I'm confused: you and I are usually on the same page.
Originally Posted By: unDummy
If someone choses an inferior fluid for the local $1 jobber lot, then they deserve a failure.
Agreed.
Originally Posted By: unDummy
I've never seen a failure with a Honda transmission attributed to using a recommended ATF.
I am wearing the t-shirt. Unhappy honda trans after using quality, non-honda, "recommended" fluid. Assuming by "recommended" that it's not honda recommended, but 3rd party recommended. 3rd party multi vehicle atf (maybe it was valvoline.... been several years?) actually gave a better shift feel, but within 2 months AT behavior became to change and at 6 it was almost undriveable (swapped back to Z1 and it came 85% back to normal but never fully recovered).
Originally Posted By: unDummy
Guess what, a majority of failures happen while using Z1.
Ok, maybe I misinterpreted what you meant by bigfoot sighting... thought you were saying that any failure on a non-oem fluid is just heresay or not-provable. [/quote]
Originally Posted By: unDummy
And, its bigfoot sighting. If you have a garbage transmission, garbage maintenance interval, driver neglect and abuse, its going to fail. So, enjoy blaming the fluid. I know otherwise.
Maybe I'm tired, but this statement confuses me... almost seems to contradict what you are saying above. Also rather harsh?
All of my ATs get "severe service" or more often intervals. That CR-v had a strict Z1 diet until I got adventurous. It was never the same. I used BITOG-well-regarded fluids.