Recent Topics
Whose online - Forum Stats
by 285south
1 minute 52 seconds ago
Which oil can go 5K without causing varnish?
by Merkava_4
19 minutes 14 seconds ago
switched oils and no more consumption
by ram_man
Today at 08:31 PM
High miles but new seals - HM or straight syn?
by natenkiki2004
Today at 08:30 PM
Low-friction Engine Oil
by Koz1
Today at 08:22 PM
Changing my opinion on CVTs - I kind of like them!
by Miller88
Today at 08:00 PM
Recent discovery about MAC sockets
by Merkava_4
Today at 07:29 PM
Last Night's Dinner
by Pop_Rivit
Today at 06:06 PM
Holiday Roadtrip To-Do's
by gathermewool
Today at 05:58 PM
185/65/15 to 205/65/15 on Nissan Versa
by wn1998
Today at 05:30 PM
Bought life insurance lately?
by Cadenza
Today at 05:24 PM
What Oil Are You?
by 84zmyfavorite
Today at 05:20 PM
Newest Members
consolidated, mike_a, dlayman, BRader, GuySir
52259 Registered Users
Who's Online
97 registered (285south, 390pi, 29662, 01rangerxl, 2010_FX4, 13 invisible), 1319 Guests and 218 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
52259 Members
66 Forums
223766 Topics
3548932 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#2549871 - 02/27/12 06:34 AM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: INDYMAC]
pjf Offline


Registered: 01/30/12
Posts: 66
Loc: Colorado
The plan is to save my samples (VOA & UOA) every 1,000 miles until you tell me which lab can give me a good test for transmission wear.

I suggested WearCheck because its elemental reports are more complete and includes sulfur (see links). I don't know the quality of its particle analysis. Thanks!

Top
#2550128 - 02/27/12 11:42 AM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: INDYMAC]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26519
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: INDYMAC
I really like both of these formats. Do you have to choose? Can you afford both until you decide to stick with one format over the other?

Wearcheck sets up an account for you on their web portal. Once you log in, you can access all these reports pertinent to whichever UOA service you requested (MOB2, MOB3, etc.).

You would normally start with MOB2, and only if the results turned up something abnormal, you would then request additional MOB3 test.
_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#2550185 - 02/27/12 12:31 PM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: Quattro Pete]
pjf Offline


Registered: 01/30/12
Posts: 66
Loc: Colorado
I already have an account with WearCheck. MOB-3 provides analytical ferrography (ASTM WK15810) for diagnosis of wear causality but does not provide a measurement of wear. It costs an additional $189 over the more common MOB-2 ($24) analysis.

I've collected VOA samples as a baseline. My UOA samples will be collected on the same transmission. The only variable between sampling periods may be the transmission fluid in order to compare the anti-wear performance of different fluids.

For UOA, is MOB-2 sufficient for measuring wear? If not, which ASTM test provides a more credible wear measurement?

Top
#2550367 - 02/27/12 02:54 PM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: pjf]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26519
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: pjf

For UOA, is MOB-2 sufficient for measuring wear?

I'm afraid that none of these $20 UOAs are sufficient for measuring wear. That is not what such tool was designed for. Instead, it should be used as a trending tool and a tool to help determine the condition of the oil and detect if you have any contaminants (fuel, coolant, water).

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/used-oil-analysis/

As you do your trending, if you see something that sticks out quite a bit, then it sounds like this MOB-3 would help give more info regarding wear.
_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#2552450 - 02/29/12 02:00 PM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: buster]
ammolab Offline


Registered: 01/16/06
Posts: 551
Loc: Ruidoso, NM USA
A Blackstone Oil Analysis on my BMW M Coupe was showing Lead and Copper about Ten times the average for this engine (S54). As these powerplants have very fragile Rod Bearings, I had a local shop pull the Oil Pan to find #2 Rod Bearing worn down to pure copper. They said I would have lost the engine at some point in the near future.

Spotted wear for me!

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2496835&page=1
_________________________
2009 Honda CR-V
2002 BMW M Coupe
2011 BMW R1200R
1986 BMW K75C
2005 Kaw Ninja 250
1994 Jeep Wrangler 2.5L

Top
#2552784 - 02/29/12 07:38 PM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: buster]
Cujet Offline


Registered: 02/15/03
Posts: 4362
Loc: Jupiter, Florida
I will never dispute that the common UOA can spot wear. Especially if you have a trend to watch. We use the simple tests for helicopter main transmission oil. Iron clearly shows up when wear is becoming a problem.

Here is a typical UOA from our heli main gearbox:

Iron 0.5, Copper 0, Nickel 0, Chromium 0, Silver 0 , Magn 0, Alum 0, Lead 0, Silicon 0.7, Titanium 0.2, Tin 0, Moly 0, H2O 1200.

In this case, when iron gets to about 15PPM, the gears are wearing abnormally.
_________________________
Turbo's rule.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2