Recent Topics
Rotella T6 vs Mobil 1 0w40
by rw19
09/20/14 12:28 AM
All-Steel, Non-1911, Single-Action 9mm
by john_pifer
09/20/14 12:21 AM
Why Clear+Bright Oil Samples are Not Good Enough
by Apollo14
09/20/14 12:15 AM
ExxonMobil ceases drilling operations in Russia
by OVERKILL
09/19/14 11:53 PM
White House intruder makes it into building
by dave1251
09/19/14 11:26 PM
Meguiar's Car Wash Shampoo @ COSTCO $5
by Deere John
09/19/14 11:14 PM
Idemitsu 0w20 - Unique high density, good or bad?
by HKPolice
09/19/14 10:59 PM
Baltimore's finest
by stockrex
09/19/14 10:31 PM
SL-rated Subaru
by Concours14
09/19/14 09:54 PM
Oil and Filter Question?
by mavric240
09/19/14 09:53 PM
Nvidia sinks moon landing hoax using virtual light
by buster
09/19/14 09:31 PM
2006 Kia Sorento
by Stang40
09/19/14 09:08 PM
Newest Members
Talkinghorse1, kerrangsta, mavric240, LABanker, gpguy
51350 Registered Users
Who's Online
14 registered (carmine_ricca, Apollo14, Duke, cb_13, DoubleWasp, 147_Grain, 1 invisible), 531 Guests and 206 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51350 Members
64 Forums
219508 Topics
3464543 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#1791357 - 02/22/10 06:09 PM 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard
RonH Offline


Registered: 12/15/08
Posts: 159
Loc: Lakewood, CO
These are both SM CJ-4. First column the standard 10W30 Rotella, second column the new much awaited synthetic blend T5. Blackstone comments that both are good oil and should work well with very little difference.
Aluminum....0...0
Chromium....0...0
Iron........0...0
Copper......0...0
Lead........0...0
Tin.........0...0
Moly........0...3
Nickel......0...0
Manganese...0...0
Silver......0...0
Titanium....0...0
Potassium...7...3
Boron.......37...23
Silicon.....3...5
Sodium......3...1
Calcium.....2132..2234
Magnesium...7...8
Phosphorus..976..975
Zinc........1189..1197
Barium......0....0
Flashpoint F435.. 415
Fuel........0....0
Antifreeze..0....0
Water.......0....0
Insoluables.TR...0
SUS Visc@210f..64.6..64.8
cST Visc@100c..11.5..11.55
TBN............10.0..9.6

Top
#1791376 - 02/22/10 06:17 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: RonH]
jstutz Offline


Registered: 10/06/08
Posts: 1487
Loc: NC
looks almost like the same thing, all numbers look like they are within measurement error.

Top
#1791483 - 02/22/10 07:22 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: jstutz]
daman Offline


Registered: 09/23/06
Posts: 10480
Loc: Bad Axe, MI
yup looks no different. shrug
_________________________
"Always"....Mobil 1

Current fill: AFE 0w30

Top
#1791566 - 02/22/10 08:20 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: daman]
Johnny Offline


Registered: 05/27/02
Posts: 14013
Loc: Retired | Wausau, WI
Main difference in the base stocks. The old was all Group II, the new is a Group II/PAO blend.

Top
#1791606 - 02/22/10 08:52 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: Johnny]
RonH Offline


Registered: 12/15/08
Posts: 159
Loc: Lakewood, CO
So what would be better about the new oil? The basestock possibly keep the TBN high longer for longer drain intervals?

Top
#1792328 - 02/23/10 11:44 AM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: RonH]
Hoosier_Daddy Offline


Registered: 07/26/09
Posts: 244
Loc: Ohio
lower flashpoint?

Top
#1792377 - 02/23/10 12:36 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: Hoosier_Daddy]
addyguy Offline


Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 13427
Loc: Canada
Why would the FP be lower with a high-quality base oil blend?
_________________________
2003 Mazda Tribute LX V-6, 171k miles.
Oil: QS Defy 5W-20; Fram Ultra XG2 filter.

Top
#1838296 - 03/30/10 04:25 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: addyguy]
JHZR2 Offline



Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 33623
Loc: New Jersey
Because "higher quality" is an irrelevant and arbitrary term. Pao doesn't mean magic juice that is better in every way, as some make it out to be.

Top
#1844330 - 04/04/10 03:33 AM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: RonH]
whitesands Offline


Registered: 05/01/07
Posts: 345
Loc: Texas
Originally Posted By: RonH
So what would be better about the new oil? The basestock possibly keep the TBN high longer for longer drain intervals?


Although they appear identical, there are differences in the base oil which a VOA may not make obvious but might be apparant in other tests not shown on a VOA....Perhaps some difference in shear resistance and pour point...

Top
#1875787 - 04/29/10 09:01 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: whitesands]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 29148
Loc: NJ
I wonder what they are using as a FM?
_________________________
2014 Mazda 3 S GT AT - OE oil
2003 Forester XS 5spd - M1 0w40

Top
#1972352 - 08/01/10 07:09 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: buster]
hisilver Offline


Registered: 03/08/10
Posts: 530
Loc: NC
for future searchers....
I read where johnny corrected himself on another thread.
He said he misspoke and T5 is group II/III, no PAO.

Top
#1972605 - 08/01/10 10:57 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: Johnny]
Steve S Offline


Registered: 01/20/03
Posts: 18449
Loc: East of IGO
Originally Posted By: Johnny
Main difference in the base stocks. The old was all Group II, the new is a Group II/PAO blend.
Seemed like an interesting oil but for the price I am not sure that the oil is worth the extra $$$ over chevron Delo 400??
_________________________
Why do people post I want the best for my car,,, When there isn't anything that is the best on the car to begin with.

Top
#2907629 - 02/15/13 05:54 PM Re: 10w30 compare new Rotella T5 and standard [Re: RonH]
steveh Offline


Registered: 05/25/05
Posts: 703
Loc: wisconsin
Found a VOA.

Top