Recent Topics
Do not apply chemicals or lube to ThermQuiet Pads?
by Bill_G
5 minutes 33 seconds ago
Bobcat hydraulic pump
by Donald
Today at 02:02 PM
Viscosity Modifiers Interesting article.
by Koz1
Today at 01:54 PM
Bitog Wall of ... Thank You
by pandus13
Today at 01:37 PM
High compression ratio: is higher octane better?
by wemay
Today at 01:36 PM
Car Rebuilding
by Eddie
Today at 01:04 PM
98 Civic - torque converter lockup?
by wing0
Today at 01:02 PM
16MP camera being used in 8MP mode
by Vikas
Today at 10:50 AM
Solar Battery Chargers
by Tdbo
Today at 10:24 AM
Craftsman Snowblower 247.88955
by Droopy
Today at 09:45 AM
GY Ultra Grip GW-3 or Firestone Winterforce
by Blue_Goose
Today at 09:37 AM
Oriellys MGL51372 cut open
by DSparks
Today at 08:46 AM
Newest Members
DRISSI, kinder, SamBruin7, splatt, Lars65inc
51985 Registered Users
Who's Online
89 registered (440Magnum, 95MarkVIII, 4wheeldog, 1 FMF, 123Saab, 11 invisible), 1847 Guests and 162 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51985 Members
66 Forums
222554 Topics
3522715 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#3257940 - 01/23/14 08:21 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
Eric Smith Offline


Registered: 02/26/05
Posts: 2642
Loc: Kansas City, KS
I tow quite a bit a FWD with no problems. Seeing that most fwd's isn't rated to tow more than 5k and that in self is a good load fine for most people. All comes down the engine/trans combo, overhang passed the rear axle etc.. no different that RWD's.

They have a long line of these things on Metcalf. Don't look half bad in person.
_________________________
05 Chevy 3500 (Class C RV) 33k (PU 5w30)
04 Escape 136k (PP 5w20)
02 Focus 121k (PP 0w20)

Top
#3258225 - 01/24/14 05:12 AM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
SteveSRT8 Online   content


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 15280
Loc: Sunny Florida
^^^Exactly. Typical framing contractor who tows a small trailer occasionally will LOVE these vehicles, they are obviously NOT real heavy duty trucks like our 3500 RWD service vans...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3258423 - 01/24/14 09:39 AM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 5227
Loc: CT
My framers like LWB 3500's because they can fill them with [censored] and they are cheap to buy and run.

Just like the Sprinter if the price point is to high they won't get much market penetration.

Nissan is selling their vans like hot cakes to utility companies because they are under bidding GM and Ford.

Top
#3259055 - 01/24/14 08:49 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
01rangerxl Offline


Registered: 04/08/06
Posts: 7550
Loc: Birmingham, AL
More Euro Trash vans, just what we need. This one has been coming for a while though, and I think Ram Vans died in 2002 IIRC.

Soldier on Express/Savannah and full size NVs, you are the last of your kind!

It's a shame Ford is jumping on the tiny engine tin van bandwagon with the Transit. The E-Series is a seriously heavy duty vehicle built like nothing else in the "light duty" segment anymore. The big [censored] I-beams in the front suspension could eat a Euro van for lunch. It's a politically incorrect vehicle though...big, with a big engine, and lots of heavy metal throughout. It isn't a green tin van throwaway. I think these days a lot of businesses will "go green" rather than buy a van that will last 15-30 years, though I don't see how junking disposable tin vans will be green.

Interesting that when Nissan decided to get into commercial vans, they went with the tried and true enclosed pickup truck concept rather than a throwaway piece of foil.
_________________________
2002 Ford Ranger XLT
3.0 V6 / 5-Speed Automatic / 2WD
160K miles

Top
#3263112 - 01/28/14 08:10 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: DuckRyder]
Spazdog Offline


Registered: 09/06/10
Posts: 5493
Loc: Arlington
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder


I thought it would be an Iveco Daily first shrug
_________________________
2005 Mazda 6S hatchback - Mobil Super 5000 5W20
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT - QSUD 5W30

Top
#3263126 - 01/28/14 08:20 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Spazdog]
DuckRyder Offline


Registered: 10/20/05
Posts: 1511
Loc: Atlanta
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder


I thought it would be an Iveco Daily first shrug


And Iveco is a ________ company and _________ company was created by a merger of _______ and who?

Ergo Iveco Daily = Fiat Ducato shrug
_________________________
Robert
  • 1996 Acura 3.5RL
  • 2005 Honda Civic Sedan
  • 1972 Ford F100
  • 2012 Volkswagen Jetta TDi

Top
#3263170 - 01/28/14 09:12 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: DuckRyder]
Spazdog Offline


Registered: 09/06/10
Posts: 5493
Loc: Arlington
Is the Iveco Daily a FWD now? I haven't seen one in years. I haven't seen an Iveco in years. It seems like Isuzu took over the bobtail import market and rebadged Mercedes Sprinters (Freightliners) are the high roof van of choice.

Last Iveco Daily I saw was a dual rear wheel passenger bus. shrug
_________________________
2005 Mazda 6S hatchback - Mobil Super 5000 5W20
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT - QSUD 5W30

Top
#3263216 - 01/28/14 09:44 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Spazdog]
DuckRyder Offline


Registered: 10/20/05
Posts: 1511
Loc: Atlanta
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
Is the Iveco Daily a FWD now?...


Ah, I think you are right the Daily is rear wheel drive... it does appear to use Fiat engines and Iveco is "- A CNH INDUSTRIAL COMPANY" and CNH INDUSTRIAL COMPANY was "created from the merger of Fiat Industrial and CNH Global",

Appears the Daily slots above the Ducato in payload... shrug
_________________________
Robert
  • 1996 Acura 3.5RL
  • 2005 Honda Civic Sedan
  • 1972 Ford F100
  • 2012 Volkswagen Jetta TDi

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3