Recent Topics
2004 Volvo XC-90 codes
by Kira - 08/20/19 01:42 PM
New Mercury v8?
by 1978elcamino - 08/20/19 01:42 PM
The World Over the Last Two Centuries
by buster - 08/20/19 01:30 PM
diesel injector cleaning/service
by DriveHard - 08/20/19 12:02 PM
Time for an oil change???
by RoadDukie - 08/20/19 12:00 PM
Pennzoil High Mileage conventional moly content.
by aquariuscsm - 08/20/19 11:59 AM
onboard auto tool kit
by phillyFX4 - 08/20/19 11:24 AM
No way to follow a thread?
by paulri - 08/20/19 10:59 AM
Schumacher Instant Power&Air
by Char Baby - 08/20/19 10:25 AM
PolishAngel - Engine
by buster - 08/20/19 08:59 AM
Pennzoil Platinum HM 5w20 15 Jeep GC 3.6L
by 1nighttrain - 08/20/19 08:42 AM
Any Midweight Moto Guzzi Fans Here?
by Silverado12 - 08/20/19 08:31 AM
Central AC drain pump fail, flood
by LeakySeals - 08/20/19 06:38 AM
WiFi “bridge” to outbuilding
by dlundblad - 08/20/19 05:00 AM
Rental review : 2019 Dodge Charger
by FirstNissan - 08/20/19 12:14 AM
Truck diesel oil in Lawn mower (SAE30)
by Polyalphaolefin - 08/19/19 11:18 PM
Pinstripes Not Popular on Pickup Trucks?
by LoneRanger - 08/19/19 10:04 PM
More choices
by KeithS_NW_Ohio - 08/19/19 09:43 PM
INEOS to Surpass EXOM in PAO production.
by MolaKule - 08/19/19 09:17 PM
Newest Members
ticojr02, Timdetails, rangeseven, GNH82, BigMike61
69008 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
100 registered members (1978elcamino, AdditiveOCD, 2015_PSD, 2K2AcuraTL, 53' Stude, 13 invisible), 2,368 guests, and 26 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics293,563
Posts5,042,419
Members69,008
Most Online3,532
Jul 30th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
UOA article - what is "normal" #2780790 10/23/12 04:59 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
dnewton3 Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078

Last edited by dnewton3; 10/23/12 05:45 AM.

The act of preventative maintenance, in and of itself, is FAR MORE important than brand/grade/base choices among lubes and filters.
- under maintaining something is akin to abuse/neglect; that can kill equipment by shortening the lifespan
- over maintaining something has never been proven to be anything but a waste of time and money
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2780862 10/23/12 08:10 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,452
A
A_Harman Offline
Offline
A
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,452
Is that an article that you have just posted, or has it been on BITOG for a while? Regardless, thanks for the educational read!


1985 Z51 Corvette track car
2002 Camaro Z28 LS1/6-speed
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 diesel
1972 GMC 1500 shortbed project truck
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2780889 10/23/12 08:41 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,478
S
Samilcar Offline
Offline
S
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,478
Great article.

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: A_Harman] #2781094 10/23/12 11:35 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
dnewton3 Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
Originally Posted By: A_Harman
Is that an article that you have just posted, or has it been on BITOG for a while? Regardless, thanks for the educational read!


Wrote the bulk of it this month on vacation; been in editing and formatting for about a week.


The act of preventative maintenance, in and of itself, is FAR MORE important than brand/grade/base choices among lubes and filters.
- under maintaining something is akin to abuse/neglect; that can kill equipment by shortening the lifespan
- over maintaining something has never been proven to be anything but a waste of time and money
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2781368 10/23/12 03:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,682
L
ltslimjim Offline
Offline
L
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,682
Very nice. thumbsup


92 Civic Hatch (stolen frown RIP)
07 Honda Fit Sport (A/T) WELCOME thumbsup
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2781508 10/23/12 05:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 121
D
DanMiller Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 121
Very good article, what oil do you like based on all of the UOAs you have seen ? Are you a thick or thin oil believer ?

