Donald,
Seems like I follow you around BITOG, only to (attempt) to rain on your parade!
Here's my experience and
opinion on rust converters. I desperately want to believe in them, but so far I am disappointed.
- Internet search will teach you that there are two basic types: phosphoric acid (Krud Kutter) and tannic acid.
- Google "rust converters" and study the various brands and they look
VERY convincing.
- Google "rust converter research", and you come up with 3 studies (US ARMY, Brazil, Canadian/US.ongoing study) with stuff like this: Brazil...."The conversion of rusts formed in alternated immersion tests succeeded with a formula based on tannic and phosphoric acids as proven by spectroscopic analysis........In spite of this, no significant difference on the performance of converted and no-converted painted samples was verified which would justify the use of a rust converter."
I have tried the phosphoric type on equipment and buildings with mediocre results. I want to try the tannic acid type next, as the original Canadian study(now U.S) suggested this might be better.
In my opinion, the products like POR 15 work because you do both extensive treatment of the rust, then you ENCAPSULATE it. Face it, if you can completely keep moisture and oxygen away (paint, grease, wax, whatever), the rust should be subdued.
I wonder if the anecdotal results with products like OSPHO are due to the converter or the primer/paint afterwords?
Man, the marketing hype sure is convincing, though. I am still in denial, in spite of my real experiences.
Ironically, one product that seemed to work for me years ago was Rustoleum rusty metal primer, which is very old school, fish oil based technology. Hmmmmmm.