Recent Topics
2007 yukon shudder
by kenwin30
11/28/14 09:09 PM
Cartridge filters: OEM vs. Aftermarket
by dlundblad
11/28/14 08:23 PM
New Laptop: Toshiba vs. HP
by Tdbo
11/28/14 06:35 PM
Dale Armstrong RIP
by 02SE
11/28/14 06:30 PM
getting hosed by the water company
by ram_man
11/28/14 06:29 PM
2AZ-FE head bolt removal socket
by 01_celica_gt
11/28/14 05:55 PM
Sealants/Syn Waxes with good UV protection
by Robenstein
11/28/14 05:02 PM
Amusing TPMS issue
by OVERKILL
11/28/14 04:04 PM
$10 off all $50 gas cards at Publix
by LT4 Vette
11/28/14 03:56 PM
Cyber Monday good for computer prices
by oilboy123
11/28/14 03:29 PM
AAARRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGG
GGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!

by Oldmoparguy1
11/28/14 03:01 PM
Ariens Snowblower Issue
by My442
11/28/14 02:31 PM
Newest Members
lobstah24, MilanV607, suspekt, NPA747, hgb
52023 Registered Users
Who's Online
92 registered (825ltrgt, 77GrandPrix, 2004tdigls, aquariuscsm, Barkleymut, 10 invisible), 1320 Guests and 158 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
52023 Members
66 Forums
222729 Topics
3526125 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3262292 - 01/28/14 06:58 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11756
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Originally Posted By: edhackett
There you go, the blip seen in UOAs explained by simple math, no extra wear required.

Did the original research do anything to take into account residual contaminants? Or, has anything been done since?

It's all fine and well to talk about requiring time and heat to activate additives, or AW layers being reduced or not replaced at a good rate, but unless we can quantify that, we have a bit of a problem.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3262930 - 01/28/14 05:49 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: Phishin]
edhackett Online   content


Registered: 06/09/03
Posts: 1548
Loc: Sequim, WA
There was no need to take the residual contaminates into account. They weren't measuring wear in the engine. The cobalt 56 in the lifter used in the bench apparatus was the proxy for wear. Traditional engine wear metals as we know them in UOA were not in the equation at all. The engines were merely a source of used oil.

Ed
_________________________
Never attribute to engineers that into which politicians, lawyers, accountants, and marketeers have poked their fingers.

Top
#3263575 - 01/29/14 09:26 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11756
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Okay, I get you know. Not having read all the papers in question here makes things a little murky.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3280177 - 02/12/14 11:51 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: demarpaint]
MrQuackers Online   content


Registered: 08/17/12
Posts: 1098
Loc: Oregon
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I read here a while back that the fresh oil with the fresh add pack does some cleaning of deposits that accumulated during the prior OCI. That cleaning frees up wear metals that might have been trapped in those deposits. That could be the cause for a slight spike in wear metals early on in the OCI. That also made sense to me.


Agreed. I change on the Hank Hill schedule.
_________________________
The more you know, the less you don't know. YMMV!!!
coffee

Listen more, talk less


Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8