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2781539 10/23/12 06:19 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 40,264
O
OVERKILL Offline
Offline
O
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 40,264
Excellent article thumbsup


2019 RAM 1500 Sport - Mobil 1 EP 0w-20, FRAM Ultra
2016 Grand Cherokee SRT - Ravenol SSL 0w-40, FRAM Ultra
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2781562 10/23/12 06:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,282
J
JAG Offline
Offline
J
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,282
Thank you for the great article, Dave!

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2781611 10/23/12 07:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 31,648
B
buster Offline
Offline
B
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 31,648
Thanks Dave! thumbsup


2019 Nissan Frontier Pro 4X
2019 Subaru Impreza Sport
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2781850 10/24/12 12:35 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 121
D
DanMiller Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 121
Since leaving Oil in longer is better for wear numbers would it make sense to change the Oil filter in between Oil changes ?

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2781854 10/24/12 01:12 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,783
C
Clevy Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,783
That was a great article. Very enlightening. Wear rates going down as the oil gets more miles was very informative. Thank you for the enlightening information.


2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2782578 10/24/12 06:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,851
F
fdcg27 Offline
Offline
F
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,851
Really informative.
We here tend to get all excited about small differences in wear metals per thousand miles, but you have put it in perspective.
Maybe the only real use of UOAs is to find gross anomalies, like coolant leaking into the engine oil, or TBN and TAN as well as shear to determine oil life.


18 Accord Hybrid 10K HGMO 0W-20
17 Forester 24K VME 0W-20
12 Accord LX 115K SSO 0W-20
09 Forester 95K M1HM 10W-30
01 Focus ZX3 118K PP 5W-20
96 Accord LX 104K T5 10W-30
95 318i
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: DanMiller] #2782700 10/24/12 07:50 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 37,776
Q
Quattro Pete Offline
Offline
Q
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 37,776
Originally Posted By: DanMiller
Since leaving Oil in longer is better for wear numbers would it make sense to change the Oil filter in between Oil changes ?

Why? Filter efficiency increases with age/miles as well.

Only if you have a seriously sludged up engine that you should change filter more frequently, but then you should not be running extended OCIs either.

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: Quattro Pete] #2782944 10/25/12 01:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,528
H
HTSS_TR Offline
Offline
H
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,528
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: DanMiller
Since leaving Oil in longer is better for wear numbers would it make sense to change the Oil filter in between Oil changes ?

Why? Filter efficiency increases with age/miles as well.

Only if you have a seriously sludged up engine that you should change filter more frequently, but then you should not be running extended OCIs either.

I agree. I'm thinking about leaving cartridge oil filter in the E430 for 2 OCI's of 10-12k miles each OCI. I will inspect the oil filter carefully on the next oil change and re-use it if the filter is in good shape and I don't see any debris. The capacity of the fleece filter is more than 10 grams, it is not possible for the engine to generate more than 2-3 grams in 10k miles.


'00 MB E430
'04 Honda S2000
'06 Volvo V70
'14 Honda Accord LX
"Throwing food away is like stealing it from the poor and hungry" Pope Francis
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2782965 10/25/12 04:52 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
dnewton3 Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
The only way to know for sure it to get some PCs done (particle count analysis).

However, I would contend this; the OEM typically is as conservative with the FCI as they are the OCI.

There are a few notable exceptions. One such example is my (new to me) 2000 Galant with 2.4L engine. The "normal" OCI is 7.5k miles and the FCI is every other oil change, hence every 15k miles. That is with any filter that meets their OEM specs. And there are a whole host of filters from Purolator, Wix, Fram, etc that meet/exceed those specs, right on Wally's shelf. I am not saying all FCIs can be extended that far, but I am saying that as long as your UOA is showing good lube and engine health, the FCI should be able to at least go as long as the OCI. Only if your soot/involubles/oxidation were the drastically escalate in the UOA, would it indicate a need for FCI.

For my vehicles in warranty, (which I'm now down to only one), I am following the OEM criteria for O/FCIs. But for my other stuff, I'm beginning to push even the "normal" OCIs out and using the same filter for that duration.

I am going to put my money where my mouth is, too. I have an upcoming trip out west; we'll be taking my 1995 Villager that has 225k miles on it, and an estimated 6k on the oil by the time we leave. I expect it will have near 10k miles on the lube when we return. I look forward to seeing the UOA when I get back. Am I nervous? You bet I am; I'm always nervous a bit when I try something new. But I have faith in my data streams and SAE studies I've read. This is solid science; just because it's hard to believe, do not make it untrue.

