Schwarzenegger Opens Stop on 'Hydrogen Highway'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 4, 2003
Messages
244
Location
U. P. Michigan
Have you guys seen this yet? Schwarzenegger Opens Stop on 'Hydrogen Highway'.

Sometimes the Governator has the right idea
patriot.gif
burnout.gif
 
Isn't the by product of burning hydrogen, water?
This can also end droughts, just imagine how much water would be in SoCal if 15 million people are driving these cars and all the moisture it would produce??? Dunno, just a thought.
 
From the article:

"Dave Barthmuss, a GM spokesman, said that automakers consider cars powered by hydrogen fuel cells their "Holy Grail," since they would release only water as emissions and could end America's dependence on foreign oil."

Not until we figure out how to make very large quantities of hydrogen from something other than current fossil fuels as it is now. And as far as pollution reduction, currently, all we would accomplish is to move the pollution to the hydrogen production facility unless someone invents a process to inexpensively sequester the carbon during production.
 
quote:

Originally posted by keith:

quote:

Originally posted by Doug:
Isn't the by product of burning hydrogen, water?

All that extra water vapor will cause Global Warming.


No offense to you, I'm sure you're just mocking the typical unpleasable tree hugger nitpicking, but people overlook the fact that gas engines emit water too...
 
quote:

Originally posted by Palut:
No offense to you, I'm sure you're just mocking the typical unpleasable tree hugger nitpicking, but people overlook the fact that gas engines emit water too...

Water and a whole lot of other "stuff"

Until we all ride bikes, (or better yet, walk) transportation will make pollution.
The goal is to find that which makes the least pollution while conserving non-renewable resources.


quote:

Originally posted by 427Z06:
From the article:

"Dave Barthmuss, a GM spokesman, said that automakers consider cars powered by hydrogen fuel cells their "Holy Grail," since they would release only water as emissions and could end America's dependence on foreign oil."

Not until we figure out how to make very large quantities of hydrogen from something other than current fossil fuels as it is now. And as far as pollution reduction, currently, all we would accomplish is to move the pollution to the hydrogen production facility unless someone invents a process to inexpensively sequester the carbon during production.


Has there been any progress made on producing large quantities hydrogen by electrolysis, breaking water into its component hydrogen and oxygen? I caught a glimpse of an article about electrolysis for oxygen production that considers hydrogen an unwanted by-product. Seems to me that ‘unwanted by-product’ is actually quite valuable.

I found a link to a lot of links about hydrogen production. EERE Information Center
There is a lot of information here.
 
quote:

Originally posted by labman:
I hate to see tax money being blown on hydrogen boondoggles.

What seems to be lacking in any of the Mary Poppins hydrogen news releases is any reference to a solid analysis of what it would take to make a hydrogen fueled system work in the real world. I don't expect to see that analysis in the forseable future.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Dewlanna:
Has there been any progress made on producing large quantities hydrogen by electrolysis, breaking water into its component hydrogen and oxygen?
Ever calculate how much energy it takes to produce hydrogen from electrolysis?


quote:


I caught a glimpse of an article about electrolysis for oxygen production that considers hydrogen an unwanted by-product. Seems to me that ‘unwanted by-product’ is actually quite valuable.
Yep. All the engineers and scientists in the world missed that one. Glad you caught it. Mankind is now saved. Thanks.
 
quote:

Originally posted by 427Z06:
Originally posted by Dewlanna:
[qb]
Has there been any progress made on producing large quantities hydrogen by electrolysis, breaking water into its component hydrogen and oxygen?
Ever calculate how much energy it takes to produce hydrogen from electrolysis?

You would be better off just to use the electricity to recharge batteries in an electric car.
 
About 4.3kWhr for 1 cubic metre of hydrogen gas.

16MJ in, 10MJ out.

Now consider that the electricity is generated at 40% efficiency, and the hydrogen is burned at 30%, or maybe 60% in a fuel cell.

Not to mention that it's a very slippery gas, so transport losses will be considerable.

I'd like hydrogen to be part of the answer, and it is a part......not the whole answer.
 
With nuke power Hydrogen would be much more feasable. On the other hand the greenies hate nuke power.What about the infrastructure problems?
 
quote:

Originally posted by blano:
With nuke power Hydrogen would be much more feasable. On the other hand the greenies hate nuke power.What about the infrastructure problems?

If a hydrogen system were to be developed, the only reasonable way to produce the hydrogen is by electrolysis of water.

That requires a lot more electricity than we produce today and more infrastructure )power lines, power stations...) to generate and transmit the power.

The electricity can come from multiple sources. That's one of the beautys of electrical power. You can generate it many ways. For now we could use all present power sources to generate electricty. Then more nuclear and more photovoltaic. Maybe thermonuclear some day.

New hydrogen filling stations for cars would be needed. Their primary inputs would be electrical power and water. Lots of electrical power and not real big amount of water. Roughly the same quantity of water that a gas station moves in gasoline each day.

If you know how many gallons of gasoline a big gas station pumps today, it's simple to calculate how much electrical power it would take to produce an equivilant amount of hydrogen. Without going out on a limb, one could confidently say it would be metric sh*tload of electrical power.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom