Recent Topics
Cheap No Contract phone wanted... Sick of it.
by JGmazda
Today at 02:52 AM
1994 Volvo 945 / Q8 T1000D Dino 10w30 @8000 Km
by miniac007
Today at 02:32 AM
What are your favorite detailing products?
by The Critic
Today at 02:27 AM
Oil Filter Autopsy Question
by Nyogtha
Today at 12:58 AM
Napa Gold (Wix) Oil Filters Threads Machined Badly
by crazyoildude
Today at 12:44 AM
Need oil for car with oil control ring issues
by Oro_O
Yesterday at 11:34 PM
AMSOIL Oil Filter Demonstrator
by CELICA_XX
Yesterday at 11:31 PM
being a dealer tech
by ram_man
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Mobil 1 X1 ESP 0W30
by spiderbypass
Yesterday at 10:27 PM
Mazda Miata ridiculous oil change interval
by Baveux
Yesterday at 09:48 PM
2 piece engine block on Ford's new 2.7 EcoBoost V6
by gonefishing
Yesterday at 09:47 PM
Sears Die Hard Platinum
by StevenR
Yesterday at 09:35 PM
Newest Members
ArtGarcia, 12e, AnonyBliss, Rits, BMEP
51659 Registered Users
Who's Online
27 registered (147_Grain, Bookmaker, Char Baby, ChiaroBlue, 01_celica_gt, Biggun, 2 invisible), 579 Guests and 167 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51659 Members
64 Forums
221042 Topics
3493764 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#2703075 - 08/02/12 04:46 PM Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN
tstep Offline


Registered: 08/06/11
Posts: 334
Loc: PA
With all the emphasis for resource conserving (understood that 10w-40 is not exactly resource conserving), why would SOPUS 10w-40 class oils get thicker when transition from SM to SN? Was SM perhaps too light w/ observable consequences being reported? Were the SL oils as light as SM, but with higher levels of plating additives? Are the SN formulations are nearly in the 15w-40 range to compensate for lower levels plating metals relying more on film thickness? Couple of comparisons below:

PYB SM ..............PYB SN
KV40 = 96.9 .........KV40 = 104.7
KV100 = 14.0 ........KV100 = 15.5
HTHS = 3.7 ..........HTHS = 3.8
Pour Point = -30 ....Pour Point = -42

Shell Formula has a similar viscosity increase in the 10% range along with the same 10-15 degree lowering of the pour point. Values are nearly identical to PYB. Quaker State however, looks as though they did not change the formuation from SM to SN.

Top
#2703109 - 08/02/12 05:26 PM Re: Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN [Re: tstep]
JRed Offline


Registered: 06/01/09
Posts: 1633
Loc: Virginia
It's probably due to the use of higher quality base stocks to meet the requirements of API SN.
_________________________
06 Subaru Impreza WRX - Sold. The only mechanical thing I'll ever love.
07 Toyota Prius - Cheap synthetic and PureOne filters.

Top
#2703111 - 08/02/12 05:28 PM Re: Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN [Re: tstep]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7220
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
HTHS is about the same but pour point is improved. It is not that much "thicker" at operating temperature this looks improved overall to me.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2703119 - 08/02/12 05:35 PM Re: Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN [Re: tstep]
tstep Offline


Registered: 08/06/11
Posts: 334
Loc: PA
I thought maybe the pour point would be an indicator of a better base. Just seems odd to have a 10% increase in KV and also odd to have Shell follow suit (unless it is the same oil repackaged) when the market trend is toward thinner oils.

But as stated, the HTHS is very similar.


Edited by tstep (08/02/12 05:36 PM)

Top
#2703125 - 08/02/12 05:42 PM Re: Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN [Re: tstep]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7220
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
It makes since because of the oils are provided by Shell.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2703357 - 08/02/12 09:31 PM Re: Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN [Re: tstep]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11606
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Where did you find this data sheet? When I look here, I find substantially different numbers for the SN, in line with what you posted for the SM numbers.

Perhaps you have a newer sheet than I do. The SN sheet I linked above is dated November of 2010.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#2703358 - 08/02/12 09:36 PM Re: Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN [Re: Garak]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7220
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
Originally Posted By: Garak
Where did you find this data sheet? When I look here, I find substantially different numbers for the SN, in line with what you posted for the SM numbers.

Perhaps you have a newer sheet than I do. The SN sheet I linked above is dated November of 2010.


http://www.epc.shell.com/Docs/GPCDOC_X_cbe_24855_key_140007054913_201202271120.pdf
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2703569 - 08/03/12 05:31 AM Re: Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN [Re: dave1251]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11606
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Thanks for the link. That's definitely a newer sheet than the one I was looking at. The one I was looking at was probably an "edit" where they just changed SM/GF-4 references to SN/GF-5 and left everything else alone. wink

Now, to see if I can find it myself on the Shell site without digging up something ancient again....

Bingo. If I want to find it, I have to set my country to the U.S. If I set it to Canada, I have the choice of SM/GF-4 Pennzoil or the old SN/GF-5 sheet (the one I referenced). If I choose the U.S., I get the old SM/GF-4 sheet or the one you showed me.

It might aid people if they put a reference date in the columns for these products, especially if they're keeping out of date spec sheets online. There are valid reasons for keeping old sheets out there, but it would be nice if there were a way to more easily filter them.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#2703638 - 08/03/12 07:51 AM Re: Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN [Re: tstep]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 12539
Loc: Chicago, IL
Shell is not consistent with updating spec sheets. This is a bit of a turn off as I look for my next oil to try...
_________________________
2011.5 BMW M3 saloon ZCP
der stärkste buchstabe der welt
Castrol Edge Professional TWS 10w60 + Mahle OX 254D3

Top
#2704134 - 08/03/12 05:32 PM Re: Shell Formula & PYB 10w-40 SM vs SN [Re: dparm]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11606
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Agreed. It's not bad for me, who just needs something SM/GF-4 or better in a 5w-30. Anyone needing European specifications, like yourself, has a chore on his hands.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top