Recent Topics
Center Caps for Older Prime Wheels
by PurpleT
33 minutes 21 seconds ago
10w30 vs 15w40 first impressions
by Luciano
33 minutes 55 seconds ago
Mobil 3309 and its equivalents
by Bandito440
39 minutes 58 seconds ago
I have started letting the car idle again
by Miller88
41 minutes 58 seconds ago
Harley-Davidson questions
by mjoekingz28
Today at 07:53 AM
Hypothetical question about engine oil
by horse123
Today at 07:52 AM
Are we really driving well??
by CourierDriver
Today at 07:29 AM
Taxes - Recommendations for Online Filing
by niero
Today at 07:29 AM
crazy long OCI would you do it......?
by yaris0128
Today at 07:29 AM
Copy dvd as a backup
by FirstNissan
Today at 07:22 AM
2015 3 Starting issue
by buster
Today at 07:14 AM
Secret Car photos
by Shannow
Today at 02:48 AM
Newest Members
ricoinusa, Pr0j3ct_x, eajseo, EuroGS, christoff
52968 Registered Users
Who's Online
109 registered (92saturnsl2, Astro14, 388llv, Al, ARCOgraphite, 8 invisible), 1386 Guests and 200 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
52968 Members
66 Forums
227269 Topics
3624414 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#2543552 - 02/21/12 08:21 AM U.S. oil production
hillclimber Offline


Registered: 10/01/06
Posts: 425
Loc: Houston
http://www.chron.com/business/article/U-S-oil-gusher-blows-out-projections-3341919.php

among other interesting tidbits: Including those in natural gas fields, the United States now has more rigs at work than the entire rest of the world.
_________________________
2009 BMW 128i

Top
#2543614 - 02/21/12 09:59 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
wallyuwl Offline


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 1470
Loc: Lexington, KY
And think about how much more we could produce now and in the future if more of Alaska, and coastal waters, were opened up. And without the deep water embargo after the BP spill.

Top
#2543673 - 02/21/12 11:15 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: wallyuwl]
Doog Online   content


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 3818
Loc: Ohio
Originally Posted By: wallyuwl
And think about how much more we could produce now and in the future if more of Alaska, and coastal waters, were opened up. And without the deep water embargo after the BP spill.


+1 or a pipeline from Canada which has somehow disappeared...
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#2543695 - 02/21/12 11:34 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Doog]
wallyuwl Offline


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 1470
Loc: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted By: Doog
Originally Posted By: wallyuwl
And think about how much more we could produce now and in the future if more of Alaska, and coastal waters, were opened up. And without the deep water embargo after the BP spill.


+1 or a pipeline from Canada which has somehow disappeared...


It will reappear........... In Vancouver. In four years. Like magic.

Top
#2544515 - 02/21/12 11:30 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: wallyuwl]
fsskier Offline


Registered: 07/22/08
Posts: 795
Loc: Iowa
Long article in the Omaha, Nebraska newspaper quoted the Governor as saying: this would have been resolved if congress had stayed out of it. The pipeline builder had agreed to correct the design and route issues..... then congress tried to make a political football out of it and force it down our throats......so the pipeline interests held off to see what happened. With the rejection now complete, they are rapidly making corrections and it seems construction is likely to begin in a year.

It will NOT go west through the Canadian mountains.... opposition is intense there.

Top
#2611430 - 04/27/12 02:50 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
Al Online   content


Registered: 06/08/02
Posts: 13927
Loc: Elizabethtown, Pa
Pumping more is not the answer..we already gobble up 25% of the world's energy with only 5% of people. People that want us to pump more, use more, and hammer Speculators are missing the point.

Top
#2611525 - 04/27/12 05:03 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Al]
Tempest Offline


Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 10468
Loc: Las Vegas NV
Originally Posted By: Al
Pumping more is not the answer..we already gobble up 25% of the world's energy with only 5% of people. People that want us to pump more, use more, and hammer Speculators are missing the point.

Then what is the point? Use less energy in the name of global fairness?
_________________________
“Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.” --- Henry Rosovsky

Top
#2611604 - 04/27/12 06:50 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
Shannow Offline


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 27999
Loc: a prisoner island
I'm starting to agree with Tempest on oil...

Use it all up now, and get back to horse and buggies.

