45569 Members
64 Forums
193964 Topics
2992358 Posts
Max Online: 2449 @ 05/13/13 01:57 PM
|
|
|
#1029189 - 11/16/07 06:55 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: Pablo]
|
Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 27985
Loc: NJ
|
Tired of the topic and tired of stickies.....next subject PLEASE!!! I'm tired of it too.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1029193 - 11/16/07 07:05 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: buster]
|
Registered: 11/27/06
Posts: 1784
Loc: Midwest
|
This is an informative website, but lately it seems thats all that is discuessed, is whether a certain oil is group 3 or 4 or 5 and whether or not it's a "true" synthetic or not.
Repeat- repeat- and repeat! Gets very old fast.
_________________________
1995 Ford Explorer - Royal Purple 5w30 K&N filter 1996 Crown Vic - Havoline 5W30 FL820S filter 1987 Mustang GT - Supercharged Street/Strip Rotella 10w30
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1029194 - 11/16/07 07:10 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: DragRace]
|
Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 27985
Loc: NJ
|
The only reason I posted it is so maybe people would read it and not jump to false conclusions and post more threads on this subject. Or should I have just let it die on it's own? [TonyMazz] Is there any FACTS on BITOG that says Mobil 1 is Grp III base stock....their site says "Fully Synthetic PAO whattssssup BITOG ? [G-MAN] I don't see PAO mentioned anywhere on their site. [G-MAN] In the FAQ it says high perf fluids are used "including PAO." That means something else is used, too. [TonyMazz] In their FAQ it also asks is Mobil 1 a full synthetic and their answer is YES...are they lying ? [TonyMazz] Each Mobil 1 with SuperSyn viscosity grade uses a unique combination of synthetic fluids and selected additives [TonyMazz] false advertising ? [TonyMazz] I am just confused... [wwillson] depends on how you interpret "full synthetic" [Dr_No] exactly
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1029206 - 11/16/07 07:37 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: buster]
|
Registered: 07/08/06
Posts: 1022
Loc: Illinois
|
I turned off the shout box. The noise went away. 
_________________________
'99 Tacoma 5VZFE '03 Civic Si K20A3 JD LT160 Kohler CV460 Honda HRR216VXA GCV160 8-27 Snowblower Tecumseh HMSK80
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1029207 - 11/16/07 07:37 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: buster]
|
Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 27994
Loc: New Jersey
|
If performance in YOUR application, determined by UOA is good, then what is the issue? One is paying for PERFORMANCE, not BASESTOCK, per se. I know some are overcome by the so-called value proposition of using PAO or better basestocks exclusively, but even those setups have their limitations.
We are at a point when the overall chemistry is more important than basestock, IMO.
JMH
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1029210 - 11/16/07 07:40 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: buster]
|
Registered: 09/09/07
Posts: 144
Loc: MN
|
I normally don't click on this type of thread but I will respond this time. Most new people to oil feel (or think) they want a 100% PAO based oil without realizing that what makes a PAO a good base oil also makes it poor at holding an additive package (very low solubility). PAO are fully saturated (no double bonds or aromatics) which helps it resist chemical attacks but also resists the add-pack at the same time. Group V and/or III are used with PAO's to hold the additives. Esters are very soluable and work very well with PAO's. It doesn't matter if it's a mixture of III, IV, or V's, it's all classified as a synthetic.
Like everything in life, to much of one thing is never good.
my $0.2
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1029215 - 11/16/07 07:46 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: bob_ninja]
|
Registered: 12/30/05
Posts: 571
Loc: Ottawa, ON, Canada
|
No, wait .. wait a second, it is actually group 25.2352353
How many decimal places of precision do you need?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1029218 - 11/16/07 07:49 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: bob_ninja]
|
Registered: 12/30/05
Posts: 571
Loc: Ottawa, ON, Canada
|
Actually Deep Throat told me it is a new super secretive group -3. Apparantly they have a new POW+ formulation that doesn't even use oil. They insert a layer of vacuum between all surfaces held in place by superconductive layer of POW+ oil. No friction, no heat, even absorbs all the engine noise. You can drive in a stealth quiet mode like that sissy Prius toy.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1029224 - 11/16/07 08:00 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: remmious]
|
Registered: 11/23/04
Posts: 203
Loc: River Falls, WI
|
I normally don't click on this type of thread but I will respond this time. Most new people to oil feel (or think) they want a 100% PAO based oil without realizing that what makes a PAO a good base oil also makes it poor at holding an additive package (very low solubility). PAO are fully saturated (no double bonds or aromatics) which helps it resist chemical attacks but also resists the add-pack at the same time. Group V and/or III are used with PAO's to hold the additives. Esters are very soluable and work very well with PAO's. It doesn't matter if it's a mixture of III, IV, or V's, it's all classified as a synthetic.
Like everything in life, to much of one thing is never good.
my $0.2 Thank you very much for this explanation and the time it took to write it.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1029237 - 11/16/07 08:23 AM
Re: Mobil 1 - BASE OILS
[Re: JHZR2]
|
Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 27985
Loc: NJ
|
If performance in YOUR application, determined by UOA is good, then what is the issue? One is paying for PERFORMANCE, not BASESTOCK, per se. I know some are overcome by the so-called value proposition of using PAO or better basestocks exclusively, but even those setups have their limitations.
We are at a point when the overall chemistry is more important than basestock, IMO.
JMH Agree 100%. Thats all you need to know.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|