Last edited by dnewton3; 10/25/12 04:55 AM.

The act of preventative maintenance, in and of itself, is FAR MORE important than brand/grade/base choices among lubes and filters.
- under maintaining something is akin to abuse/neglect; that can kill equipment by shortening the lifespan
- over maintaining something has never been proven to be anything but a waste of time and money
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: HTSS_TR] #2783154 10/25/12 09:47 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 121
D
DanMiller Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 121
Interesting, I would have thought changing the filter would be good. I have never heard that the filters become more efficient
I would assume you guys are taking about a higher quality filter.

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2783166 10/25/12 09:56 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
dnewton3 Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
Actually, just about any filter will become "better" with age.

Now - first we have to exclude situations where filters are used TOO far, or are WAY too old.

But in "normal" use, just about any filter increases it's efficiency. Simple explanation; as the media loads up, it closes down the pore size to ever tighter openings, thus reducing the size of particle that can pass through the next time. It's a self-fulfilling prophesey; the more it traps, the smaller particle it can trap, which goes round and round ...

Only if the media were to become blinded off to a point where th bypass were to open frequnelty/always, would there be an issue. That is typcially much further out than folks think.

Ironically, we are programmed as a society to always think that "new" is "better". In some examples, I would completely agree with that. "Newer" engine designs certainly are "better"; they run cleaner, get better fuel economy, and have more power density per displacement. And "newer" oils are also "better"; oils that are made today have stronger add-packs, and more robust base stocks due to refining and manufacturing capabilities.

But dumping in "new" engine oil and putting on a "new" filter (say every 3k miles versus every 7.5k miles) really does not achieve what folks think it does. As oil ages in the crankcase, and filters catch more particulate, they both actually improve as the miles pass.

And that is particularlly what this article shows. Between the SAE studies, and my data bank evidence of many thousands of UOAs, wear rates actually do go down as the lube system matures. It is beneficial to leave the oil in place as long as practical; there is litte benefit to changing oil often on some blind-obedience schedule.

Last edited by dnewton3; 10/25/12 09:59 AM.

The act of preventative maintenance, in and of itself, is FAR MORE important than brand/grade/base choices among lubes and filters.
- under maintaining something is akin to abuse/neglect; that can kill equipment by shortening the lifespan
- over maintaining something has never been proven to be anything but a waste of time and money
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2783583 10/25/12 04:26 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 121
D
DanMiller Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 121
Interesting your explaination makes alot of sense, have there been any studies that back this up ? I would be interested to read them ( not that I don't believe you ).

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2784008 10/26/12 04:39 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
dnewton3 Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
Plenty of studies in the SAE catalog; go to their site and buy what you will. I have purchased many over the years.


The act of preventative maintenance, in and of itself, is FAR MORE important than brand/grade/base choices among lubes and filters.
- under maintaining something is akin to abuse/neglect; that can kill equipment by shortening the lifespan
- over maintaining something has never been proven to be anything but a waste of time and money
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2793295 11/05/12 05:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 555
F
fpracha Offline
Offline
F
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 555
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
But dumping in "new" engine oil and putting on a "new" filter (say every 3k miles versus every 7.5k miles) really does not achieve what folks think it does. As oil ages in the crankcase, and filters catch more particulate, they both actually improve as the miles pass.

And that is particularlly what this article shows. Between the SAE studies, and my data bank evidence of many thousands of UOAs, wear rates actually do go down as the lube system matures. It is beneficial to leave the oil in place as long as practical; there is litte benefit to changing oil often on some blind-obedience schedule.
Incredible revelations and thanks for your scientific writeup!
So for the sake of an engine's operating efficiency, in your experience, is your article also proving that "as thin as possible" is the best oil to use in an engine ?
or is it so that such a conclusion cannot be drawn from your collective data and SAE research papers?

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2793326 11/05/12 07:17 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
dnewton3 Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
The SAE paper (2007-01-4133) specifically notes that there is a vis increase, and that increase is non-detrimental at the valve train. However, it also acknowledges the concerns of fuel economy from parasitic drag in the cylinder, where surface area affected by vis is much greater than at the valve train.

