Recent Topics
2010 Jeep Commander
by HWEaton
Yesterday at 10:00 PM
General Altimax Arctics
by HWEaton
Yesterday at 09:40 PM
New Nitto Terra Grappler G2
by HWEaton
Yesterday at 09:33 PM
What is it with...
by Pop_Rivit
Yesterday at 09:26 PM
How important are filtering efficiency specs?
by Noey
Yesterday at 09:15 PM
WM: Tuff-Stuff cleaner $3/can (nt)
by sleddriver
Yesterday at 08:15 PM
Napa Gold Or Wix Filters?
by crazyoildude
Yesterday at 07:55 PM
2013 Mazda 3 SkyActiv, M1 AFE 0w-20, 12,832 miles
by The Critic
Yesterday at 07:50 PM
How To Professionally Detail A Vehicle
by Warstud
Yesterday at 07:49 PM
before and after (hood pics)
by ram_man
Yesterday at 07:44 PM
Marathon Gas, fuel quality
by wemay
Yesterday at 07:11 PM
05 Silverado 5.3 UOA
by Wills05
Yesterday at 07:03 PM
Newest Members
rmp, PAssatGuy, mcn1970, KCChemist, bbuice
51461 Registered Users
Who's Online
32 registered (Apollo14, CATERHAM, 147_Grain, bsigg, carmine_ricca, 5 invisible), 761 Guests and 153 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51461 Members
64 Forums
220101 Topics
3475855 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#2629126 - 05/17/12 12:13 PM Chrysler MS-6395
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29158
Loc: NJ
Quote:
Question:
Mobil 1 5W-20 and Chrysler MS-6395
Why is your Mobil 1 5W-20 not Chrysler MS-6395 spec approved? Or if it is, why is the certification not on the bottle or website?
-- Josh Eads, Cabot, AR
Answer:
Chryslerís latest revision to the MS-6395 specification calls for a field trial spanning multiple seasons over two years. While we fully expect the exceptional performance of Mobil 1 synthetic motor oil to meet Chryslerís specification requirements, at this time we are in the process of evaluating our timeline to start this testing.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629134 - 05/17/12 12:18 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
Happy Birthday dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7166
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
But buster I have read pretty much every major conventional oil blender state that their oil meet this spec.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2629141 - 05/17/12 12:24 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29158
Loc: NJ
Yeah I'm sure many do. I was more interested in the fact that it's a field trial over two years.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629153 - 05/17/12 12:34 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
SteveHarper Offline


Registered: 05/10/12
Posts: 35
Loc: Minneapolis
If a manufacturer can revise a specification but keep the same number, how can we possibly know which bottles meet the specification?

They should use a new number for the specification.

Top
#2629200 - 05/17/12 01:18 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 3342
Loc: USA
Sounds like Chrysler wants a 2 year monopoly.IF nobody can certify for 2 years,that means Mopar oil will be the only approved choice.

Top
#2629202 - 05/17/12 01:20 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29158
Loc: NJ
LOL!!!
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629203 - 05/17/12 01:21 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29158
Loc: NJ
Kudos to Mobil though for not saying it meets it when it hasn't been tested.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629215 - 05/17/12 01:35 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: SteveHarper]
NHHEMI Offline


Registered: 07/06/07
Posts: 5130
Loc: NH
Originally Posted By: SteveHarper
If a manufacturer can revise a specification but keep the same number, how can we possibly know which bottles meet the specification?

They should use a new number for the specification.


Chrysler MS-6395 actually has a letter at the end designating what version it is. Last one I knew of was MS-6395-N.

The funny part is Chrysler doesn't always tell you what version you should be running in the owner's manual. Sometimes you get the full spec designation and other times they will just say use MS-6395.
_________________________
Royal Purple User Since 1990 thumbsup

2014 Jeep Cherokee
"Latitude"
3.2L V6 4WD( ADI )


Top
#2629225 - 05/17/12 01:41 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: NHHEMI]
Ursae_Majoris Offline


Registered: 03/28/09
Posts: 1350
Loc: South
My TC says MS-6395. All oils I looked at had MS-6395 (Valvoline and QS), and no letters.
_________________________
2011 Chrysler T&C, Dealer bulk fill/, OEM filter
2002 Isuzu Axiom, PureOne, 5w-30 G-Oil

Top
#2629228 - 05/17/12 01:43 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
Happy Birthday dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7166
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
So then how can other blenders state their 5W-20, 5W-30, and 10W-30 meets the spec including MOPAR oil that is just re-badged PYB? Did Mobil and BP drop the ball on the certification because I found that SOPUS products and Valvoline state that their oils meet the cert but XOM and BP oils do not the question that you posted leads to more questions.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2629232 - 05/17/12 01:48 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29158
Loc: NJ
No idea.
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#2629233 - 05/17/12 01:50 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: SteveHarper]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 21177
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: SteveHarper
If a manufacturer can revise a specification but keep the same number, how can we possibly know which bottles meet the specification?

They should use a new number for the specification.


Exactly. This just sounds like Chrysler is trying to extort some $$ from XOM. LOL
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops


Top
#2629729 - 05/18/12 04:51 AM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: Ursae_Majoris]
NHHEMI Offline


Registered: 07/06/07
Posts: 5130
Loc: NH
Originally Posted By: Ursae_Majoris
My TC says MS-6395. All oils I looked at had MS-6395 (Valvoline and QS), and no letters.


Do a search for MS6395M or N. I have even see Q come up in a search.
_________________________
Royal Purple User Since 1990 thumbsup

2014 Jeep Cherokee
"Latitude"
3.2L V6 4WD( ADI )


Top
#2629979 - 05/18/12 10:55 AM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: NHHEMI]
Happy Birthday dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 7166
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
I have seen MS-6395-S on quaker state's website.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#2841301 - 12/19/12 08:21 PM Re: Chrysler MS-6395 [Re: buster]
10cent Offline


Registered: 12/25/06
Posts: 64
Loc: Raleigh NC
Since we seem to have a fair amount of Chrysler product owners on the site I want to bump this to note that Mobil Super now carries the Chrysler MS-6395 approval per the PDS dated 8/12.

http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lubes/PDS/GLXXENINDMOMobil_Super.aspx
_________________________
2005 BMW 645
Mobil 1 0w40 & Mann filter

2009 Grand Cherokee 4.7 QD-II
Maxlife Full-Syn & Wix filter

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >