Recent Topics
White and Priviliged? FAA Fixing
by Y_K
3 minutes 48 seconds ago
any decent atf additives for slight leaksa
by ram_man
43 minutes 5 seconds ago
Beretta ARX 100 ammo testing
by bsmithwins
49 minutes 24 seconds ago
Update: Mobil1 HM reducing consumption
by otis24
Today at 09:06 AM
5.7 Hemi Ram 1500
by Rojack
Today at 08:56 AM
Experiences with all seasons
by wings&wheels
Today at 08:51 AM
Changing cartridge oil filter - 2011 T&C.
by mrsilv04
Today at 08:44 AM
How can I look up what transmission a specific car
by 7055
Today at 07:58 AM
A boy,his flag,and a uniform.
by CourierDriver
Today at 07:14 AM
painting steel rims..
by dblshock
Today at 07:14 AM
Cobalt vs Cruze?
by supton
Today at 07:13 AM
Sea Foam Trans Tune or what?
by Egg_Head
Today at 06:39 AM
Newest Members
rsamerica, DaveSC95, Justin251, Rojack, LordHumongous
54061 Registered Users
Who's Online
95 registered (alphadog, Andrei, 00Max00, a2gtinut, 3800Series, 9 invisible), 1778 Guests and 112 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54061 Members
66 Forums
231707 Topics
3713612 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#742101 - 10/07/06 01:58 AM how to read a particle count test
lindermant Offline


Registered: 08/15/05
Posts: 344
Loc: NoVA
I had a PC test done with my most recent oil analysis. Blackstone didn't elaborate on what the numbers mean when they sent the report, and I didn't see anything on their website.

Code:

Particle Count
ISO Code (2) 14/10 clean
NAS 1638 Class 0
ISO Code (3) 14/13/11
>= 2 micron 252
>= 5 micron 93
>= 10 micron 25
>= 15 micron 10
>= 25 micron 2
>= 50 micron 0
>= 100 micron 0



I did a search for NAS 1638 and found the following table, which helps a little bit:



and I found this table for ISO Code:



but what is the difference between ISO Code (2) and ISO Code (3)?

It makes sense that the goal is to have as few particles as possible in the oil, but other than that it's greek to me

Top
#742102 - 10/07/06 02:37 AM Re: how to read a particle count test [Re: lindermant]
Gary Allan Offline


Registered: 09/28/02
Posts: 39806
Loc: Pottstown, PA
I'm lost (somewhat) too.

The >5um level should end up being your "14" ..since if falls between 80-160 and the >15um is the only one that qualifies for the "10"

However, I don't see anything that matches 13 (40-80).

Now 10 or 11 fit the 10 (>15um) particle count.

..but let's ignore the finer points here ... this is a 10k OEM (Filtech) filter.

Here's mine over 9k with a PureOne

ISO Particle Count: 17/16/13,
Particles were:
>2 micron = 1,666,
>5 mu = 617 mu,
>10mu = 170,
>15 mu = 66,
>25 mu = 15,
>50 mu = 1,
>100 mu = 0.

Yours looks darn clean for 10k
_________________________
http://lube-direct.com/gallan/

Top
#742103 - 10/07/06 03:13 AM Re: how to read a particle count test [Re: Gary Allan]
lindermant Offline


Registered: 08/15/05
Posts: 344
Loc: NoVA
Thanks GA, I was pretty surprised with the results from what I could interpret. I really think the Honda/Filtech filter a gem

Did Blackstone do your particle count? Which begs another question, do particle counts vary based on the shop that performs them (i.e. could they be scaled)? I remember reading a pc count for one of AEHass's rides and the numbers were pretty high...

Top
#742104 - 10/07/06 03:44 AM Re: how to read a particle count test [Re: lindermant]
Gary Allan Offline


Registered: 09/28/02
Posts: 39806
Loc: Pottstown, PA
Yes, it appears that Filtech, at least in your engine, is a very good combo. Makes you wonder why Fram is/was the alternative OEM

Blackstone did my PC ..and if you noticed ..they've got some incorrect number on mine too. I've got nothing that meets "17". I've got 18 for my >2

If I went from bottom to top (which can't be how they do it) my numbers would be (if I have read the chart correctly).

18/16/15/13/11/7 ..there's no 17 in my sample at all I'll assume that they were off by one in the 16/15 part of it.

Somehow, I think the fine doctor's PC is off by a factor of 10.

>5__________44864___81592______18349
>10_________3703_____4273_______3508
>15_________318______608________1255
>20_________109______350________523
>25_________42_______252________239
>50_________5________118_________27
>75_________1_________90__________6
>100________0_________64__________1

Either that ..or something is very "unright" mechanically and a very poor filter. I tend to lean toward improper calc by the lab.

PC should be PC ..however Dr. Haas's lab may not subscribe to industry standards for their test. They appear to have checked the entire liter of oil. I've always thought that this was "per 100ml sample" ..but I've seen some labs that use 50ml sample sizes for optical PC.

Someone has probably already gone over this a good bit back, but I probably didn't pay attention since most of us use Blackstone ..so we're mostly on the same page.
_________________________
http://lube-direct.com/gallan/

Top
#742105 - 10/07/06 10:15 AM Re: how to read a particle count test [Re: Gary Allan]
ekpolk Offline
The Regenerator


Registered: 04/05/04
Posts: 8881
Loc: Pensacola FL
There is a lot to consider here, and it's not an easy onion to peel. One thing that the PC does not tell us is what the particles are made of. If the particle is soft, or at least softer than the materials it may encounter in a tight clearance, then perhaps the particle gets damaged (crushed, comminuted, etc.) instead of the particle damaging the surfaces. It really would be nice to have some further info to put these numbers into proper context and to allow drawing more meaningful concusions from them.
_________________________
09 Camry Hybrid, Black (M1 5w-20, std flavor).
07 Avalon XLS, Cassis Pearl (GC 0w-30).
04 Prius, Black (GC -- 0w-30).

Top