Recent Topics
[Cut Open] New Pronto PO4651
by JDW
08/23/14 02:45 PM
Brad Penn Oil on 03 Evo 8 w/ 4,418 miles OCI
by foot3ch
08/23/14 02:43 PM
QSUD 5W30, 7579 Miles, 2-1- RAV4 3.5L
by vwthingman
08/23/14 02:34 PM
Push mower died
by parkertown
08/23/14 12:40 PM
Old cars.
by OneEyeJack
08/23/14 11:57 AM
Top Tier Gas?
by cristphoto
08/23/14 10:32 AM
RP Max clean
by jk_636
08/23/14 10:32 AM
The Second Golden Age of Horsepower
by sciphi
08/23/14 10:05 AM
Broken sewer
by Stelth
08/23/14 09:51 AM
69 corvette m-22 4spd oil rec
by Cuda70383
08/23/14 09:31 AM
Perplexing Toilet Issue
by GGorman04
08/23/14 08:40 AM
COSTCO gas now Top Tier
by wemay
08/23/14 07:37 AM
Newest Members
DustyBones, Wilard, masterblaster426, staccatore, JRATT
51062 Registered Users
Who's Online
84 registered (97tbird, 2oldtommy, 2KBMW, 123Saab, 01_celica_gt, 1SSW, 5 invisible), 2119 Guests and 203 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51062 Members
64 Forums
218193 Topics
3439701 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3262292 - 01/28/14 06:58 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11116
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Originally Posted By: edhackett
There you go, the blip seen in UOAs explained by simple math, no extra wear required.

Did the original research do anything to take into account residual contaminants? Or, has anything been done since?

It's all fine and well to talk about requiring time and heat to activate additives, or AW layers being reduced or not replaced at a good rate, but unless we can quantify that, we have a bit of a problem.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3262930 - 01/28/14 05:49 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: Phishin]
edhackett Online   content


Registered: 06/09/03
Posts: 1512
Loc: Sequim, WA
There was no need to take the residual contaminates into account. They weren't measuring wear in the engine. The cobalt 56 in the lifter used in the bench apparatus was the proxy for wear. Traditional engine wear metals as we know them in UOA were not in the equation at all. The engines were merely a source of used oil.

Ed
_________________________
Never attribute to engineers that into which politicians, lawyers, accountants, and marketeers have poked their fingers.

Top
#3263575 - 01/29/14 09:26 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11116
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Okay, I get you know. Not having read all the papers in question here makes things a little murky.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3280177 - 02/12/14 11:51 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: demarpaint]
MrQuackers Offline


Registered: 08/17/12
Posts: 971
Loc: Oregon
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I read here a while back that the fresh oil with the fresh add pack does some cleaning of deposits that accumulated during the prior OCI. That cleaning frees up wear metals that might have been trapped in those deposits. That could be the cause for a slight spike in wear metals early on in the OCI. That also made sense to me.


Agreed. I change on the Hank Hill schedule.
_________________________
The more you know, the less you don't know. YMMV!!!
coffee

Listen more, talk less


Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8