Recent Topics
overthinking?
by BlueOval
04/17/14 06:00 PM
2015 KIA Sedona
by Azeem
04/17/14 05:10 PM
Rotella 15w40 in an oil burner/leaker
by Stang40
04/17/14 04:59 PM
First oil change / Pacific Hydrostar 6.5HP
by bubbatime
04/17/14 04:10 PM
Toyota WS Transmission Fluid
by 06AllAmerican
04/17/14 04:06 PM
Group III vs Group IV at 400C
by G-MAN
04/17/14 03:41 PM
Should this belt be replaced?
by Rolomoto
04/17/14 03:40 PM
Wire screen backed filter?
by Camprunner
04/17/14 03:30 PM
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS just went "live"
by uc50ic4more
04/17/14 11:55 AM
AC/DC member seriously ill
by 440Magnum
04/17/14 11:39 AM
BMW dropping Castrol
by dparm
04/17/14 10:31 AM
Shill Definition
by Pablo
04/17/14 10:11 AM
Newest Members
Northwestil01, Coor, jeff2point5, Pi1, navynuke
49602 Registered Users
Who's Online
97 registered (147_Grain, anonobomber, Analyzer, AEHaas, 01_celica_gt, 9 invisible), 1836 Guests and 212 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
49602 Members
64 Forums
212008 Topics
3322973 Posts

Max Online: 2551 @ 04/05/14 01:28 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#2549871 - 02/27/12 06:34 AM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: INDYMAC]
pjf Offline


Registered: 01/30/12
Posts: 66
Loc: Colorado
The plan is to save my samples (VOA & UOA) every 1,000 miles until you tell me which lab can give me a good test for transmission wear.

I suggested WearCheck because its elemental reports are more complete and includes sulfur (see links). I don't know the quality of its particle analysis. Thanks!

Top
#2550128 - 02/27/12 11:42 AM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: INDYMAC]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 23542
Loc: Illinoistan
Originally Posted By: INDYMAC
I really like both of these formats. Do you have to choose? Can you afford both until you decide to stick with one format over the other?

Wearcheck sets up an account for you on their web portal. Once you log in, you can access all these reports pertinent to whichever UOA service you requested (MOB2, MOB3, etc.).

You would normally start with MOB2, and only if the results turned up something abnormal, you would then request additional MOB3 test.
_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'08 C300 4Matic (M1 0W-40)
'13 F700 GS (Spectro 15W-50)

Top
#2550185 - 02/27/12 12:31 PM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: Quattro Pete]
pjf Offline


Registered: 01/30/12
Posts: 66
Loc: Colorado
I already have an account with WearCheck. MOB-3 provides analytical ferrography (ASTM WK15810) for diagnosis of wear causality but does not provide a measurement of wear. It costs an additional $189 over the more common MOB-2 ($24) analysis.

I've collected VOA samples as a baseline. My UOA samples will be collected on the same transmission. The only variable between sampling periods may be the transmission fluid in order to compare the anti-wear performance of different fluids.

For UOA, is MOB-2 sufficient for measuring wear? If not, which ASTM test provides a more credible wear measurement?

Top
#2550367 - 02/27/12 02:54 PM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: pjf]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 23542
Loc: Illinoistan
Originally Posted By: pjf

For UOA, is MOB-2 sufficient for measuring wear?

I'm afraid that none of these $20 UOAs are sufficient for measuring wear. That is not what such tool was designed for. Instead, it should be used as a trending tool and a tool to help determine the condition of the oil and detect if you have any contaminants (fuel, coolant, water).

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/used-oil-analysis/

As you do your trending, if you see something that sticks out quite a bit, then it sounds like this MOB-3 would help give more info regarding wear.
_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'08 C300 4Matic (M1 0W-40)
'13 F700 GS (Spectro 15W-50)

Top
#2552450 - 02/29/12 02:00 PM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: buster]
ammolab Offline


Registered: 01/16/06
Posts: 520
Loc: Ruidoso, NM USA
A Blackstone Oil Analysis on my BMW M Coupe was showing Lead and Copper about Ten times the average for this engine (S54). As these powerplants have very fragile Rod Bearings, I had a local shop pull the Oil Pan to find #2 Rod Bearing worn down to pure copper. They said I would have lost the engine at some point in the near future.

Spotted wear for me!

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2496835&page=1
_________________________
2009 Honda CR-V
2002 BMW M Coupe
2011 BMW R1200R
1986 BMW K75C
2005 Kaw Ninja 250
1994 Jeep Wrangler 2.5L

Top
#2552784 - 02/29/12 07:38 PM Re: UOA's and Engine Wear (again) [Re: buster]
Cujet Offline


Registered: 02/15/03
Posts: 3823
Loc: Jupiter, Florida
I will never dispute that the common UOA can spot wear. Especially if you have a trend to watch. We use the simple tests for helicopter main transmission oil. Iron clearly shows up when wear is becoming a problem.

Here is a typical UOA from our heli main gearbox:

Iron 0.5, Copper 0, Nickel 0, Chromium 0, Silver 0 , Magn 0, Alum 0, Lead 0, Silicon 0.7, Titanium 0.2, Tin 0, Moly 0, H2O 1200.

In this case, when iron gets to about 15PPM, the gears are wearing abnormally.
_________________________
Turbo's rule.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2