Recent Topics
0W-40 for 223k mile 95 Mercedes E320?
by gregoron
39 minutes 35 seconds ago
I hate surprises
by Excel
50 minutes 59 seconds ago
Wix coolant filter change and cut open
by A310
Today at 03:45 AM
O2 Sensor Voltage
by Falcon_LS
Today at 01:36 AM
Electrical shock at the grocery store
by Merkava_4
Yesterday at 11:42 PM
Another should I change my oil thread
by dan_erickson
Yesterday at 10:53 PM
new HDM part number for lacrosse headlamp recall
by lucerne06
Yesterday at 08:48 PM
snapper blade control is stiff
by edwardh1
Yesterday at 08:44 PM
is my extension cord bad?
by motor_oil_madman
Yesterday at 08:33 PM
Done with Sandisk USB Sticks
by JHZR2
Yesterday at 08:20 PM
Pineapple Margaritas
by sleddriver
Yesterday at 08:12 PM
Replacing Drywall In The Bathroom (Insulation)
by Warstud
Yesterday at 07:56 PM
Newest Members
ph9, Kurt34556, Skullzaflare, Jakes_Lawn, Aarrghhh
58031 Registered Users
Who's Online
58 registered (ABomb369, 2015_PSD, aquariuscsm, AirgunSavant, AIRJAC3, A310, 4 invisible), 937 Guests and 121 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58031 Members
66 Forums
249620 Topics
4086885 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3032754 - 06/13/13 09:36 PM Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Have both in my stash the xp is a napa platinum same filter as far as i know what would would say is the better or preferred filter for a 10k oci with amsoil xl as dar as efficiency, capacity and build quality.


Edited by jdmstr22 (06/13/13 09:38 PM)
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032780 - 06/13/13 09:56 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 6296
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Virtually a toss up IMO although the Fram likely has the edge in filtering efficiency since the Ultra runs 99%. Frankly 10k would probably be under utilizing either one of them.
_________________________
2004 Jeep Grand 4.0 @ 132k Pennzoil HM 10w30 w/ 1 qt 10w40
Fram PH8A
KIA Sedona 59k, Ford Focus 115k, Chrysler Sebring 185k, Chrysler Concorde 115k

Top
#3032812 - 06/13/13 10:41 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
HTSS_TR Offline


Registered: 04/17/06
Posts: 18233
Loc: Lake Forest, CA
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.
_________________________
'00 MB E430
'04 Honda S2000
'06 Volvo V70
'14 Honda Accord LX
"Throwing food away is like stealing it from the poor and hungry" Pope Francis

Top
#3032892 - 06/14/13 01:07 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: HTSS_TR]
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.


I wish i could use a pure one but ive tried and i get a bad valvetrain noise with them the synthetic filters flow a little better to my understanding and i tend not to get valve tic with them.
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032935 - 06/14/13 04:39 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
dnewton3 Offline



Registered: 05/14/07
Posts: 6367
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
A total toss up; both are way more capable than the 10k miles you're going to put them through.

Construction is nearly identical; silicone ADBV, wire backed syn media, premium build with robust materials, high holding capacity, etc.

Any UOA data or PC data you could find by using either of these would be well within the "normal" deviation of typical use, and would indicate they are statistically the same. While the lab efficiency ratings (of which Wix has become quite evasive in posting recently) may favor one over the other, the real world use will not reveal any difference; they are both premium products. Any difference would only be attributed to daily variation and not performance potential.

It simply won't matter, except in your head. The engine will not be able to distinguish any difference whatsoever.

Total overkill for your intended OCI, but as BOF would say, that's the U'Mericun way ...


Edited by dnewton3 (06/14/13 04:46 AM)
_________________________
Conventionals vs. Synthetics isn't about which is "better"; it's about which lasts longer, while assuring safe operation, in relation to cost. Any product can be over or under utilized. The same applies to filters.
Make an informed decision; first consider your operating conditions, next determine your maintenance plan, and then pick your lube and filter. Don't do it the other way around ...

Top