Originally Posted By: tig1
Originally Posted By: gmchevroletruck
I keep hearing people say things about the new formulations of Mobil 1, and it sounds like "low calcium", "low magnesium", "less than ideal ratio of anti-wear / detergents", but there is a common theme it evokes in my mind, and it starts with "S" and ends in "K". I wish I really knew more about oil in general, enough to know if it's time to abandon it altogether. For now, I keep using it. There just seems to be so much negative commentary on it, versus most other oils, on the site, and these are coming from folks who are studying oils. If it's bad, let's just say it's bad.
Oops, they're a sponsor...can we do that? LOL
I wouldn't worry about M1 oils. They are the premier synt oil producer in the world and largest PAO producer as far as I know. They have too much at stake to produce inferior oils and oil formulations are too complicated for most of to understand.
AFAIK, ESP 504/507 isn't a Group IV basestock oil anyway. the 504/507 oils I have seen group predominantly Group III
also, if you want to compare against another 504/507, I did post a blackstone VOA on the Total 504/507 a while back