Hate to say it, but I don't think this is a bad test at all!
He kept consistency by testing the exact same grade/specification for each oil (10W-30, SM/GF-4).
As expected, the two dino oils handled both the heat and burning much worse than the synthetics - first, loosing volume faster, and then buring away more thoroughly. Graphically demonstrates that syns handle heat better than conventionals.
They DO do a test like this for oils - 'Flash point', anyone?
Amsoil touts, and many agree, that they are one of, if not the, best synthetic oil out there for oxidative stability and volatility loss. Here, Amsoil lost less volume than the others, and when it did burn, it left behind the most residue, showing it was the most resistant to completely buring off.
Lets give this guy a break, and maybe inteligently discuss the merits of this test?
Anyone?