Recent Topics
Fear Getting Towed? Youíll Hate Watching This
by Falcon_LS
17 minutes 48 seconds ago
Replacing parts before they fail
by Falcon_LS
49 minutes 17 seconds ago
First Impressions: Cooper Discoverer H/T
by Falcon_LS
Today at 03:31 PM
Torn between tool brands
by renegade_987
Today at 12:34 PM
the beggars are really out in force today.
by Chris142
Today at 11:56 AM
New F150 specs
by hattaresguy
Today at 11:47 AM
WTB: 99 Miata roll bar
by Klutch9
Today at 10:56 AM
PP 5W30 Vs Total Quartz Ineo MC3 5W30
by Thugzy
Today at 10:11 AM
Let's talk about stolen cars
by MalfunctionProne
Today at 09:42 AM
Very Tempted but Sailun Tires
by rjundi
Today at 09:38 AM
Spicing up my chili
by racer12306
Today at 09:13 AM
AAP $50 off $100+ first 2000 customers.
by sayjac
Today at 09:05 AM
Newest Members
EdBurns, wolf9832, marine65, Focality, zimmersci
52011 Registered Users
Who's Online
78 registered (2010_FX4, Atlantis, aa1986, 2KBMW, Bandito440, 3800Series, 7 invisible), 1112 Guests and 192 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
52011 Members
66 Forums
222684 Topics
3525376 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#2629126 - 05/17/12 12:13 PM Chrysler MS-6395
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29218
Loc: NJ
Quote:
Question:
Mobil 1 5W-20 and Chrysler MS-6395
Why is your Mobil 1 5W-20 not Chrysler MS-6395 spec approved? Or if it is, why is the certification not on the bottle or website?
-- Josh Eads, Cabot, AR
Answer:
Chryslerís latest revision to the MS-6395 specification calls for a field trial spanning multiple seasons over two years. While we fully expect the exceptional performance of Mobil 1 synthetic motor oil to meet Chryslerís specification requirements, at this time we are in the process of evaluating our timeline to start this testing.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629134 - 05/17/12 12:18 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7340
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
But buster I have read pretty much every major conventional oil blender state that their oil meet this spec.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2629141 - 05/17/12 12:24 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29218
Loc: NJ
Yeah I'm sure many do. I was more interested in the fact that it's a field trial over two years.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629153 - 05/17/12 12:34 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
SteveHarper Offline


Registered: 05/10/12
Posts: 35
Loc: Minneapolis
If a manufacturer can revise a specification but keep the same number, how can we possibly know which bottles meet the specification?

They should use a new number for the specification.

Top
#2629200 - 05/17/12 01:18 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 3442
Loc: USA
Sounds like Chrysler wants a 2 year monopoly.IF nobody can certify for 2 years,that means Mopar oil will be the only approved choice.

Top
#2629202 - 05/17/12 01:20 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29218
Loc: NJ
LOL!!!
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629203 - 05/17/12 01:21 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29218
Loc: NJ
Kudos to Mobil though for not saying it meets it when it hasn't been tested.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629215 - 05/17/12 01:35 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: SteveHarper]
NHHEMI Offline


Registered: 07/06/07
Posts: 5158
Loc: NH
Originally Posted By: SteveHarper
If a manufacturer can revise a specification but keep the same number, how can we possibly know which bottles meet the specification?

They should use a new number for the specification.


Chrysler MS-6395 actually has a letter at the end designating what version it is. Last one I knew of was MS-6395-N.

The funny part is Chrysler doesn't always tell you what version you should be running in the owner's manual. Sometimes you get the full spec designation and other times they will just say use MS-6395.
_________________________
Royal Purple User Since 1990 thumbsup

2014 Jeep Cherokee
"Latitude"
3.2L V6 4WD( ADI )


Top
#2629225 - 05/17/12 01:41 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: NHHEMI]
Ursae_Majoris Offline


Registered: 03/28/09
Posts: 1350
Loc: South
My TC says MS-6395. All oils I looked at had MS-6395 (Valvoline and QS), and no letters.
_________________________
2011 Chrysler T&C, Dealer bulk fill/, OEM filter
2002 Isuzu Axiom, PureOne, 5w-30 G-Oil

Top
#2629228 - 05/17/12 01:43 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7340
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
So then how can other blenders state their 5W-20, 5W-30, and 10W-30 meets the spec including MOPAR oil that is just re-badged PYB? Did Mobil and BP drop the ball on the certification because I found that SOPUS products and Valvoline state that their oils meet the cert but XOM and BP oils do not the question that you posted leads to more questions.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2629232 - 05/17/12 01:48 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29218
Loc: NJ
No idea.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629233 - 05/17/12 01:50 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: SteveHarper]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 21560
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: SteveHarper
If a manufacturer can revise a specification but keep the same number, how can we possibly know which bottles meet the specification?

They should use a new number for the specification.


Exactly. This just sounds like Chrysler is trying to extort some $$ from XOM. LOL
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops


Top
#2629729 - 05/18/12 04:51 AM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: Ursae_Majoris]
NHHEMI Offline


Registered: 07/06/07
Posts: 5158
Loc: NH
Originally Posted By: Ursae_Majoris
My TC says MS-6395. All oils I looked at had MS-6395 (Valvoline and QS), and no letters.


Do a search for MS6395M or N. I have even see Q come up in a search.
_________________________
Royal Purple User Since 1990 thumbsup

2014 Jeep Cherokee
"Latitude"
3.2L V6 4WD( ADI )


Top
#2629979 - 05/18/12 10:55 AM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: NHHEMI]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7340
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
I have seen MS-6395-S on quaker state's website.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2841301 - 12/19/12 08:21 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
10cent Offline


Registered: 12/25/06
Posts: 64
Loc: Raleigh NC
Since we seem to have a fair amount of Chrysler product owners on the site I want to bump this to note that Mobil Super now carries the Chrysler MS-6395 approval per the PDS dated 8/12.

http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lubes/PDS/GLXXENINDMOMobil_Super.aspx
_________________________
2005 BMW 645
Mobil 1 0w40 & Mann filter

2009 Grand Cherokee 4.7 QD-II
Maxlife Full-Syn & Wix filter

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >