Recent Topics
Looking for Fram Ultra XG30 and XG5 cut open
by rubberchicken. 12/12/18 10:27 PM
92 f150 332 code
by ram_man. 12/12/18 10:05 PM
Mixing brands of brake fluid / gear lube
by SureshR. 12/12/18 09:26 PM
45,000 miles in the Caprice.
by ls1mike. 12/12/18 09:21 PM
Quality oils?
by Horsehaulin. 12/12/18 09:16 PM
Exhaust fumes in cabin
by Skater4life27. 12/12/18 08:40 PM
Squeaky sunroof
by dishdude. 12/12/18 08:09 PM
Liqui Moly Top Tec 1800
by Chuckh. 12/12/18 07:56 PM
2006 Pathfinder Transmission Shudder
by Bluestream. 12/12/18 07:10 PM
Maybe E-10 is better? - PentaStar (Flex Fuel)
by StevieC. 12/12/18 06:52 PM
Shipping cost
by Fitter30. 12/12/18 06:45 PM
Purolator P1 14476 CUT OPEN
by 53' Stude. 12/12/18 06:00 PM
Which car to buy?
by jrcowboys. 12/12/18 04:55 PM
New Tire Cracking
by robd. 12/12/18 04:43 PM
SAR B6P - Thoughts?
by 28oz. 12/12/18 03:59 PM
Time to sell the 1-ton Dually
by 02SE. 12/12/18 03:55 PM
Shell Rotella Grease
by WMW0505. 12/12/18 02:27 PM
Need to add attic ladder in stairwell
by Klutch9. 12/12/18 12:51 PM
Newest Members
Horsehaulin, JLew, bmrk1100, Rrrracer, jefe_de_estado
66664 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
45 registered members (CaspianM, A_User55555, Bailes1992, AP9, 69GTX, BLND1, 3 invisible), 1,202 guests, and 39 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics295,007
Posts4,925,864
Members66,664
Most Online2,553
Oct 27th, 2018
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 9 1 2 9
Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 #2557743
03/05/12 11:51 AM
03/05/12 11:51 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,194
Albany, NY
Nick R Offline OP
Nick R  Offline OP
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,194
Albany, NY
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/hatc...ec_first_drive/

Sounds pretty impressive, the amount of work dedicated to prevent overfueling is pretty imressive. But of all the interesting numbers, the most interesting of those was the fact that the turbo spins to 248,000RPM. HOLY COW. What do you think, will it work here in the US?

Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: Nick R] #2557751
03/05/12 11:58 AM
03/05/12 11:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 42,295
New Jersey
JHZR2 Offline
JHZR2  Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 42,295
New Jersey
You mean someone can safely merge onto an autobahn with that engine? No way! its impossible!.

LOL.

I think it would be fine. Tons of folks logged millions if not billions of miles on lesser 3 cyl engines in the not so distant past.

Its just the know-it-alls who cant seem to be safe without 6+ cyl and 300 hp that are dangerous.

Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: JHZR2] #2557764
03/05/12 12:05 PM
03/05/12 12:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,560
Boston, MA
HerrStig Offline
HerrStig  Offline
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,560
Boston, MA
Small V6 engines are a pretty good compromise here where low end grunt is more important than how fast you can go on the Autobahn. A Toyota V6 is gonna need a whole lot less TLC that one of these 1 liter buzzbombs. In the US we are not real kind to high output/liter engines. Folks buy them and then treat them like 302 Chevys. Change the oil once a year whether it needs it or not. SAAB sold a lot (for them anyway) of turbo models in the 80's, many ended up in the hands of devoted owners and ran a long time, others were owned by those who bought them because they were "PC" for a while, and treated them like any other car. No long and happy life there. Start it cold, rev it a few times, and jam it into gear. The SAAB 9000, in the end, had a V6 option. I am sure I would properly care for an "ecoboost" but I don't know about the rest of the folks in my neighborhood.

