Well, I picked the Blizzak's 2-3 years ago (the WS-50) because my dad put them on my mom's car over 5 years ago. Due to the fairly low mileage, her fairly "light" right foot, and the '91 Accord she drives the tires actually look great. They've been dry-stored and well taken care of and quite frankly they look and drive very well still, and are still soft. I don't expect the WS-50 Blizzak's on my '03 Accord V6 to last more than 4 seasons, I put on considerably more miles per year and drive harder while I'm at it.quote:
Originally posted by Bror Jace:
,,,
Actually, I had heard this before about Blizzaks. Their highly touted ‘multi-cellular’ compound is soft and wears out quite quickly. First year, traction in snow is superb. Second year, not too bad but subsequent years are iffy at best as most of the advantages have literally been scrubbed off.
But I thought that was true only years ago. Anyone used them for the past 3+ years? Have they fixed this serious durability problem?
[/QB]
Sooooo...
At the end of the year I'll let you know how the Nokians do but I bet I have less than 3000 miles on them before the RA-07's go back on. Actually, maybe it's me but the RA-07's actually seem pretty good for an all season.