Recent Topics
QS Defy 10w40 5q/$15.97
by armos
15 minutes 30 seconds ago
Mopar atf+3 type 7176
by charmer37
43 minutes 55 seconds ago
Rotella T5
by beanoil
50 minutes 0 seconds ago
power steering fluid
by charmer37
50 minutes 38 seconds ago
Can someone identify a part for Stihl KM110R
by henni
53 minutes 13 seconds ago
Oil for Audi 12V on LPG
by Guybrush
Today at 07:47 PM
Oil recommendation for 84 Caprice
by RyanCreasia
Today at 07:25 PM
Anyone Use Dorman Trans Pan on Ford 4r70w?
by AjsGarage
Today at 07:05 PM
Castrol Edge 5W50 vs Polaris PS4 & Amsoil 0W40
by revrnd
Today at 06:38 PM
Craftsman 10-pc Metric Ratcheting Wrenches $29.96
by Warstud
Today at 06:04 PM
2007 Toyota sienna suggestions
by ssneakster
Today at 05:35 PM
Fearless; the return of spring.
by simple_gifts
Today at 05:07 PM
Newest Members
macdzich, rospaw, rwwhiz, Shaggykjb, handdancer
53329 Registered Users
Who's Online
105 registered (2010_FX4, 97tbird, 01rangerxl, 5sfe91, 04SE, 12 invisible), 1729 Guests and 204 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
53329 Members
66 Forums
228732 Topics
3654761 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#1588350 - 09/03/09 08:01 PM Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke?
55Test Offline


Registered: 09/22/04
Posts: 1840
Loc: New Brunswick
I picked up an old 92 Plymouth Voyager with the Mitsu 3 liter V6 a week ago for 250 bucks. It runs quite good but it's a little smokey. I bought a bottle of Bardahl no-smoke and put it in the engine and the smoking has been reduced noticeably. I was just curious as to the viscosity of the stuff. Oh, also, does this stuff have any anti-friction/anti-wear or any other additives, or is it just a thickener?
_________________________
The total sum of everything I have learned from this website: ...Oil in engine, good!

Top
#1593262 - 09/08/09 05:02 PM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: 55Test]
ted s Offline


Registered: 03/01/04
Posts: 825
Loc: Albany NY
IT bearly pours from the bottle

Top
#1593277 - 09/08/09 05:33 PM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: ted s]
StevieC Offline


Registered: 08/21/08
Posts: 14339
Loc: Niagara Falls, ON, CA (near)
Those engines are notorious for valve seals problems and so thickening up the oil will help but nothing less than replacing the seals will fix the problem completely.

Good reliable engines that run forever as long as they have enough oil and aren't overheated.

You could run 20w50 in the engine until the cooler temps get here and then go to a 40wt then a 30wt as the temperature gets colder.

cheers

Steve grin
_________________________
'06 Hyundai Sante Fe - 330K KM's
Current Oil: RLI 0w30 (Ask me why)

Don't be part of the Sheeple, check frequently for wool over your eyes. wink

Top
#1593298 - 09/08/09 06:13 PM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: StevieC]
Falcon_LS Offline


Registered: 10/03/08
Posts: 3611
Loc: Kuwait
The real problem with the 12-valve 3 litre are the valve guides. Replacing the seals alone will only be a band aid fix, unfortunately.

Seeing the vehicle is a '92, repairing the issue will probably cost more in labour than the vehicle's worth. The best solution to the problem is to use Lexus-branded 5W-40 full synthetic. Consumption will be around a litre every 3,000 miles. If you top it up at the 3,000 mile mark, you can change the oil every 6,000 miles. Anything beyond that, and the oil will be too thin to withstand consumption.
_________________________
99 Mustang: M1 0W-40/FL820S
00 Pajero: M1 0W-40/26300-35503
01 Marquis: M1 ESP Formula 5W-30/FL820S
05 Envoy: M1 ESP Formula 5W-30/51522XP

Top
#1593312 - 09/08/09 06:33 PM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: Falcon_LS]
ionbeam22 Offline


Registered: 07/25/09
Posts: 417
Loc: Boston, MA
That stuff is incredibly thick, thicker than Lucas Oil Stabilizer, which is what I would use for this sort of thing.

IMHO your best bet is a high milage oil in the correct weight, fortified with something like Lucas Oil Stabilizer to make it more substantive.

What you are shooting for is a combination of thin oils that will creep and lubricate as well as thick oils that will stay behind and prevent blowby and dry starts.

You may also want to look up "Restore" engine treatment which contains soft metals compounds that are supposed to seal up rings and things. Seems to have gotten good reviews.

Top
#1593373 - 09/08/09 07:36 PM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: StevieC]
noi8u Offline


Registered: 09/02/09
Posts: 78
Loc: Witch City, Salem, MA, USA
Originally Posted By: StevieC
Those engines are notorious for valve seals problems and so thickening up the oil will help but nothing less than replacing the seals will fix the problem completely.

