Gumout Q&A

click here to participate in the Gumout Q&A

Recent Topics
150,000 miles change Timing Belt/Water Pump
by Topo
18 minutes 41 seconds ago
air purifier recommendations?
by joaks
19 minutes 24 seconds ago
CUT OPEN PZ-173 off of 2013 Taurus, unknown miles.
by car51
Today at 10:28 AM
M1 EP 0w20 or TGMO 0w20....
by gregk24
Today at 10:22 AM
(CUT OPEN) Pro Motive #3614, 4,989 miles 07' focus
by car51
Today at 10:08 AM
New Type Oil Drain Plug Gasket
by HosteenJorje
Today at 10:04 AM
Turbo on a tractor!?
by davison0976
Today at 09:58 AM
94 Cherokee 4.0L 223k mi | Penz Plat 5w30 | 5k mi
by ChuckCherokee
Today at 09:58 AM
Seafoam - Did I do damage?
by gtpimp
Today at 09:42 AM
Cordless saw
by Whitewolf
Today at 08:51 AM
Amsoil 75W/140 and TAN
by 2010_FX4
Today at 08:50 AM
SuperTech Synthetic - Best Value Oil?
by The Critic
Today at 03:44 AM
Newest Members
jdoty5252, Christophel, jmj540, NJM1965, csaig929
53628 Registered Users
Who's Online
100 registered (bbhero, 2010_FX4, -SyN-, 3for3, ag_ghost, 97f150, 9 invisible), 2297 Guests and 182 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
53628 Members
66 Forums
229926 Topics
3678992 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3032754 - 06/13/13 09:36 PM Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Have both in my stash the xp is a napa platinum same filter as far as i know what would would say is the better or preferred filter for a 10k oci with amsoil xl as dar as efficiency, capacity and build quality.


Edited by jdmstr22 (06/13/13 09:38 PM)
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032780 - 06/13/13 09:56 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 5231
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Virtually a toss up IMO although the Fram likely has the edge in filtering efficiency since the Ultra runs 99%. Frankly 10k would probably be under utilizing either one of them.
_________________________
2004 Jeep GC WJ 4.0 @ 125k Castrol 5w40 w/ MMO
Napa Silver 31516
KIA Sedona 44k, Chevy Lumina 175k, Chrysler Sebring 175k, Chrysler Concorde 102k

Top
#3032812 - 06/13/13 10:41 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
HTSS_TR Offline


Registered: 04/17/06
Posts: 14293
Loc: Lake Forest, CA
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.
_________________________
'94 Lexus LS400
'00 MB E430
'04 Honda S2000
'06 Volvo V70
"Throwing food away is like stealing it from the poor and hungry" Pope Francis

Top
#3032892 - 06/14/13 01:07 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: HTSS_TR]
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.


I wish i could use a pure one but ive tried and i get a bad valvetrain noise with them the synthetic filters flow a little better to my understanding and i tend not to get valve tic with them.
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032935 - 06/14/13 04:39 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
dnewton3 Offline



Registered: 05/14/07
Posts: 6021
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
A total toss up; both are way more capable than the 10k miles you're going to put them through.

Construction is nearly identical; silicone ADBV, wire backed syn media, premium build with robust materials, high holding capacity, etc.

Any UOA data or PC data you could find by using either of these would be well within the "normal" deviation of typical use, and would indicate they are statistically the same. While the lab efficiency ratings (of which Wix has become quite evasive in posting recently) may favor one over the other, the real world use will not reveal any difference; they are both premium products. Any difference would only be attributed to daily variation and not performance potential.

It simply won't matter, except in your head. The engine will not be able to distinguish any difference whatsoever.

Total overkill for your intended OCI, but as BOF would say, that's the U'Mericun way ...


Edited by dnewton3 (06/14/13 04:46 AM)
_________________________
Conventionals vs. Synthetics isn't about which is "better"; it's about which lasts longer, while assuring safe operation, in relation to cost. Any product can be over or under utilized. The same applies to filters.
Make an informed decision; first consider your operating conditions, next determine your maintenance plan, and then pick your lube and filter. Don't do it the other way around ...

Top