Top
#2611654 - 04/27/12 07:31 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
addyguy Offline


Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 13483
Loc: Canada
Excdept with how large and spead-out modern society is, horse and buggy would NOT work.

When the world runs out of readily-accesible oil, you will start to see a massive drop in world population, due to starvation.

You cannot produce and transport the amount of food needed to feed the world today without petroleum power....you simply can't.
_________________________
2003 Mazda Tribute LX V-6, 179k miles.
Castrol Edge SPT 0W-20; Fram EG2.

Top
#2611777 - 04/27/12 09:26 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
Shannow Offline


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 27999
Loc: a prisoner island
Precisely
Which is why we may as well get it over with
_________________________
2003 Nissan ZD30 TD, 4L Penrite R 5W30, 3L M1 5W50, Nulon 5W20
1997 Caprice, L67, Castrol Magnatec SP 5W40 A3/B4
B&S Quantum, Chief 10W30 semi.



Top
#2611885 - 04/28/12 12:15 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Al]
tgferg67 Offline


Registered: 03/23/05
Posts: 198
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: Al
Pumping more is not the answer..we already gobble up 25% of the world's energy with only 5% of people. People that want us to pump more, use more, and hammer Speculators are missing the point.


And alot of the worlds population produce nothing other than babies and live in mud huts.
_________________________
2003 Pontiac Vibe (1ZZ-FE auto) 195k
Pennzoil dino

Top
#2612040 - 04/28/12 09:01 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Tempest]
Al Online   content


Registered: 06/08/02
Posts: 13927
Loc: Elizabethtown, Pa
Originally Posted By: Tempest
Originally Posted By: Al
Pumping more is not the answer..we already gobble up 25% of the world's energy with only 5% of people. People that want us to pump more, use more, and hammer Speculators are missing the point.

Then what is the point? Use less energy in the name of global fairness?
Not really about Global Fairness" its about common sense. There is no way our [censored] of energy is sustainable. Look at where our unsustainable debt and our lack of any type of common sense policy that makes this Country a sustainable entity going forward.


Much of the world's developing economies (that actually produce things) will be competing for energy and be able to afford more while we can afford less. But I digress. We will keep gobbling til there is nothing to gobble.


Edited by Al (04/28/12 09:02 AM)

Top
#2614333 - 04/30/12 10:04 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 15046
Loc: Iowegia
Quote:
Look at where our unsustainable debt


And who created that debt and reduced this country's oil supply in the name of forcing consumption of alternative energies NOT developed or cost effective?
_________________________
If anyone needs me, I'll be in July! smile

Top
#2614338 - 04/30/12 10:08 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Al]
JHZR2 Offline



Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 35014
Loc: New Jersey
Originally Posted By: Al
We will keep gobbling til there is nothing to gobble.


People will take a dump in their drinking water supply if it is convenient. The most convenient thing is to do nothing and pump more.

The issue is that if one entity does it unilaterally, it hurts, because there are ten others willing to just do what is convenient and cheapest. Im not talking from a central planning point of view or anything, but rather from a worldwide usage point of view.

Top
#2614793 - 05/01/12 12:23 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: addyguy]
Tempest Offline


Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 10468
Loc: Las Vegas NV
Originally Posted By: addyguy
Excdept with how large and spead-out modern society is, horse and buggy would NOT work.

When the world runs out of readily-accesible oil, you will start to see a massive drop in world population, due to starvation.

You cannot produce and transport the amount of food needed to feed the world today without petroleum power....you simply can't.

If that is the case, then you would agree that chasing the "green energy" panacea is a huge waste of time and material?

This is a highly simplistic view of how the world works and shows a lack of understand of markets. Just a few decades ago, "experts" were claiming that the max population of the world was 2 billion and there would be starvations, higher prices for commodities, blah, blah...just as you predict. Obviously, they were wrong.

If the market is allowed to work, and fossil fuels actually begin to run out, then they will become more expensive and other alternatives will become more affordable and replace them. This is the history of mankind, when allowed by their overseers.

And remember, the supply of oil is largely dictated by the arbitrary actions of a few in governments, not the individual people that makeup the market.

Natural gas prices have plunged as of late due to new drilling techniques, which has greatly increased supply of a purportedly finite resources. The lesson of the story:

Drill baby drill works!
_________________________
“Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.” --- Henry Rosovsky

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >