is an indescribable evil, and have co-opted the greenies in supporting the unsupportable grain ethanol business.

They argue that feedlotting is efficient (same amount of land would raise many more cattle without a middleman, and have a far better health outcome for beef eaters...and vut out a lot of enviro arguments against meat).

They argue that the grains aren't suitable for human consumption anyway (but the land could be used for food grains or other stuff if it weren't for ethanol).

They take your tax money, and keep other renewables out of the scene.

If the grain/ethanol lobby were honest and serious, they'd run their farm equipment and transport on it...and we'd watch them disappear up their own fundamental orifice.

Top
#2888070 - 01/29/13 01:17 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: MolaKule]
Tempest Offline


Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 10611
Loc: Las Vegas NV
From the article:
Quote:
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, agri-firm ADM has contributed $10.46 million to politicians and spent $8.94 million on lobbying since 1990.


$45 billion in subsidies since 1980.
http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/201...l-subsidies.php


That's a VERY good return on investment. You can't get that kind of return on the open market.
_________________________
“Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.” --- Henry Rosovsky

Top
#2888130 - 01/29/13 02:18 PM Re: Another Look at Ethanol [Re: MolaKule]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 18570
Loc: Sunny Florida
Outstanding ROI. Lobbying Congress should be outlawed or at least heavily regulated.

Congressman are too cheap!
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 ... 9 10 >