45903 Members
64 Forums
195331 Topics
3016549 Posts
Max Online: 2449 @ 05/13/13 01:57 PM
|
|
|
#2601069 - 04/16/12 02:54 PM
Re: 2013 RAM Pickup
[Re: SteveSRT8]
|
Registered: 02/25/05
Posts: 4198
Loc: MS
|
IMO the Coyote and many other Ford offerings are needlessly complicated/expensive. Counterpoint: LS7. The dry sump, titanium rod, sodium filled valve, factory CNC'd head engine? The LS7 is no low budget engine.
_________________________
2001 F150 Supercrew 1991 Mustang LX notch 1999 Mustang GT
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2601137 - 04/16/12 04:15 PM
Re: 2013 RAM Pickup
[Re: dave1251]
|
Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 10761
Loc: Sunny Florida
|
Roger that! Tis a beaut, eh? But I am speaking more to DESIGN, not individual parts.
Makes more sense now, huh? Just by adding dry sump hardware these are amazingly small and lightweight packages that fit in very small/low hoodlines, Example: Corvette.
You can always make a case for complexity, but I'm a high-miler who wants my motors to run nearly forever. Not too many modern Hi-po engines seem to fit the bill.
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith." J. William Fulbright Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph 4340 pounds, Street tires Just like we go to Publix
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2601152 - 04/16/12 04:35 PM
Re: 2013 RAM Pickup
[Re: dave1251]
|
Registered: 05/31/05
Posts: 1521
Loc: Pocatello, ID
|
Ah, I see the shutters are built into the radiator. That's better than the grill... many older trucks around here look like they were driven into a few fence posts at some point...
_________________________
1998 BMW 323iC Convertible 1975 BMW 2002 5 other cars...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2601664 - 04/17/12 09:09 AM
Re: 2013 RAM Pickup
[Re: dave1251]
|
Registered: 11/22/04
Posts: 6337
Loc: Texas
|
I really like this truck! The interior is beautiful! Engine options are very respectable too. I would probably still go for the HEMI V8 just because it wouldn't have to be as hard worked to make it's rated HP.
Good job by the RAM boys.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2601810 - 04/17/12 11:44 AM
Re: 2013 RAM Pickup
[Re: SteveSRT8]
|
Registered: 02/25/05
Posts: 4198
Loc: MS
|
Roger that! Tis a beaut, eh? But I am speaking more to DESIGN, not individual parts.
Makes more sense now, huh? Just by adding dry sump hardware these are amazingly small and lightweight packages that fit in very small/low hoodlines, Example: Corvette.
You can always make a case for complexity, but I'm a high-miler who wants my motors to run nearly forever. Not too many modern Hi-po engines seem to fit the bill. I would say the LS7 doesn't really fit that bill either, though. The complexity (speaking to 4V and DOHC, correct?) results in valve-trains that are stable (barring stock valve springs) to 8500+ rpm with fairly inexpensive stock parts and a massive mid-low lift air flow velocity advantage. The LS7 does what it does because of the expensive, race-level parts it contains.
_________________________
2001 F150 Supercrew 1991 Mustang LX notch 1999 Mustang GT
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|