Recent Topics
Is Our Universe a Fake?
by buster
07/31/15 11:38 PM
Water seperator?
by buck91
07/31/15 10:18 PM
steering wheel won't return to center on it's own
by motor_oil_madman
07/31/15 09:47 PM
Any updates on Jared Fogle? (Subway guy)
by Vern_in_IL
07/31/15 09:28 PM
Castrol MV Import users
by Jake777
07/31/15 09:28 PM
UOA Motul 300V 10W40, 2012 Suzuki V-Strom 650
by CentAmDL650
07/31/15 09:24 PM
strut mount bearing popping after repairs
by ram_man
07/31/15 09:13 PM
You cant see the engine under the oil cap on a 122
by slacktide_bitog
07/31/15 09:06 PM
30 years old with shingles outbreak
by 04SE
07/31/15 08:55 PM
0w-20 makes me wonder about 5w-40
by Jasper8146
07/31/15 07:57 PM
Unusual Belt Noise - Toyota Camry 3.5L V6
by The Critic
07/31/15 07:56 PM
Rowdy "Hot Rod" Piper passed away
by car51
07/31/15 07:33 PM
Newest Members
RobertJM, RCRcer, calthomp, pefer, ATrain
54900 Registered Users
Who's Online
16 registered (jhellwig, DeepFriar, eljefino, bbhero, Char Baby, 3 invisible), 477 Guests and 102 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54900 Members
66 Forums
235199 Topics
3784092 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#3401022 - 06/18/14 09:51 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: Falcon_LS]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 7531
Loc: Florida
Originally Posted By: Falcon_LS
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT
All I can say is, I'm glad they're taking it seriously now. I'll give GM credit for that.


I'm glad someone else looks at it the same way. Instead of hiding it under the bed sheets, they're taking responsibility for their actions in the past and doing something about it.

If they really cared that much, they would have gone back, and recalled most of their V6 engines that have weak intake manifold gaskets.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3401043 - 06/18/14 10:06 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
FetchFar Offline


Registered: 10/17/13
Posts: 831
Loc: Colorado
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.
_________________________
'07 BMW 530xi N52 engine, E60 chassis, 255 hp
'11 Chevy Camaro LS, 3.6L V6, Zeta chassis, 312 hp
'40 Chevrolet Special Deluxe 2-Door Town Sedan

Top
#3401187 - 06/19/14 05:14 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: FetchFar]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 16592
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: FetchFar
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.


Interesting dichotomy, eh? And with 9 of the 13 reported incidents suggesting driver impairment in decade old car, too.

Absolute baloney as far as I'm concerned...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3401226 - 06/19/14 07:12 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
supton Offline


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 6547
Loc: NH
I don't know about being "complete" baloney but it does underscore how many things have to go wrong. Bad switch, too many keys on the ring, bad driver and bad luck. Remove any one of them, and voila! no incidents.
_________________________
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 6spd manual, 95k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra double cab, 4.6L, auto, 98k, his

Top
#3401499 - 06/19/14 12:58 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
Win Offline


Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 3666
Loc: Arkansas
I'll say this for them - they're persistent to the point of driving me batty with recall notices on the ignition cylinder for the Solstice.

They've sent at least two letters to the lake house, which is the address I used for the purchase of the car.

They've figured out I have another address for the other Pontiacs, and have sent letters there.

The other day I got an e mail about it.

Now, I'm getting postcards from the dealer about the recall.

I think it's been almost two years since the car has moved from the garage, so I don't have much interest in getting it out just for this recall (GM knows this too - the OnStar subscription is still active).

Particularly when the switch works just fine.

I understand erring on the side of caution, but this seems really overblown.
_________________________
09 Torrent 3.6 V6 Fram 5/30
09 Solstice 2.4 I4 Fram 5/30
08 G8 3.6 V6 M1 0/40
04 Xj8 4.2 V8 Fram 5/30
99 S-10 2.2 I4
94 Xj12 6.0 V12

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3