Last edited by HerrStig; 03/05/12 12:15 PM.
Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: Nick R] #2557779
03/05/12 12:16 PM
03/05/12 12:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,061
usa
tommygunn Offline
tommygunn  Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,061
usa
I would like to see one in the Fusion. The 3 cyl is suppose to replace the 4 Cyl.

There is 1 brand new spark plug sitting by itself in my toolbox and it took me a minute to figure out why there was one. I used to have a 3 cyl Geo Metro and I had to buy spark plugs in packs of 4!


i am a [censored] who hides behind bugmenot.
i also like applying negative pressure to a certain male appendage.
Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: Nick R] #2557780
03/05/12 12:17 PM
03/05/12 12:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,256
USA
rjundi Offline
rjundi  Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,256
USA
Its sounds great on paper.

The complicated economy car can carry upper end car maintenance bills in its elder years. Especially bleeding edge technology. A few expensive repairs buy a lot of fuel for a less complex slightly thirstier I4.

Then again the majority of car buyers though only keep them four years anyway.

Last edited by rjundi; 03/05/12 12:20 PM.

---
Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: rjundi] #2557784
03/05/12 12:20 PM
03/05/12 12:20 PM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,194
Albany, NY
Nick R Offline OP
Nick R  Offline OP
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,194
Albany, NY
Originally Posted By: rjundi
Its sounds great on paper.

The complicated economy car can carry upper end car maintenance bills in its elder years. Especially bleeding edge technology. A few expensive repairs buy a lot of fuel for a less complex slightly thirstier I4.


The problem with this is people are under the presumption that they WILL have expensive repair bills. What I mean is, these cars are too new to tell whether they will prove reliable long-term or now. I'm sure I'll find out firsthand when my cruze gets older.

Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: Nick R] #2557785
03/05/12 12:20 PM
03/05/12 12:20 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,021
Canuck living in California
KrisZ Online content
KrisZ  Online Content
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,021
Canuck living in California
I think Saab had a good set up. Low pressure and slow spinning turbos, coupled with fair size engines, and they returned very good fuel economy for car size.

I think that those small displacement engines with high pressure, fast spinning turbos are a turn in the wrong direction as far as reliability and fuel economy goes. High boost operation will return poor economy.
I would rather see a 1.8-2.0L engine with a low pressure turbo.


2015 Dodge Grand Caravan-27k miles.
2006 Mazda 3-163k miles
Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: HerrStig] #2557789
03/05/12 12:24 PM
03/05/12 12:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 37,917
Ontario, Canada
OVERKILL Offline
OVERKILL  Offline
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 37,917
Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: HerrStig
Folks buy them and then treat them like 302 Chevys. Change the oil once a year whether it needs it or not.


The last time GM made a 302 was like 1970, LOL! grin

I assume you are thinking of a 350? Or Ford 302?


2018 RAM 1500 Big Horn EcoDiesel
2016 Grand Cherokee SRT
Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: OVERKILL] #2557816
03/05/12 12:41 PM
03/05/12 12:41 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 42,295
New Jersey
JHZR2 Offline
JHZR2  Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 42,295
New Jersey
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Originally Posted By: HerrStig
Folks buy them and then treat them like 302 Chevys. Change the oil once a year whether it needs it or not.


The last time GM made a 302 was like 1970, LOL! grin

I assume you are thinking of a 350? Or Ford 302?


305 Ill bet...

Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: Nick R] #2557817
03/05/12 12:41 PM
03/05/12 12:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,491
TX
DrDusty86 Offline
DrDusty86  Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,491
TX
I think with a 0-60 run of 12.5 seconds, people would get slammed in the rear by Semis trying to enter the highway. I would have to cut the driver some slack if they could not get up to the speed of traffic using the on ramp. I will break the tires lose in my Escort, and shift it a 7k to make 70-75mph if I need to. For ANYTHING more than a Smart, getting on the highway slower than the speed of traffic is [censored] dangerous and the BOZOs that pull this [censored] should be ticketed/lose points.
Dusty

Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: Nick R] #2557823
03/05/12 12:43 PM
03/05/12 12:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 42,295
New Jersey
JHZR2 Offline
JHZR2  Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 42,295
New Jersey
Originally Posted By: Nick R
Originally Posted By: rjundi
Its sounds great on paper.

