In American law, the jury is the sole trier of fact.
One cannot be tried for the same offense twice unless the trial jury fails to reach a verdict.
One can, however, be charged with a different offense arising from the same set of events.
In this case, there is talk of bringing a federal criminal action against George Zimmerman.
Whether you agree with the verdict of the trial jury or not, and I don't, both sides had their day in court and Zimmerman was found not guilty of either murder or manslaughter.
I find it reprehensible that our Justice Department is actually considering charging GM under federal law, simply because some people believe that the trial jury reached the wrong result.
While I may feel that the jury erred, it is not appropriate to try this man again under a different statute.
This would not constitute double jeopardy as a matter of law, but it would be morally wrong as well as disrespectful of the jury system.
One cannot be tried for the same offense twice unless the trial jury fails to reach a verdict.
One can, however, be charged with a different offense arising from the same set of events.
In this case, there is talk of bringing a federal criminal action against George Zimmerman.
Whether you agree with the verdict of the trial jury or not, and I don't, both sides had their day in court and Zimmerman was found not guilty of either murder or manslaughter.
I find it reprehensible that our Justice Department is actually considering charging GM under federal law, simply because some people believe that the trial jury reached the wrong result.
While I may feel that the jury erred, it is not appropriate to try this man again under a different statute.
This would not constitute double jeopardy as a matter of law, but it would be morally wrong as well as disrespectful of the jury system.