In short, it's a balancing act.

The thing I'm trying to get across to people is that shorter OCIs generally are a total waste of money. You don't "gain" any wear reduction; you actually increase wear in shorter OCIs. While it may be counter-intuitive to the layman, it makes sense when you see the studies and data.

There are certainly times when shorter OCIs are warranted; heavy contamination or sludge. But those are not nearly as common as some believe, and I have always excluded such examples from my generalizations. I would NEVER suggest extending an OCI when there is a known problem that cannot be mitigated without phsical intervention, or stalling with OCI frequency. And that is really what it's all about; you have to KNOW your equipment, and your lubes, to really understand what is good/bad decision wise. Too many people here blindly take a "kitchen sink" approach; they throw everything at the lube interval (short OCIs, syns) and call it "good" and they have no idea how define acceptable condemnation limits, and are unaware of how far out even conventional lubes can successfully go.

As I've said (and it's in my signature line) ...
ANY lube can be over or under utilized.

Last edited by dnewton3; 11/05/12 07:18 AM.

The act of preventative maintenance, in and of itself, is FAR MORE important than brand/grade/base choices among lubes and filters.
- under maintaining something is akin to abuse/neglect; that can kill equipment by shortening the lifespan
- over maintaining something has never been proven to be anything but a waste of time and money
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2795488 11/07/12 11:41 AM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11,067
W
wemay Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11,067
Fantastic article, thanks for sharing.

This is why i use Mobil Super 5000 or PYB 5W30 conventional in my Mitsu Lancer Ralliart Turbo. The vehicle is a daily driver (no modifications, no track use, very rare spirited drive). Now, because it is a turbo, and under powertrain warranty, i subscribe to a 3750 f/oci. There are huge battles on the Turbo forums between conventional vs synthetic oil users. I am not saying that conventional is better, it isn't. But also isnt neccesary for my application, oci or driving style. Mitsubishi and all the major oil giants list conventional 5w30 as the requied oil. I just make sure it meets API SN, GF-5 ILSAC.


Again, thanks for sharing.

Last edited by wemay; 11/07/12 11:45 AM.

2018 KIA Sportage LX 2.4 AWD:
EDGE 5W30, PH9688

2013 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport 2.0T:
M1HM 10W30, ULTRA XG9688
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2796242 11/08/12 03:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,060
G
Garak Offline
Offline
G
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,060
Dave, I was doing some thinking about the deposition of anti-wear films with respect to the oils we see now compared to what was seen a couple decades ago. Now we see that the anti-wear protection does better much further into the OCI. I'm wondering how much of that is due to the lower ZDDP oils we see. Also, we certainly see some very high ZDDP applications for break in lubes. I'm just wondering how things might have compared back in the day, with, of course, some consideration of the fact that oils were much poorer back then, too.

As an aside, I do think we place too much stock into how much ZDDP was in the older oils. Some certainly had some high levels, but a lot of them (check Blackstone's articles) had the same as PCMOs today, or even much less. Back then, ZDDP content was a bit of a gamble, even with the top brand oils. Today, at least, you know you're going to get in the neighbourhood of 750 ppm, with few exceptions.

Just because the phosphorous limits didn't exist back then didn't mean oil companies made sure all oils had 1400 ppm ZDDP, either.


Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 - Shell ROTELLA T6 Multi-Vehicle 5w-30, Wix 57356
1984 F-150 4.9L - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2796282 11/08/12 06:13 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
dnewton3 Offline OP
Global Moderator
OP Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,078
When reading the SAE study they mention there are actually several different types of ZDDP compounds that can be used. The chemical make-up of the ZDDP does indeed affect the anti-wear layers. It also disucsses the affects of detergent packages reacting with the ZDDP and having a negative affect on the anti-wear layer.

Ryan Start (Blackstone) ran an oil in his truck that had zero ZDDP whatsoever; the package was formulated in alternative ways. I think it was an aero-oil, IIRC. Anyway - after a couple short OCIs, there was no abnormal wear due to the lack of ZDDP. The wear that was present was due to two things:
1) the old 350 GM simply is a high-wear engine to begin with (see proof in my article)
2) the engine was a new rebuild - break in was occuring

So the "need" for ZDDP is greatly overblown in his opinion, and in mine. Wear can be attenuated by a large multitude of methods; ZDDP is just one of them. And while "ZDDP" is a description of an anti-wear additive, it tells us nothing of the actual sub-chemical composition. The nuiances really matter, as to the formation (or destruction) of the anti-wear layer.