The complicated economy car can carry upper end car maintenance bills in its elder years. Especially bleeding edge technology. A few expensive repairs buy a lot of fuel for a less complex slightly thirstier I4.


The problem with this is people are under the presumption that they WILL have expensive repair bills. What I mean is, these cars are too new to tell whether they will prove reliable long-term or now. I'm sure I'll find out firsthand when my cruze gets older.


Exactly. It seems like the concensus here is that the average American must be substantially dumber than the average European, who will run an engine like this, will sit in traffic, will encounter cold starts, and will fly off of a highway and shut down the endine at a rest stop just like here in the USA.

Id sure like to know what makes the USA so tough, unless it is that our owners are dumber and less caring than Europeans.

Otherwise there is no reason why the vehicles cant operate and last.

And if those folks have to change their paradigm of maintenance, the dollar is going to snag them one way or another...

Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: Nick R] #2557824
03/05/12 12:44 PM
03/05/12 12:44 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,074
Great White North.. eh
webfors Offline
webfors  Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,074
Great White North.. eh
Brings back memories of that I3 turbo from Suzuki... Forsa turbo!! Only had about 80hp, but drove spiritedly.


17 Cadillac ATS 2.0T, Edge D1G2 5w30, XG10575
17 Dodge GC, VWB 5w20, Fram DL11665
15 DL650, Rotella T6 5w40, KN-138
Small engines; RT5 10w30
Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: DrDusty86] #2557825
03/05/12 12:45 PM
03/05/12 12:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 42,295
New Jersey
JHZR2 Offline
JHZR2  Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 42,295
New Jersey
Originally Posted By: DrDusty86
I think with a 0-60 run of 12.5 seconds, people would get slammed in the rear by Semis trying to enter the highway. I would have to cut the driver some slack if they could not get up to the speed of traffic using the on ramp. I will break the tires lose in my Escort, and shift it a 7k to make 70-75mph if I need to. For ANYTHING more than a Smart, getting on the highway slower than the speed of traffic is [censored] dangerous and the BOZOs that pull this [censored] should be ticketed/lose points.
Dusty


What is the 0-60 of a semi that is merging onto the highway from that same onramp? Does it routinely get slammed into?

That "safety" argument is a poor one, IMO.

Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: Nick R] #2557838
03/05/12 01:00 PM
03/05/12 01:00 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline
Hokiefyd  Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
My '84 Cutlass would probably struggle to make 60 in much under 12.5 seconds, but merging onto a busy expressway was never a problem. My current vehicle, only 166 horsepower moving 3500 pounds, never leaves me wanting for more power. I've never had issues with "power", and most of the vehicles I've owned haven't been fast vehicles. Slowest was probably that Cutlass or my '95 Nissan pickup. Four cylinders, four wheel drive, 5 forward speeds. It wasn't quick, but it got the job done.

And I've never been rearended. Take that as you will.

Re: Focus Ecoboost 1.0L I-3 [Re: Nick R] #2557841
03/05/12 01:06 PM
03/05/12 01:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,271
Dallas Texas
45ACP Offline
45ACP  Offline
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,271
Dallas Texas
3-cyl cars:

1. Suzuki Swift/Geo Metro.
2. DAIHATSU (please confirm?)
3. Really thought the Festiva was a 3.

I hat the Geo Metro XFis can still get $2500.. from 1992..

Thoughts on these?

Oh, and i vote 89 Volkswagen FOX 4-speed for slowest car...

Page 1 of 9 1 2 9

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™