Recent Topics
What does E85 smell like ?
by Merkava_4
07/25/14 03:30 AM
Thoughts on General Grabber AT2
by Camprunner
07/25/14 02:46 AM
Collinite 845 over Meguiars Cleaner Wax
by bobbob
07/25/14 12:57 AM
Micro Guard MGL 3682 (4k miles)
by stang5
07/25/14 12:40 AM
Echo Trimmer Carb rebuild, er upgrade
by Team_FAST
07/24/14 11:02 PM
Dodge Hellcat acceleration times released
by 901Memphis
07/24/14 10:42 PM
Questions about Castrol TWS / Edge Professional
by bimmerdriver
07/24/14 09:38 PM
Pennzoil HM 5w20 in new car
by wemay
07/24/14 09:27 PM
Recalls & more recalls. Cars are now too complex!
by antiqueshell
07/24/14 09:23 PM
Honda MM logic vs. BITOG logic
by Pajamarama
07/24/14 09:07 PM
Alignment done on my ranger
by Blkstanger
07/24/14 08:47 PM
MMO suggestions!
by lawman1909
07/24/14 08:38 PM
Newest Members
tjon, Jonlee89, Tripletsredxj, Brophy, Mamba
50749 Registered Users
Who's Online
48 registered (caravanmike, Andy636, d00df00d, Barbell7, chrisri, 57ChevyLS, 5 invisible), 906 Guests and 239 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
50749 Members
64 Forums
216754 Topics
3411689 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3262292 - 01/28/14 06:58 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 10976
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Originally Posted By: edhackett
There you go, the blip seen in UOAs explained by simple math, no extra wear required.

Did the original research do anything to take into account residual contaminants? Or, has anything been done since?

It's all fine and well to talk about requiring time and heat to activate additives, or AW layers being reduced or not replaced at a good rate, but unless we can quantify that, we have a bit of a problem.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3262930 - 01/28/14 05:49 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: Phishin]
edhackett Offline


Registered: 06/09/03
Posts: 1496
Loc: Sequim, WA
There was no need to take the residual contaminates into account. They weren't measuring wear in the engine. The cobalt 56 in the lifter used in the bench apparatus was the proxy for wear. Traditional engine wear metals as we know them in UOA were not in the equation at all. The engines were merely a source of used oil.

Ed
_________________________
Never attribute to engineers that into which politicians, lawyers, accountants, and marketeers have poked their fingers.

Top
#3263575 - 01/29/14 09:26 AM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: edhackett]
Garak Offline


Registered: 12/05/09
Posts: 10976
Loc: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Okay, I get you know. Not having read all the papers in question here makes things a little murky.
_________________________
Plain, simple Garak.

2008 Infiniti G37 coupe - Mobil Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40, Hastings LF113
1984 F-150 4.9L six - Quaker State GB 10w-30, Wix 51515

Top
#3280177 - 02/12/14 11:51 PM Re: Fresh Oil = Stripped AW ??? [Re: demarpaint]
MrQuackers Offline


Registered: 08/17/12
Posts: 889
Loc: Oregon
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I read here a while back that the fresh oil with the fresh add pack does some cleaning of deposits that accumulated during the prior OCI. That cleaning frees up wear metals that might have been trapped in those deposits. That could be the cause for a slight spike in wear metals early on in the OCI. That also made sense to me.


Agreed. I change on the Hank Hill schedule.
_________________________
The more you know, the less you don't know. YMMV!!!
coffee

Let freedom ring GGOK


Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8