Of course, getting the bulk of BITOGers to acknowledge this is difficult. And getting them to actually agree to it is nearly impossible. Regardless of how much proof (SAE study and Stark's example) one lays down. The oil bigotry runs deep here; long, wide and deep. Despite the facts.

Last edited by dnewton3; 11/08/12 06:16 AM.

The act of preventative maintenance, in and of itself, is FAR MORE important than brand/grade/base choices among lubes and filters.
- under maintaining something is akin to abuse/neglect; that can kill equipment by shortening the lifespan
- over maintaining something has never been proven to be anything but a waste of time and money
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2796466 11/08/12 10:42 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,060
G
Garak Offline
Offline
G
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,060
Well, one thing about the old small blocks, you could throw all the ZDDP at them you wanted to, of whatever chemical makeup, and it would eat cams anyhow. wink

As for detergent packages, I suppose that's one reason why certain racing oils have little to no detergent and a boat load of zinc. As for me, I'd rather run an oil with some ZDDP (as opposed to some aero oil), but I'm not seeing the ZDDP levels of older oils with rose tinted glasses, either. The only "dated" oils I can think of that would have guaranteed high levels of ZDDP were some of the older spec dual rated HDEOs. For the rest, oil companies figured out long ago they could cut phosphorous from the oil and save some cash without API/ILSAC telling them to do so.


Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 - Shell ROTELLA T6 Multi-Vehicle 5w-30, Wix 57356
1984 F-150 4.9L - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2819033 11/30/12 10:37 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 568
S
Sam_Julier Offline
Offline
S
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 568
David, My sincere appreciation for your efforts in preparing this article. Would it be possible to post a pdf of this article? Printing from the home page of the site produces screened typeface which is difficult to read. Thank you.


2013 Toyota Avalon Hybrid PPHM 0W20, 70k
1993 Volvo 245 T5 10W30, 157k
1993 Volvo 244 T5 10W30, 169k

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2875734 01/18/13 07:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,339
Z
zerosoma Offline
Offline
Z
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,339
So, barring any problems with the engine - and I KNOW each case is different, but just for the sake of a blanket statement, a guy could run a conventional out to typical synthetic oci's (~10k range) without much cause for concern, pending that his engine was in good shape and the oil was a name brand...?


2012 Toyota Camry SE 4 cyl (56,500) - dealer's choice
2002 Toyota Solara 3.0L V6 (240k) - Havoline DS 10w30 (junkyard)
2002 Lexus RX300 (188K) - Havoline Synthetic 5w30
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #2912295 02/19/13 02:18 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 18
S
Stubb Offline
Offline
S
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 18
I am very interested in the "wear versus miles" analysis you performed, as a misunderstanding of this can be the basis for claims about oil quality and wear. From looking at your data presented, it seems that you could perform a regression analysis on your data to model the slope. This may provide a "wear rate" that is informative and distinguishing among oils or applications. This might also define an endpoint for an oil by identifying an inversion point on the slope. Further, examination of short-interval data across multiple changes (a paired analysis of data) may show an average initial rate due to tribochemical reaction with the new material. If this is truly wear (the metal has to come from somewhere) it would seem that a goal of lubricant design would be to reduce that initial wear rate.

Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #3139690 09/29/13 06:23 PM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,229
D
dustyroads Offline
Offline
D
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,229
I read your article late last year when I had just found this site and knew very little about the things we discuss on bitog. I just read it again and have much more appreciation for it now. I plan to make use of the info (the best I can), although I still have a lot to learn.

Thanks Dave !


2013 F150 XLT 5.0 4X4 115k
Re: UOA article - what is "normal" [Re: dnewton3] #5108022 05/17/19 08:40 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 33
O
OCDoiler Offline
Offline
O
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 33
Very interesting 👍


Implementing the 5 P's in all facets of life...
2018 Tundra
2015 4Runner
1998 Acura CL
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™