Have you noticed how it seems these hi-tech oils are sometimes too "hi-tech" for these labs? Blackstone says they can't give accurate calcium readings when the level gets over 2000 ppm, yet we've got Mobil 1 (and GC) which both seem to be highly overbased with calcium. And now we've got this lab trying to test an oil with a pour point somewhere south of -50°C with a testing unit that won't go below -39°C.quote:
Originally posted by Patman:
So this oil definitely does not freeze at -39, nor is it's pour point -39, it's much less.
Yes, exactly. This oil definitely has a pour point that is at a colder temperature than -39quote:
Originally posted by pscholte:
Pat, You meant "less" as in "lower" than -39ºC, right?quote:
Originally posted by Patman:
So this oil definitely does not freeze at -39, nor is it's pour point -39, it's much less.
Here is another quote from the email I was sent, which shows me that Wearcheck went the extra step to ensure they were giving me accurate readings on the additive levels:quote:
Originally posted by G-Man II:
Have you noticed how it seems these hi-tech oils are sometimes too "hi-tech" for these labs? Blackstone says they can't give accurate calcium readings when the level gets over 2000 ppm, yet we've got Mobil 1 (and GC) which both seem to be highly overbased with calcium. And now we've got this lab trying to test an oil with a pour point somewhere south of -50°C with a testing unit that won't go below -39°C.
These labs seem to be set up to test average OTC oils and when you throw something "exotic" at them, they can't handle it.
quote:
As this sample was a new oil with a high viscosity index it was sent for an ICP re-test where a higher dilution ratio is applied to the oil prior to testing. This is a standard procedure on new oils with high VI's as the higher dilution of the sample limits the negative effects the VI improvers have on sample nebulisation in the spectrometers spray chamber. This practice reduces the sensitivity of wear metal analysis but significantly improves the accuracy of additive measurements which are of more concern with new oils.
Ted,quote:
Originally posted by TooSlick:
Patman,
...I thought it was pretty impressive on paper but not particularly useful unless you lived in the Arctic.
Ted
My plan was to run this oil to a 20,000km interval (12,500 miles) in my sister's car until she decided to move to Vancouver in October. So unfortunately we'll have to let someone else go for this type of interval. I'm pretty sure I'm going to stick with 6k intervals in my own car, or at the very most 9k.quote:
The GC, 0w-30 seems to be pretty comparable to Mobil 1, based on the limited data I've seen. The real proof of the pudding would be to run some 10k-12k drain intervals and see if it holds up as well as Mobil 1 and Amsoil. Any ACEA A3/B4 rated synthetic should last for at least 10,000 miles when used in a clean running engine ....
I should have a 7500 mile run of GC in the next month or so. If it looks good I intend to try a 10K mile run. I have a 10K mile run on that engine using Mobil 1 so we should be able to get some comparison...quote:
Originally posted by Patman:
My plan was to run this oil to a 20,000km interval (12,500 miles) in my sister's car until she decided to move to Vancouver in October. So unfortunately we'll have to let someone else go for this type of interval. I'm pretty sure I'm going to stick with 6k intervals in my own car, or at the very most 9k.quote:
The GC, 0w-30 seems to be pretty comparable to Mobil 1, based on the limited data I've seen. The real proof of the pudding would be to run some 10k-12k drain intervals and see if it holds up as well as Mobil 1 and Amsoil. Any ACEA A3/B4 rated synthetic should last for at least 10,000 miles when used in a clean running engine ....