Recent Topics
2008 Accord Timing Belt
by willbur
29 minutes 32 seconds ago
Dsl extreme promo year up,so what's next?
by daves66nova
38 minutes 41 seconds ago
Wix/NAPA Gold vs Fram Ultra Synthetic (same price)
by SwedishRider
39 minutes 31 seconds ago
.05 cent oil at Advance Auto
by jpstiles02
46 minutes 15 seconds ago
28 Pictures
by Sam2000
Today at 03:14 PM
Funny piece on USA Soccer World Cup "Uniforms"
by Sam2000
Today at 02:57 PM
2006 Honda Accord LX detail *with IRON-X*
by gregk24
Today at 02:48 PM
Income multiples and large purchases
by Sam2000
Today at 02:37 PM
cut a few ...which one ya want to see first???...
by DSparks
Today at 02:11 PM
Scrub Oak Leaves; rake or mulch???
by Drew99GT
Today at 02:06 PM
QSUD $2.99 Qt after Mendards $2 Rebate
by MDS
Today at 12:23 PM
All about Chlorine
by expat
Today at 12:00 PM
Newest Members
BryanM, otbevo, AF_CyberDude, JDMHero47, Laethageal
49619 Registered Users
Who's Online
89 registered (2oldtommy, 147_Grain, Benzadmiral, 2010_FX4, aualtima3.5, Azeem, 10 invisible), 1899 Guests and 232 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
49619 Members
64 Forums
212116 Topics
3324706 Posts

Max Online: 2605 @ Today at 12:41 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3262292 - 01/28/14 06:58 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 9811
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Originally Posted By: edhackett
There you go, the blip seen in UOAs explained by simple math, no extra wear required.

Did the original research do anything to take into account residual contaminants? Or, has anything been done since?

It's all fine and well to talk about requiring time and heat to activate additives, or AW layers being reduced or not replaced at a good rate, but unless we can quantify that, we have a bit of a problem.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Wix 51358
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3262930 - 01/28/14 05:49 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: Phishin]
edhackett Offline


Registered: 06/09/03
Posts: 1445
Loc: Sequim, WA
There was no need to take the residual contaminates into account. They weren't measuring wear in the engine. The cobalt 56 in the lifter used in the bench apparatus was the proxy for wear. Traditional engine wear metals as we know them in UOA were not in the equation at all. The engines were merely a source of used oil.

Ed
_________________________
Never attribute to engineers that into which politicians, lawyers, accountants, and marketeers have poked their fingers.

Top
#3263575 - 01/29/14 09:26 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 9811
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Okay, I get you know. Not having read all the papers in question here makes things a little murky.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Wix 51358
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3280177 - 02/12/14 11:51 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: demarpaint]
MrQuackers Online   content


Registered: 08/17/12
Posts: 805
Loc: Oregon
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I read here a while back that the fresh oil with the fresh add pack does some cleaning of deposits that accumulated during the prior OCI. That cleaning frees up wear metals that might have been trapped in those deposits. That could be the cause for a slight spike in wear metals early on in the OCI. That also made sense to me.


Agreed. I change on the Hank Hill schedule.
_________________________
The more you know, the less you don't know. YMMV!!!
coffee

Behold the mighty power of the Warm & Fuzzies assimilate



Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8