As said by a Ford engineer...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
595
Location
NJ
Came across this on the carbibles.com site, while I know the guys information isnt always correct, this is an email he got from a ford engineer who has been working with ford for 24 years.

"Some of the things in your site are true like the pure baloney that additive companies put out. I have been with Ford for 24 years in research and development for their power train division. I have forgotten more lube problems than 90% of so-called mechanics will ever know. I like the way some mechanics make statements like they're some sort of God without being able to back them up. All that mallarkey in some of the feedback above claiming 800,000 miles on a gas engine are laughable. There is so much that goes into producing engine oil that dumping "magic" additives into it is just criminal. The quality of most addatives is questionable at best. Whilst the names may be similar, the quality is not. Additives are blended at the proper rate, heat and in the proper proportions by the manufactures of their particular product.

Crude supplies are not all the same quality and the additives have to be adjusted for the quality of the base stock being used by each particular company, per batch. Dumping your own personal stuff will more than likely be way inferior to what the oil manufacturer uses. The chemicals will normally differ from the manufacturers blend, and can cancel each other out to the point where there will be no anti-wear properties left in the product. (This is one reason it's not wise to mix oils from different manufacturers together). Changing the oil from say Mobil to Shell and then to Pennzoil will have a negative effect on your engine from conflicting chemicals. Buy an oil that you may like and STICK TO THAT COMPANY'S product.

What you may get away with when using Shell may cause instant havoc with Valvoline. The major oil companies work closely with the auto manufacturers so that bearing material, seal material, roller bearings, ball bearings, and all other moving parts are not adversely affected by the oil products. This is especially true for automatic transmissions. DO NOT USE SOMETHING OTHER THAN WHAT IS SPECIFIED BY THE CAR MAKER FOR YOUR AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION.
Nothing in your site mentions surface finish of the journals, cylinder walls, lobing of the crank journals, or a whole host of mechanical reasons for engine life or engine early death regardless of what oil you use. Nobody has mentioned how wear is affected by hotrodding the vehicle. I can ruin any engine and oil combination that you want to give me in a few hours or less. I can wreck a transmission in 15 minutes.


What about user abuse and manufacturing defects? Grinding a crankshaft in the wrong direction of rotation will eat up the bearings in 5 to 10 minutes. Quality control during manufacturing is the key to long engine life along with following oil- and filter-change intervals as laid out by the manufacturer in your handbook that comes with the car (that nobody reads).


From Ford's perspective, they test Mobil way more than other brand. I pushed using Mobil synthetics for transmission use to eliminate low speed hot oil low pressure and the opposite problem of high speed high pressure and cold oil drag at any speed. More power is lost from pumping torque than from bearing and piston drag. Trying to keep oil pressure up to spec when hot requires a larger pump and more R.P.M. and when things are cold the pump has very high torque and most of the oil flow is going thru the pressure relief valve back into the oil pan. Wasted horsepower; it lowers gas mileage by 20 to 30%
If it takes only 12 to 15 horsepower to move the average car 60mph. and the engine plus the transmission are using 2 to 3 extra horsepower each due to high oil drag (being too thick) you can see how the C.A.F.E. ratings would not be favorable for Ford if we did not use synthetics. Engines on new Fords come with semi-synthetics and the dealerships only use this oil. Full synthetics are still better but cost more.
Conclusion: Read, learn, and use your brain. "

Any comments? I agree with the stick with one oil brand part, but not so much on the "switch brands and it'll ruin your engine part" Is there any truth behind the additives being able to cancel eachother out?
 
This guy is full of hot air.
smirk.gif
 
Quote:


Changing the oil from say Mobil to Shell and then to Pennzoil will have a negative effect on your engine from conflicting chemicals. Buy an oil that you may like and STICK TO THAT COMPANY'S product.




I guess I'm screwed.
smirk.gif


I guess also the bulk oil drum I saw at the local Ford dealer of Valvoline 10w30 conventional 2 years ago and now 5w-20 of QS 3 months ago is just a cover for their real oil.

And as far as them testing and using Mobil more than others. Mobil has changed their mix of their oils more than anyone else.

What a bunch of B S.
nono.gif


I've switched more times to different brands in so many cars over the years and they all are running fine. The UOAs come back fine.

Oh well, No wonder Ford is having problems if they have engineers like this.

Take care, Bill
patriot.gif
 
I suppose the use of "non approved" "non mercon V" synthetic ATF in my Ford F150 is going to cause trans failure any day now. Since I am currently at 190K miles, it was a bad choice.

Same goes for the engine, which still turns in stellar UOA numbers.
 
If, and I emphasize if, this guy is an engineer from Ford then I think there is some credence in what he is saying.Having dealt with many QA people in machine shops they basically say the same thing regarding the longevity of engines as it relates to the assembly process and the machining process. Metal quality and the like does have a big influence on lasting ability.Driving habits also play an important role in how an engine will react. To say that this guy is "blowing hot air" is a pretty quick judgement.Most of what is said does have some relevance.I am glad this note was posted a lot of good information and a lot of good responses.
 