Good reliable engines that run forever as long as they have enough oil and aren't overheated.

You could run 20w50 in the engine until the cooler temps get here and then go to a 40wt then a 30wt as the temperature gets colder.

cheers

Steve grin


I wouldn't use a single 30 or 40 as the temperature gets colder! Single 40 is only good for over 60 degrees and single 30 is only good from 30-90 degrees unless you use the Amsoil ACD, which I think everyone should use.

Top
#1593383 - 09/08/09 07:40 PM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: noi8u]
Falcon_LS Offline


Registered: 10/03/08
Posts: 3611
Loc: Kuwait
I think Steve meant 10W-30 or 10W-40 as opposed to a straight 30 or 40 weight. wink
_________________________
99 Mustang: M1 0W-40/FL820S
00 Pajero: M1 0W-40/26300-35503
01 Marquis: M1 ESP Formula 5W-30/FL820S
05 Envoy: M1 ESP Formula 5W-30/51522XP

Top
#1593399 - 09/08/09 07:49 PM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: ionbeam22]
noi8u Offline


Registered: 09/02/09
Posts: 78
Loc: Witch City, Salem, MA, USA
Originally Posted By: ionbeam22
That stuff is incredibly thick, thicker than Lucas Oil Stabilizer, which is what I would use for this sort of thing.

IMHO your best bet is a high milage oil in the correct weight, fortified with something like Lucas Oil Stabilizer to make it more substantive.

What you are shooting for is a combination of thin oils that will creep and lubricate as well as thick oils that will stay behind and prevent blowby and dry starts.

You may also want to look up "Restore" engine treatment which contains soft metals compounds that are supposed to seal up rings and things. Seems to have gotten good reviews.


I totally agree. When I use to drive engines into the ground I would change the oil with a can of Restore shaken well and a bottle of Lucas Stop Leak. Then if I got down a quart I would add the Lucas Heavy Duty Stabilizer, up to 2 times since you can have 60% Lucas in the oil. I included the Lucas Stop Leak in the 60%. Since the additives are so expensive I would use Amsoil so I could go 15k miles between oil changes. No point in changing the oil every 3k miles with all those additives in it. I think Amsoil ACD is the best. In stores I like Castrol Syntec 5w50 also. No need for 0w40 unless you're gonna see 30 below zero.

Top
#1595276 - 09/10/09 12:08 PM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: noi8u]
addyguy Offline


Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 13566
Loc: Canada
I'd try Restore. Can't hurt.
_________________________
2003 Mazda Tribute LX V-6, 180k miles.
Castrol Edge SPT 0W-20; Fram EG2.

Top
#1596055 - 09/11/09 01:49 AM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: addyguy]
KLowD9x Offline


Registered: 07/26/05
Posts: 313
Loc: Lugoff, SC
It's printed on the bottle!

10,000w6,000,000

How that gets a winter rating, I don't know, but they did it!
_________________________
1993 Volvo 850 2.4i (280K miles, Valvoline Maxlife Full-syn 5w30)
2004 Volvo S60 2.4i (130K miles, Mobil1 0w40)

Top
#1596117 - 09/11/09 03:34 AM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: KLowD9x]
Colt45ws Offline


Registered: 08/15/06
Posts: 7654
Loc: Central Washington
Nothing above 50 in the standard range or above 25W in the winter range exists. Anything higher is some company extrapolating.
_________________________
-Colton
2004 Ford Crown Vic LX, 82k "Tank"
2002 Ford Crown Vic PI, 165k "Highwayman" (Ex-Kootenai County, ID Unit #42)

Top
#1596212 - 09/11/09 07:10 AM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: Colt45ws]
KLowD9x Offline


Registered: 07/26/05
Posts: 313
Loc: Lugoff, SC
Originally Posted By: Onmo'Eegusee
Nothing above 50 in the standard range or above 25W in the winter range exists. Anything higher is some company extrapolating.


Please note, I WAS BEING SARCASTIC.

Did I lay it on thick enough there? Just in case you didn't catch it this time either.
_________________________
1993 Volvo 850 2.4i (280K miles, Valvoline Maxlife Full-syn 5w30)
2004 Volvo S60 2.4i (130K miles, Mobil1 0w40)

Top
#1596257 - 09/11/09 07:46 AM Re: Anyone know the viscosity of Bardahl no-smoke? [Re: KLowD9x]
Colt45ws Offline


Registered: 08/15/06
Posts: 7654
Loc: Central Washington
I was adding it for informational purposes. I didnt read your whole post, just that number.
_________________________
-Colton
2004 Ford Crown Vic LX, 82k "Tank"
2002 Ford Crown Vic PI, 165k "Highwayman" (Ex-Kootenai County, ID Unit #42)

Top