Recent Topics
Nomenclature
by mjoekingz28
Today at 03:02 AM
Castrol Import Multi Vehicle for Toyota WS
by Spartuss
Today at 01:30 AM
corrosion X
by Skanky
Today at 12:04 AM
Identify the Location
by hotwheels
Yesterday at 11:11 PM
Menards now carrying Bosch, AC Delco, MC, Mopar...
by mrsilv04
Yesterday at 10:35 PM
drive through take out....
by mattwithcats
Yesterday at 10:23 PM
amsoil ATM 10w30; 4 UOA; 2010 v6 explorer
by pb
Yesterday at 10:16 PM
Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring
by 01_celica_gt
Yesterday at 10:16 PM
Loose.or sagging door
by mjoekingz28
Yesterday at 09:38 PM
I Cut Open Three Random Purolators Today
by crazyoildude
Yesterday at 09:35 PM
Question about car sales tax and moving
by FirstNissan
Yesterday at 08:31 PM
Not sure what OBD
by 3800Series
Yesterday at 08:16 PM
Newest Members
briand069, koffy, 90South, mkm492, Sarah_blanco_007
52600 Registered Users
Who's Online
29 registered (Char Baby, Datarock, Abakev, Clevy, 1345, 3 invisible), 483 Guests and 170 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
52600 Members
66 Forums
225514 Topics
3587393 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3032754 - 06/13/13 09:36 PM Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Have both in my stash the xp is a napa platinum same filter as far as i know what would would say is the better or preferred filter for a 10k oci with amsoil xl as dar as efficiency, capacity and build quality.


Edited by jdmstr22 (06/13/13 09:38 PM)
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032780 - 06/13/13 09:56 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 4930
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Virtually a toss up IMO although the Fram likely has the edge in filtering efficiency since the Ultra runs 99%. Frankly 10k would probably be under utilizing either one of them.
_________________________
2004 Jeep GC WJ 4.0 @ 124k Pennzoil YB 5w30 - MoS2
Napa Silver 31516
KIA Sedona 42k, Chevy Lumina 175k, Chrysler Sebring 174k, Chrysler Concorde 100k

Top
#3032812 - 06/13/13 10:41 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
HTSS_TR Online   content


Registered: 04/17/06
Posts: 13485
Loc: Irvine, CA
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.
_________________________
'94 LS400
'00 E430
'04 S2000
"Consumerism has accustomed us to waste. But throwing food away is like stealing it from the poor and hungry" Pop Francis

Top
#3032892 - 06/14/13 01:07 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: HTSS_TR]
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.


I wish i could use a pure one but ive tried and i get a bad valvetrain noise with them the synthetic filters flow a little better to my understanding and i tend not to get valve tic with them.
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032935 - 06/14/13 04:39 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
dnewton3 Offline



Registered: 05/14/07
Posts: 5834
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
A total toss up; both are way more capable than the 10k miles you're going to put them through.

Construction is nearly identical; silicone ADBV, wire backed syn media, premium build with robust materials, high holding capacity, etc.

Any UOA data or PC data you could find by using either of these would be well within the "normal" deviation of typical use, and would indicate they are statistically the same. While the lab efficiency ratings (of which Wix has become quite evasive in posting recently) may favor one over the other, the real world use will not reveal any difference; they are both premium products. Any difference would only be attributed to daily variation and not performance potential.

It simply won't matter, except in your head. The engine will not be able to distinguish any difference whatsoever.

Total overkill for your intended OCI, but as BOF would say, that's the U'Mericun way ...


Edited by dnewton3 (06/14/13 04:46 AM)
_________________________
Conventionals vs. Synthetics isn't about which is "better"; it's about which lasts longer, while assuring safe operation, in relation to cost. Any product can be over or under utilized. The same applies to filters.
Make an informed decision; first consider your operating conditions, next determine your maintenance plan, and then pick your lube and filter. Don't do it the other way around ...

Top