I like most of what he said. Not following his advice doesn't mean you're going to grenade your engine and transmission, as some of you have already pointed out. But I have no problem at all agreeing with his comments regarding additives. Heck, that's what I've said all along...they know more about what their doing than we amateur chemists in garages. Same with transmission fluids.

Of course, this all my humble, amateur opinion...I could be wrong.
wink.gif
 
This "Engineer" states a lot of very true facts. Changing from oil brand to oil brand to oil brand is not a very good way to treat your vehicle's engine or transmission. Grease also works the same way. Each has its own formulation, and sometimes, (not always), these chemical make-ups do counter-react with each other and could cause bearings to seize and other negative reactions. I believe once you have found an oil that works well for your application to stick with it.
 
Quote:


Dumping your own personal stuff will more than likely be way inferior to what the oil manufacturer uses. The chemicals will normally differ from the manufacturers blend, and can cancel each other out to the point where there will be no anti-wear properties left in the product. (This is one reason it's not wise to mix oils from different manufacturers together). Changing the oil from say Mobil to Shell and then to Pennzoil will have a negative effect on your engine from conflicting chemicals. Buy an oil that you may like and STICK TO THAT COMPANY'S product.





"...no anti-wear properties left" is pure unadulterated dog puckey. The guy may very well know his Ford products. But I think I trust chemists and tribologists and lubrication suppliers, just a tad more.
 
LouDawg has it all in perspective.
I work as a chemist, own a construction company and have owned machine shops,my take is that it is amazing just how much I don`t know. I think we are all in the amateur mix when it comes down to it.We are just fortunate we can learn more everyday.
 
Also, Shell has been the factory fill supplier for Ford since 2005. (And before everyone starts jumping on the Conoco bandwagon, note I said "factory fill." ConcoPhillips makes the service fill Motorcraft oils but they do not have the factory fill contract.)
 
He probably things switching oil brands has a negative effect on the engine because he tests Mobil 1 so much
laugh.gif
 
He's talking like a car salesman to the general public and for that his advise will not lead anyone that has no idea of what he's talking about down the wrong path. By the way he sounds like a bureaucrat trying to talk like an engineer. His statements about additives sound a bit thin. His negative statements about mixing oils misses one point. One of the larger customers for all oil companies is the US Government. They have statement in their contracts that requires all API cert oils be compatible with each other no matter how they are mixed. We service some government lease vehicles and I've read these statements in our contracts with them. I think that if someone brewed up a conventional oil with an API cert that would clash with the other oils might just be creating a big problem for themselves
 
Quote:


One of the larger customers for all oil companies is the US Government. They have statement in their contracts that requires all API cert oils be compatible with each other no matter how they are mixed. We service some government lease vehicles and I've read these statements in our contracts with them.



Lonnie, do they clarify or define how they can measure or test compatibility? I have no doubt that they have these types of "requirements" in their contracts. But to me, it sounds like one of those typical bureaucratic stipulations that has no basis in the science behind it or any reasonable way to test for it. That is, it sounds good, but perhaps it can't really be measured. How willing or able is SOPUS able to assure compatibility with an XOM oil? The only thing they could go on, to my knowledge, is that they might both have the same API, ILSAC, or other ratings.

Am I missing something or completely wrong? If so, let me know. I always want to learn more.
 
I thought there is wording on most oil bottles, synthetic and dino, that their product is compatible with other similar oils. I can't believe switching oil brands (or even type) will damage or destroy an engine. If this was true there would be a lot of engine failures out there!
 
Quote:


Quote:


DO NOT USE SOMETHING OTHER THAN WHAT IS SPECIFIED BY THE CAR MAKER FOR YOUR AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION.




I'm quaking in my shoes with the Amsoil in my slush box...
smirk.gif





Yeah, me too. My poorly made Honda transmission has only lasted 110k of perfect shifts so far, 80k of it on Amsoil.
 
No oil is going to function optimally if it is diluted with additives from a different formula. It is best to pick one brand of oil and stick with it. But to say you're doing major harm to your engine if you use a different brand of oil at every change is absolute "hot air" nonsense.

I've seen a 2000 Dodge Intrepid with over 300,000 miles on it that was owned by a sales rep. He always got his oil changed on the road and rarely did the car get the same brand oil at two consecutive oil changes. Now maybe a Ford product would have self-destructed with a maintenance regimen like that, but his Dodge sure didn't.
 
B/S. Most Americans probably never use the same oil from change to change. In fact, most dealers and quick lube places change all the time from brand to brand not too mention the fact that the same brands change formulas anyway!
 
I read a tiny bit of truth, mixed in with some marketing, bean counting and a hefty dose of legal CYA and contingency/safety. The statement could have easily been written by a Honda engineer recommending ATF Z1...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom