quote:
Originally posted by Mickey_M:
quote:
ekpolk:
Well Mickey, it's easy to tell someone their answer is wrong without saying why -- what's your explanation??? ....
For what?
All the numbers are well within normal ranges.
In fact, per mile they're within some labs' sample variances.
It's not the absolute numbers themselves, its both the change in the numbers, the direction of the change and the timing of the change. Once again, I did not say, "good heavens, the end is near for this engine. . ." The point I'm trying to make is that with what we know right now, these indications could mean several different things, anwhere from nothing all the way to the beginning of a dangerous trend.
Please take a careful look at my initial post in this thread. I said, "he's showing what
could be the beginnings of accelerated wear" (emphasis in original). On the other hand, it could well be nothing at all. Perhaps I should have said that too for absolute clarity. I would have thought that use of the term "could" would have covered it. If it were my car (obviously, it's not), I'd just watch it a little extra carefully for a couple more OCI/UOA before I concluded that all is well using 20 wt in this engine.
EDIT: for full clarity, in the last sentence, I am referring to the particular engine in the particular car we're talking about, NOT the class of engine broadly.