Recent Topics
NM....please delete
by GatorJ
20 minutes 30 seconds ago
Quick Way of Flushing PS Fluid
by Mter00s
24 minutes 22 seconds ago
When to grease
by Dallas69
Today at 11:05 AM
Autozone has Castrol GTX SynBlend Oil $1/quart
by dmiko
Today at 10:59 AM
Another wheel torque question......Charge
r

by Blue_Goose
Today at 10:29 AM
02 Ford 4.6 timing chain guides
by swirlparanoid
Today at 10:29 AM
Best Family Hatch for 21k or under
by wn1998
Today at 09:17 AM
What is this thing by the mirror in my Expedition?
by MalfunctionProne
Today at 09:08 AM
New CITRIX user
by Donald
Today at 08:44 AM
Are the new Cherokees any good?
by LoneRanger
Today at 08:19 AM
Flushed/bled clutch, wow that's better
by LoneRanger
Today at 07:58 AM
Grand Marquis problem 4r70w
by swirlparanoid
Today at 06:57 AM
Newest Members
twspalm, phatford, howie2092, Riceman67, Mradley
52253 Registered Users
Who's Online
121 registered (3800Series, AandPDan, 97tbird, 147_Grain, andyd, abycat, 10 invisible), 1653 Guests and 223 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
52253 Members
66 Forums
223745 Topics
3548325 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3262292 - 01/28/14 06:58 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11782
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Originally Posted By: edhackett
There you go, the blip seen in UOAs explained by simple math, no extra wear required.

Did the original research do anything to take into account residual contaminants? Or, has anything been done since?

It's all fine and well to talk about requiring time and heat to activate additives, or AW layers being reduced or not replaced at a good rate, but unless we can quantify that, we have a bit of a problem.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3262930 - 01/28/14 05:49 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: Phishin]
edhackett Online   content


Registered: 06/09/03
Posts: 1571
Loc: Sequim, WA
There was no need to take the residual contaminates into account. They weren't measuring wear in the engine. The cobalt 56 in the lifter used in the bench apparatus was the proxy for wear. Traditional engine wear metals as we know them in UOA were not in the equation at all. The engines were merely a source of used oil.

Ed
_________________________
Never attribute to engineers that into which politicians, lawyers, accountants, and marketeers have poked their fingers.

Top
#3263575 - 01/29/14 09:26 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11782
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Okay, I get you know. Not having read all the papers in question here makes things a little murky.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3280177 - 02/12/14 11:51 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: demarpaint]
MrQuackers Offline


Registered: 08/17/12
Posts: 1146
Loc: Oregon
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I read here a while back that the fresh oil with the fresh add pack does some cleaning of deposits that accumulated during the prior OCI. That cleaning frees up wear metals that might have been trapped in those deposits. That could be the cause for a slight spike in wear metals early on in the OCI. That also made sense to me.


Agreed. I change on the Hank Hill schedule.
_________________________
The more you know, the less you don't know. YMMV!!!
coffee

Listen more, talk less


Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8