Toyota pre-mixed SLLC in Canada is 55/45 by default.
I’d simply do a drain and fill at the radiator and call it a day. Save the thermostat for when/if you need it. You should be good to go.So, I took out some coolant with a turkey baster and it actually looks perfectly fine. I was able to find some pink long life concentrate and bought an OEM stat as well. It's still good to have those items on hand, but also to know that I don't need to panic and flush the coolant immediately. It seems I was probably being paranoid because the previous owner never mentioned/didn't know about the cooling system history. Should I still change the coolant in the near future? The car is eleven years old with 170k and the coolant service interval is 5 years/150k. I can't thank you guys enough
Does it look dirty in the coolant recovery bottle? If so then you might have a problem.It probably has been mentioned already, but Toyota coolant always seems to look “rusty” when it’s in the radiator...and then when you drain it, it looks like the normal pinkish color that it’s supposed to be.
I don’t know if it’s just how the color of the coolant reflects off the metal in the radiator, or what, but it always looks “dirty” to me.
The truth is that you can do rad drains only and fill with 50/50 coolant if you plan on keeping the car for 10 years or so. Draining the rad, depending on the vehicle gets out about half the coolant, so the contrubution of the fresh corrosion inhibitors is only about half of what it could be. If you are planning on trying to get 200,000 miles on a vehicle, which might take 15 years you are better off doing flushes with water and using concentrated coolant. This is all empirical and hard to predict, but if you have a mechanic tear your dashboard apart to change a heater core in a ten year old car, it becomes harsh reality pretty quick.
And sure, that can work, if you commit to do it twice as many times. On some vehicles like my Chevy 3/4 ton, there is no petcock so you have to go through the fun job of pulling the the lower rad hose. Not too terribly bad when you buy the right tool like I did but still a PITA. The convenience off just draining the rad is lost in the hose removal. So yes, a debatable issue, with the rad drains you never get the inhibitors to full strength and with the 5 year full flush the existing inhibitors have to make if a full five years. I have a 20 year old car with the original rad and heater core doing the 5 year interval with a water flush. YRMV.Hmmmm. To me it seems that if you do complete flushes at the recommended mileage/time interval vs. doing partial drain and fills at a much shorter interval, you might end up with approximately the same effect regarding the additives effectiveness. The problem is that we don't have any facts to really assess this.
Let's take a 5 year coolant. During the last two years or so of a 5 year cycle are the additives weakened enough to make a difference? If a person does a drain and fill every two years do the additives remain at a level that no bad effects occur? We just don't know.
Based on my experience, I do know that today's coolants don't get the sediment, solder bloom, gunk build up that the old high silicate green coolants of many decades ago. I do both full and partial drains on vehicles and ag. equipment and there is zero sediment in the old fluid. Just my opinion and experience.