Recent Topics
Fram Ultra low prices at Rockauto $6.76
by 901Memphis
11 minutes 57 seconds ago
mobil 1 vs castrol synthetic gear oil????????
by whitearrow
17 minutes 5 seconds ago
5.7L Hemi Ram 1500 rod knock when cold
by butcherman
18 minutes 43 seconds ago
Turbo 350 - DexIII or VI
by GSCJR
59 minutes 9 seconds ago
94 Jaguar XJS 6.0 V12, 1400 mi, Unknown xW-30
by Wampahoofus
Today at 08:43 PM
Snow vs ice tire
by supton
Today at 08:35 PM
Formula Shell Full Synthetic from BJ's
by tojo1968
Today at 08:17 PM
PQIA 5w30 VOAs - Kangaroo, Hess, Murphy USA & 7-11
by 901Memphis
Today at 07:43 PM
Warranty Facts
by BrianC
Today at 07:32 PM
2010 Honda Pilot, 3.5, 30k on engine, 5,4k on QSUD
by p1zippie
Today at 06:32 PM
THE BABY SKUNK
by Charlie1935
Today at 06:04 PM
Affixing brackets to fiberglass
by Apollo14
Today at 05:17 PM
Newest Members
Hox, massbrad, jtrix, SR1919, bigdaveyl
51684 Registered Users
Who's Online
86 registered (aquariuscsm, agpilot77, 901Memphis, 123Saab, 8 invisible), 1432 Guests and 195 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51684 Members
64 Forums
221167 Topics
3496741 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#2629126 - 05/17/12 12:13 PM Chrysler MS-6395
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29201
Loc: NJ
Quote:
Question:
Mobil 1 5W-20 and Chrysler MS-6395
Why is your Mobil 1 5W-20 not Chrysler MS-6395 spec approved? Or if it is, why is the certification not on the bottle or website?
-- Josh Eads, Cabot, AR
Answer:
Chryslerís latest revision to the MS-6395 specification calls for a field trial spanning multiple seasons over two years. While we fully expect the exceptional performance of Mobil 1 synthetic motor oil to meet Chryslerís specification requirements, at this time we are in the process of evaluating our timeline to start this testing.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629134 - 05/17/12 12:18 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7231
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
But buster I have read pretty much every major conventional oil blender state that their oil meet this spec.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2629141 - 05/17/12 12:24 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29201
Loc: NJ
Yeah I'm sure many do. I was more interested in the fact that it's a field trial over two years.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629153 - 05/17/12 12:34 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
SteveHarper Offline


Registered: 05/10/12
Posts: 35
Loc: Minneapolis
If a manufacturer can revise a specification but keep the same number, how can we possibly know which bottles meet the specification?

They should use a new number for the specification.

Top
#2629200 - 05/17/12 01:18 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 3379
Loc: USA
Sounds like Chrysler wants a 2 year monopoly.IF nobody can certify for 2 years,that means Mopar oil will be the only approved choice.

Top
#2629202 - 05/17/12 01:20 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29201
Loc: NJ
LOL!!!
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629203 - 05/17/12 01:21 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29201
Loc: NJ
Kudos to Mobil though for not saying it meets it when it hasn't been tested.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629215 - 05/17/12 01:35 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: SteveHarper]
NHHEMI Offline


Registered: 07/06/07
Posts: 5136
Loc: NH
Originally Posted By: SteveHarper
If a manufacturer can revise a specification but keep the same number, how can we possibly know which bottles meet the specification?

They should use a new number for the specification.


Chrysler MS-6395 actually has a letter at the end designating what version it is. Last one I knew of was MS-6395-N.

The funny part is Chrysler doesn't always tell you what version you should be running in the owner's manual. Sometimes you get the full spec designation and other times they will just say use MS-6395.
_________________________
Royal Purple User Since 1990 thumbsup

2014 Jeep Cherokee
"Latitude"
3.2L V6 4WD( ADI )


Top
#2629225 - 05/17/12 01:41 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: NHHEMI]
Ursae_Majoris Offline


Registered: 03/28/09
Posts: 1350
Loc: South
My TC says MS-6395. All oils I looked at had MS-6395 (Valvoline and QS), and no letters.
_________________________
2011 Chrysler T&C, Dealer bulk fill/, OEM filter
2002 Isuzu Axiom, PureOne, 5w-30 G-Oil

Top
#2629228 - 05/17/12 01:43 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7231
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
So then how can other blenders state their 5W-20, 5W-30, and 10W-30 meets the spec including MOPAR oil that is just re-badged PYB? Did Mobil and BP drop the ball on the certification because I found that SOPUS products and Valvoline state that their oils meet the cert but XOM and BP oils do not the question that you posted leads to more questions.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2629232 - 05/17/12 01:48 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29201
Loc: NJ
No idea.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629233 - 05/17/12 01:50 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: SteveHarper]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 21332
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: SteveHarper
If a manufacturer can revise a specification but keep the same number, how can we possibly know which bottles meet the specification?

They should use a new number for the specification.


Exactly. This just sounds like Chrysler is trying to extort some $$ from XOM. LOL
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops


Top
#2629729 - 05/18/12 04:51 AM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: Ursae_Majoris]
NHHEMI Offline


Registered: 07/06/07
Posts: 5136
Loc: NH
Originally Posted By: Ursae_Majoris
My TC says MS-6395. All oils I looked at had MS-6395 (Valvoline and QS), and no letters.


Do a search for MS6395M or N. I have even see Q come up in a search.
_________________________
Royal Purple User Since 1990 thumbsup

2014 Jeep Cherokee
"Latitude"
3.2L V6 4WD( ADI )


Top
#2629979 - 05/18/12 10:55 AM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: NHHEMI]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7231
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
I have seen MS-6395-S on quaker state's website.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2841301 - 12/19/12 08:21 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
10cent Offline


Registered: 12/25/06
Posts: 64
Loc: Raleigh NC
Since we seem to have a fair amount of Chrysler product owners on the site I want to bump this to note that Mobil Super now carries the Chrysler MS-6395 approval per the PDS dated 8/12.

http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lubes/PDS/GLXXENINDMOMobil_Super.aspx
_________________________
2005 BMW 645
Mobil 1 0w40 & Mann filter

2009 Grand Cherokee 4.7 QD-II
Maxlife Full-Syn & Wix filter

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >