- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,793
Well, the minivan guinea pig is stolen ..and that leaves the rest of the extended fleet to take the plunge. Since the youngsters are getting hard to wrangle in for service ..or just take too much time to accumulate mileage, I've decided to go REALLY radical and put this thin stuff in my 2.5 jeep engine.
Now I know what you're thinking, has he lost all his marbles or all his marbles minus one?? Well, seeing that this is a tractor engine with a timing chain that has responded well to heavier weights in the past ..and will shear your VII clean off, you have to ask yourself, do I feel lucky??
Super Duty 0w/10w
Vis 100 6.8
Vis 40 33.3
VI 160
ZN 1801
Moly 1801
P 1703
CA 3297
FE 3
TBN 9.26
Although this breaches the 20 weight visc range, it has too low a HTHS to be called a 0w-20. So in adapted industry nomenclature, it would probably have to be called 0w-10w. Bruce used a dash too much green polymer ...but it doesn't smell like gummy bears.
I'm going get Terry's take on this run. I wanted to involve him in the original Bruceblend® ..but a spot UOA showed 2400ppm of Cu (my exchangers were all copper - 3 of them) and Bruce wanted to reformulate. The rest of the numbers were below noise...but since we weren't staying with that original formula, I decided to skip Terry at that time. I had the new stuff in the minivan when it was stolen.
Now I know what you're thinking, has he lost all his marbles or all his marbles minus one?? Well, seeing that this is a tractor engine with a timing chain that has responded well to heavier weights in the past ..and will shear your VII clean off, you have to ask yourself, do I feel lucky??

Super Duty 0w/10w
Vis 100 6.8
Vis 40 33.3
VI 160
ZN 1801
Moly 1801
P 1703
CA 3297
FE 3
TBN 9.26
Although this breaches the 20 weight visc range, it has too low a HTHS to be called a 0w-20. So in adapted industry nomenclature, it would probably have to be called 0w-10w. Bruce used a dash too much green polymer ...but it doesn't smell like gummy bears.
I'm going get Terry's take on this run. I wanted to involve him in the original Bruceblend® ..but a spot UOA showed 2400ppm of Cu (my exchangers were all copper - 3 of them) and Bruce wanted to reformulate. The rest of the numbers were below noise...but since we weren't staying with that original formula, I decided to skip Terry at that time. I had the new stuff in the minivan when it was stolen.