Originally Posted By: Indydriver
Regarding the Honda oil, I bought it right after the car in Spring of 2011, so price-wise it wasn't so bad then. I had read about a bunch of problems with the VCM V6 and in fact, Honda had a tech bulletin for 2008-2010 IIRC. They stated publicly that they had upgraded oil control rings and impregnated piston skirts with moly for the '11 MY. I believe this was when they demanded that dealers and customers leave the FF in for the distance. This all seemed to be in reaction to the mounting VCM issues. It was clear to me that Honda engineers were more concerned about a longer term moly exposure than they were about metal residue in motor oil.
Given the above, I decided I didn't mind spending a couple of extra bucks to do everything exactly as recommended with all OE products. However, this fill of Honda genuine is all I have so I will be switching to either PP or TGMO both of which I have in plentiful supply. I'm leaning toward the SM TGMO to give the engine another moly boost.
Interestingly (to me anyway) is we've purchased a new Toyota Sienna V6 since then and it calls for 10,000 mile OCIs right out of the box without so much as an OLM. Since Toyota includes 2 oil changes with TGMO 0W-20 in the purchase price, I won't be able to do a UOA on that engine until 30,000.
So, the manufacturers are pushing us into extended OCIs whether we like it or not. One would tend to assume with their R&D budgets that they know what they're doing BUT, they haven't always been perfect in the past, have they?
I can't argue with trying to stay compliant with warranty constraints; makes too much sense and the risk typically isn't worth the reward to go off the reservation.
As for the longer OCIs, it's the trend. And there is a fair amount of data to show that, at least in many applications, it's a safe thing to do. Every engine will be somewhat "unique" in the response to such endeavors, though.