Recent Topics
Reading spark plugs. Too hot?
by italian68
07/29/14 07:46 PM
Need basement bulkhead ideas
by eljefino
07/29/14 07:38 PM
Champion Brands 5W-20 Synthetic Blend $2.46 qt
by Warstud
07/29/14 07:31 PM
Ford motorcraft Full synthetic 5 W 20
by kensley
07/29/14 07:30 PM
Mobil1 ESP 5W30, 4,350mi VW Tiguan 2.0TSI
by edyvw
07/29/14 06:27 PM
Transmission slipping
by reemoe2
07/29/14 06:27 PM
audio out from tv to phono "in" sounds bad...
by daves66nova
07/29/14 06:04 PM
New car to me, BMW E46 325i - Shell Ultra 5w-40 ?
by lobe
07/29/14 06:04 PM
d.i. turbo vs d.i. non-turbo / deposits, dilution
by wemay
07/29/14 05:31 PM
API SM, Do you miss it?
by wemay
07/29/14 05:23 PM
Drowned engine. Change oil?
by MinamiKotaro
07/29/14 05:11 PM
GM Dexos 0W-20 6,069 miles 2014 GMC Sierra 5.3
by gonefishing
07/29/14 05:05 PM
Newest Members
jjs1235, Tomas, bovk, papafordboy, mrmjmab61
50794 Registered Users
Who's Online
115 registered (AandPDan, 2010_FX4, 901Memphis, 01rangerxl, b1amgm47, asand1, 11 invisible), 1996 Guests and 230 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
50794 Members
64 Forums
217009 Topics
3416655 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3032754 - 06/13/13 09:36 PM Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Have both in my stash the xp is a napa platinum same filter as far as i know what would would say is the better or preferred filter for a 10k oci with amsoil xl as dar as efficiency, capacity and build quality.


Edited by jdmstr22 (06/13/13 09:38 PM)
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032780 - 06/13/13 09:56 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 4458
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Virtually a toss up IMO although the Fram likely has the edge in filtering efficiency since the Ultra runs 99%. Frankly 10k would probably be under utilizing either one of them.
_________________________
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0 @ 121k Pennzoil HM 10w30
Napa Silver 31515
KIA Sedona 37k, Chevy Lumina 169k, Chrysler Sebring 170k, Ford Ranger 174k!

Top
#3032812 - 06/13/13 10:41 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
HTSS_TR Offline


Registered: 04/17/06
Posts: 12900
Loc: Irvine, CA
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.
_________________________
'94 LS400
'00 E430
'04 S2000
"Consumerism has accustomed us to waste. But throwing food away is like stealing it from the poor and hungry" Pop Francis

Top
#3032892 - 06/14/13 01:07 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: HTSS_TR]
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.


I wish i could use a pure one but ive tried and i get a bad valvetrain noise with them the synthetic filters flow a little better to my understanding and i tend not to get valve tic with them.
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032935 - 06/14/13 04:39 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
dnewton3 Offline



Registered: 05/14/07
Posts: 5540
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
A total toss up; both are way more capable than the 10k miles you're going to put them through.

Construction is nearly identical; silicone ADBV, wire backed syn media, premium build with robust materials, high holding capacity, etc.

Any UOA data or PC data you could find by using either of these would be well within the "normal" deviation of typical use, and would indicate they are statistically the same. While the lab efficiency ratings (of which Wix has become quite evasive in posting recently) may favor one over the other, the real world use will not reveal any difference; they are both premium products. Any difference would only be attributed to daily variation and not performance potential.

It simply won't matter, except in your head. The engine will not be able to distinguish any difference whatsoever.

Total overkill for your intended OCI, but as BOF would say, that's the U'Mericun way ...


Edited by dnewton3 (06/14/13 04:46 AM)
_________________________
Conventionals vs. Synthetics isn't about which is "better"; it's about which lasts longer, while assuring safe operation, in relation to cost. Any product can be over or under utilized. The same applies to filters.
Make an informed decision; first consider your operating conditions, next determine your maintenance plan, and then pick your lube and filter. Don't do it the other way around ...

Top