Recent Topics
Difference between silicone caulking ?
by Merkava_4
05/29/16 06:15 PM
The Top Dexos2 Oil Available in the USA is What?
by Best F100
05/29/16 05:24 PM
Virgin Puro L14006 [Cut open]
by Run
05/29/16 05:13 PM
The 17 year cicada is here. (locust) PIC HEAVY.
by Rand
05/29/16 04:23 PM
How long is sealed coolant good for?
by addyguy
05/29/16 04:08 PM
4T65E 2006 Buick Lucerne Normal decel gear banging
by deanm11
05/29/16 03:41 PM
California drought and 3" fish delta smelt
by HTSS_TR
05/29/16 03:18 PM
High SAPS & DPF Re-Gen
by userfriendly
05/29/16 02:50 PM
Decent little string trimmer
by Papa Bear
05/29/16 02:24 PM
Pirelli
by borgward
05/29/16 02:10 PM
'88 Cadillac smog (Emission test) fails
by momo
05/29/16 01:59 PM
Towing what to look for?
by Camprunner
05/29/16 01:48 PM
Newest Members
Moutainman31282, AlaninPA, z0bug33, smitty31, jimshep
58013 Registered Users
Who's Online
95 registered (04SE, bdcardinal, B320i, Bandito440, ag_ghost, Berny, 10 invisible), 1480 Guests and 325 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58013 Members
66 Forums
249572 Topics
4085809 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 29 of 29 < 1 2 ... 27 28 29
Topic Options
#3441144 - 07/30/14 09:58 PM Re: Is Z-Max worth a [censored]? [Re: rdalek]
Clevy Offline


Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 9782
Loc: Saskatoon canada
Originally Posted By: rdalek
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Claims are not proof that something works. To repeat said claims over and over will never change that.




And posting your opinion is not changing the facts either. The court and the FTC said the claims were proven. Unless you can prove otherwise, the court and the FTC still rules the day. I am going to keep saying that until YOU can prove otherwise. I may have to say it 100 times but if that is what it takes, so be it. The burden of proof is on you.






You make me laugh.
Z-max and it's allowed printed claims all state that the benefits it provides are due to reducing engine deposits.
So do tell. If the engine is clean and there aren't any deposits to clean up exactly how does it lessen wear or improve fuel economy.
Because of that little line "by virtue of reducing engine deposits" the exact same claims can be made by any additive manufacturer such as mmo,kreen,seafoam and any additive that reduces deposits.
So if an engine is clean exactly how does zmax improve anything,since their claims depend on engine cleaning.
_________________________
2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter

Top
#3441152 - 07/30/14 10:10 PM Re: Is Z-Max worth a [censored]? [Re: dave1251]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3730
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: dave1251
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Produce the actual tests that prove the claims.


This would be interesting because allowed by the FTC is not equal to true.


But, but, a gov't agency says they can make the claims so they must be true... crzy
_________________________

Lack of harm is not proof of benefit.

There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates





Top
#3441247 - 07/31/14 12:32 AM Re: Is Z-Max worth a [censored]? [Re: Trajan]
rdalek Offline


Registered: 09/08/12
Posts: 126
Loc: Mississippi
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Produce the actual tests that prove the claims.


You produce the test results. I have no issue with accepting the findings of the FTC and the court. Why do you?

Originally Posted By: dave1251
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Produce the actual tests that prove the claims.


This would be interesting because allowed by the FTC is not equal to true.


The claims was proven. It is right there in the court documents. Ignoring it does not make it false.

Originally Posted By: Clevy
Originally Posted By: rdalek
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Claims are not proof that something works. To repeat said claims over and over will never change that.




And posting your opinion is not changing the facts either. The court and the FTC said the claims were proven. Unless you can prove otherwise, the court and the FTC still rules the day. I am going to keep saying that until YOU can prove otherwise. I may have to say it 100 times but if that is what it takes, so be it. The burden of proof is on you.






You make me laugh.
Z-max and it's allowed printed claims all state that the benefits it provides are due to reducing engine deposits.
So do tell. If the engine is clean and there aren't any deposits to clean up exactly how does it lessen wear or improve fuel economy.
Because of that little line "by virtue of reducing engine deposits" the exact same claims can be made by any additive manufacturer such as mmo,kreen,seafoam and any additive that reduces deposits.
So if an engine is clean exactly how does zmax improve anything,since their claims depend on engine cleaning.


Why don't you call ZMax and ask them? Better yet, why not test it and see if you can provide proof that disputes what ZMax claims?

As I have said before, until you can prove that the court documents are wrong, that settlement agreement and the facts proven there still stands.

Top
#3441272 - 07/31/14 02:13 AM Re: Is Z-Max worth a [censored]? [Re: Trajan]
rdalek Offline


Registered: 09/08/12
Posts: 126
Loc: Mississippi
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: dave1251
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Produce the actual tests that prove the claims.


This would be interesting because allowed by the FTC is not equal to true.


But, but, a gov't agency says they can make the claims so they must be true... crzy



Actually, as I have said many times, the claims were proven as shown in the court documents. In the court document, it states what Zmax is going to claim then below that says this: Substantiation. The definition of that word: to establish by proof or competent evidence

You can see that in this image:



Once again, like it or not, it was proven and the FTC accepted it and so did the court. None of you have been able to post a single thing that changes that. I don't think you ever will either. I also don't think you will ever go to the FTC website and file a complaint. You know you have nothing but a opinion with no facts to back it up to give the FTC. The FTC would tell you the same thing I am, it's already been to court and proven to do what is claimed.

Until you can prove the court and FTC wrong, you are posting nothing but your opinion.

Top
Page 29 of 29 < 1 2 ... 27 28 29