Just wanted to add, it's true that some vehicle manufacturers have downsized the OEM size over time. That's their call.
However to the topic, even though I don't frequent them I don't want a quick lube (or indy) taking it on themselves to downsize the spec filter size on my vehicles. And though it likely makes no significant difference, imo that shouldn't be their call. One example that sticks out the most as posted here is one quick lube/jobber filter that was TWO application sizes smaller, ie., went from spec 3593a/9688/14459 application to the 6607/14612 shorty. That is a fairly big difference imo.
As an aside, for me when it comes to the thimble size 6607/14612 and SAE thread 4967/14476, I would always use the longer 7317/14610/57356 and 4386/14477 where practicable. One member has reported that Toyota has back spec'd the longer 4386/14477 where the shorty 4386 was spec'd. My .02