Originally Posted by buster
95% of UFO's can be explained. However, some people just like to argue. It's not about being curious, open minded or even skeptical. These people are so dense they wouldn't believe it if one landed on their front lawn.
The flip side is you have folks that think a drone from Best Buy is from the Zeta Reticuli Star System.
No, it is not necessarily about being not curious, dense, argumentative or closed minded, but being skeptical and I fall into the latter category when I compare the physics to what is reported or supposedly seen.
As I posted in #5284578, some of the calculations done by the Metabunk participants DO question the resulting images of the technology used so we
cannot, at this point in time, rule out that what was seen were artifacts.
MetaBunk Discussion of Videos:
https://www.metabunk.org/go-fast-fo...-stars-academy-bird-balloon.t9569/page-2
As far as the Navy is concerned you can bet your bippy there is a lot of analysis going on as to whether or not these images were real or artifacts, or even concerned about it.
If these were training artifacts embedded into the ship's radar algorithms and the plane's systems, we will never know it. That too, cannot be ruled out.