I was in Vegas in July a few years ago and it was 107F and my Fairbanks trip in Jan was iirc, -22F and had "cold starts" in both places ...
Wonder which one did more damage to the engine?
Or a very good flowing 5W may best that sometimes.
Thank you, a concept that is very poorly understood by many.Indeed. I don't see why people fixate on 0W being the end all, be all for cold start protection. Most 0w-40 will have a higher viscosity at 0 degrees than most 5w-20 and 5w-30 oils. Just because an oil flows at extremely cold temps (where the 0W rating comes into play) does not mean it flows better or has a thinner viscosity at more moderate temps, like those experienced in most winter climates in North America.
Tricky question. Cold as in freezing and the oil is thick and will not or very slowly makes its way to the oil pump like sucking a really thick milk shake through a straw? Or just a cold start when the fuel mixture is rich, the heat activated additives aren't hot, or the pistons aren't heated up so they are still oval and are loser in the cylinder bores, or after sitting a while the crank and rods have settled them selves and are potentially too close to their bearings or the oil drained from the can and valve train assemble and are rattling for a few seconds? Honestly it is not worth worrying about other than the oil pumping .Whether it's an additive, or a certain type of base stock, or both.
Titanium? Moly? "Intelligent molecules?" Etc...
+1Boron.
Indeed. I don't see why people fixate on 0W being the end all, be all for cold start protection. Most 0w-40 will have a higher viscosity at 0 degrees than most 5w-20 and 5w-30 oils. Just because an oil flows at extremely cold temps (where the 0W rating comes into play) does not mean it flows better or has a thinner viscosity at more moderate temps, like those experienced in most winter climates in North America.
Lots of people (at least on bitog) use 0W in geographical locations that is not required. I am pretty sure they know that but I think the fascination is more with the base oil quality than the cold flow.
The fascination is with being able to tell people they have a 0W oil in their car.
0w is the way to go for the best start up protection.
Redline HPMO is the way to go for the best start up protection.0w is the way to go for the best start up protection.
Indeed. I don't see why people fixate on 0W being the end all, be all for cold start protection. Most 0w-40 will have a higher viscosity at 0 degrees than most 5w-20 and 5w-30 oils. Just because an oil flows at extremely cold temps (where the 0W rating comes into play) does not mean it flows better or has a thinner viscosity at more moderate temps, like those experienced in most winter climates in North America.
The logic with most of the 0w-40's is that they meet some of the most demanding specs and approvals so they've had to jump through a lot more hoops than your typical GF-5 5w-30.
Tricky question. Cold as in freezing and the oil is thick and will not or very slowly makes its way to the oil pump like sucking a really thick milk shake through a straw?
Castrol again? The oil meets the performance specification for a 0W rated oil, how is that inferior? They say 0W because it is a 0W rated oil.GC 0W-30 seems to get knocked for being another poor cold flowing 0W oil. Castrol again. Thicker oils as well, I wonder if that impacts on their poorer cold performance. They say 0W.
Mobil 1 on the other hand, let's say 0W-40 for example, I wonder it's cold flow performance, including vs a 5W.. Interesting.
Since 0W is being mentioned here is a cold flow test with a bunch of 0w20's and one 5W30. The 0w20's are very much alike and pour faster than the single 5w30. The -32 C temp happens to correspond to the lowest temp I have seen at my location in the past few years. For your entertainment.