Recent Topics
The Second Golden Age of Horsepower
by sciphi
13 minutes 45 seconds ago
Broken sewer
by Stelth
27 minutes 26 seconds ago
69 corvette m-22 4spd oil rec
by Cuda70383
47 minutes 52 seconds ago
Perplexing Toilet Issue
by GGorman04
Today at 08:40 AM
COSTCO gas now Top Tier
by wemay
Today at 07:37 AM
Illegal Or Just Plain Stupid (LONG)
by GrtArtiste
Today at 06:55 AM
2009 Nissan Navara D40 2.5L / Redline 5W30 6.960KM
by tgiannak
Today at 03:36 AM
LEXUS SC 300 coming up on MY first oil change
by 06VtecV6
Today at 02:27 AM
Time on oil filter before degrading??
by Ponch
Today at 01:05 AM
Penrite 5w-40 Diesel 5 semi-syn - tail pipe
by virginoil
Today at 12:35 AM
Funny type of "Good Book" verse...............
....

by daves66nova
Today at 12:23 AM
a decent white outdoor paint....
by daves66nova
Today at 12:10 AM
Newest Members
JRATT, kompot, Roooob, BrotherMichigan, CEHepp
51058 Registered Users
Who's Online
91 registered (95MarkVIII, Antigen, andyd, 1foxracing, 05LGTLtd, AHC, 4 invisible), 1997 Guests and 194 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51058 Members
64 Forums
218185 Topics
3439511 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#3257940 - 01/23/14 08:21 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
Eric Smith Offline


Registered: 02/26/05
Posts: 2580
Loc: Kansas City, KS
I tow quite a bit a FWD with no problems. Seeing that most fwd's isn't rated to tow more than 5k and that in self is a good load fine for most people. All comes down the engine/trans combo, overhang passed the rear axle etc.. no different that RWD's.

They have a long line of these things on Metcalf. Don't look half bad in person.
_________________________
05 Chevy 3500 (Class C RV) 31k (PU 5w30)
04 Escape 133k (PP 5w20)
02 Focus 116k (PP 5w20)

Top
#3258225 - 01/24/14 05:12 AM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 14500
Loc: Sunny Florida
^^^Exactly. Typical framing contractor who tows a small trailer occasionally will LOVE these vehicles, they are obviously NOT real heavy duty trucks like our 3500 RWD service vans...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3258423 - 01/24/14 09:39 AM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 4949
Loc: CT
My framers like LWB 3500's because they can fill them with [censored] and they are cheap to buy and run.

Just like the Sprinter if the price point is to high they won't get much market penetration.

Nissan is selling their vans like hot cakes to utility companies because they are under bidding GM and Ford.

Top
#3259055 - 01/24/14 08:49 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
01rangerxl Offline


Registered: 04/08/06
Posts: 7155
Loc: Birmingham, AL
More Euro Trash vans, just what we need. This one has been coming for a while though, and I think Ram Vans died in 2002 IIRC.

Soldier on Express/Savannah and full size NVs, you are the last of your kind!

It's a shame Ford is jumping on the tiny engine tin van bandwagon with the Transit. The E-Series is a seriously heavy duty vehicle built like nothing else in the "light duty" segment anymore. The big [censored] I-beams in the front suspension could eat a Euro van for lunch. It's a politically incorrect vehicle though...big, with a big engine, and lots of heavy metal throughout. It isn't a green tin van throwaway. I think these days a lot of businesses will "go green" rather than buy a van that will last 15-30 years, though I don't see how junking disposable tin vans will be green.

Interesting that when Nissan decided to get into commercial vans, they went with the tried and true enclosed pickup truck concept rather than a throwaway piece of foil.
_________________________
2002 Ford Ranger XLT
3.0 V6 / 5-Speed Automatic / 2WD
154K miles

Top
#3263112 - 01/28/14 08:10 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: DuckRyder]
Spazdog Offline


Registered: 09/06/10
Posts: 5492
Loc: Arlington
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder


I thought it would be an Iveco Daily first shrug
_________________________
2005 Mazda 6S hatchback - Mobil Super 5000 5W20
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT - QSUD 5W30

Top
#3263126 - 01/28/14 08:20 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Spazdog]
DuckRyder Offline


Registered: 10/20/05
Posts: 1430
Loc: Atlanta
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder


I thought it would be an Iveco Daily first shrug


And Iveco is a ________ company and _________ company was created by a merger of _______ and who?

Ergo Iveco Daily = Fiat Ducato shrug
_________________________
Robert
  • 1996 Acura 3.5RL
  • 2005 Honda Civic Sedan
  • 1972 Ford F100
  • 2012 Volkswagen Jetta TDi

Top
#3263170 - 01/28/14 09:12 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: DuckRyder]
Spazdog Offline


Registered: 09/06/10
Posts: 5492
Loc: Arlington
Is the Iveco Daily a FWD now? I haven't seen one in years. I haven't seen an Iveco in years. It seems like Isuzu took over the bobtail import market and rebadged Mercedes Sprinters (Freightliners) are the high roof van of choice.

Last Iveco Daily I saw was a dual rear wheel passenger bus. shrug
_________________________
2005 Mazda 6S hatchback - Mobil Super 5000 5W20
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT - QSUD 5W30

Top
#3263216 - 01/28/14 09:44 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Spazdog]
DuckRyder Offline


Registered: 10/20/05
Posts: 1430
Loc: Atlanta
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
Is the Iveco Daily a FWD now?...


Ah, I think you are right the Daily is rear wheel drive... it does appear to use Fiat engines and Iveco is "- A CNH INDUSTRIAL COMPANY" and CNH INDUSTRIAL COMPANY was "created from the merger of Fiat Industrial and CNH Global",

Appears the Daily slots above the Ducato in payload... shrug
_________________________
Robert
  • 1996 Acura 3.5RL
  • 2005 Honda Civic Sedan
  • 1972 Ford F100
  • 2012 Volkswagen Jetta TDi

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3