Recent Topics
Cold Weather Oil Storage Recommendations
by SwedishRider
30 minutes 58 seconds ago
Advancing odometer mileage rapidly
by JHZR2
32 minutes 54 seconds ago
'01 Zetec: What would you use, just for fun
by fdcg27
40 minutes 48 seconds ago
Need some expertise!
by FSully1
42 minutes 42 seconds ago
Wow at all the information here
by krunk
Today at 04:45 PM
Any harm in using higher octane?
by gregk24
Today at 04:12 PM
Help Setting Garage Door Remote
by coopns
Today at 03:44 PM
best stop leak additive
by dee242
Today at 03:26 PM
2010 ford focus and Mobil 1 atf
by jay929
Today at 03:25 PM
Bad fuel?
by wemay
Today at 03:16 PM
Mobil1 prices go up..
by lawman1909
Today at 03:13 PM
need help with grinding noise (pictures)
by friendly_jacek
Today at 02:48 PM
Newest Members
dee242, OilNovice, krunk, FSully1, Jtyler
51973 Registered Users
Who's Online
101 registered (another Todd, AandPDan, aa1986, asand1, Analyzer, 01rangerxl, 8 invisible), 1649 Guests and 170 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51973 Members
64 Forums
222489 Topics
3521351 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3262292 - 01/28/14 06:58 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11756
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Originally Posted By: edhackett
There you go, the blip seen in UOAs explained by simple math, no extra wear required.

Did the original research do anything to take into account residual contaminants? Or, has anything been done since?

It's all fine and well to talk about requiring time and heat to activate additives, or AW layers being reduced or not replaced at a good rate, but unless we can quantify that, we have a bit of a problem.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3262930 - 01/28/14 05:49 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: Phishin]
edhackett Offline


Registered: 06/09/03
Posts: 1548
Loc: Sequim, WA
There was no need to take the residual contaminates into account. They weren't measuring wear in the engine. The cobalt 56 in the lifter used in the bench apparatus was the proxy for wear. Traditional engine wear metals as we know them in UOA were not in the equation at all. The engines were merely a source of used oil.

Ed
_________________________
Never attribute to engineers that into which politicians, lawyers, accountants, and marketeers have poked their fingers.

Top
#3263575 - 01/29/14 09:26 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 11756
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Okay, I get you know. Not having read all the papers in question here makes things a little murky.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3280177 - 02/12/14 11:51 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: demarpaint]
MrQuackers Offline


Registered: 08/17/12
Posts: 1094
Loc: Oregon
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I read here a while back that the fresh oil with the fresh add pack does some cleaning of deposits that accumulated during the prior OCI. That cleaning frees up wear metals that might have been trapped in those deposits. That could be the cause for a slight spike in wear metals early on in the OCI. That also made sense to me.


Agreed. I change on the Hank Hill schedule.
_________________________
The more you know, the less you don't know. YMMV!!!
coffee

Listen more, talk less


Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8